[panda12]

@terry wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@terry wrote:

You wouldn’t get tired of looking at this lovely lady;

Is that Cheryl Cole?

No.

Oh. Is she from The X Factor or The Voice or some equally crap Reality TV Show that desperate men fawn over?

[panda12]

@terry wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@terry wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

Proof Terry reads the Daily Mail!

And what is that supposed to mean..?

Well, Terry dear boy, you have admitted you read the Daily Mail.

And as Martin has decided to re-direct your link to the source of the original pic, then I guess that means you’ve been rumbled.

And your point is what exactly..? :-k

My point? That you read the Daily Mail. Sorry, I thought it was obvious.

[panda12]

@terry wrote:

You wouldn’t get tired of looking at this lovely lady;

Is that Cheryl Cole?

[panda12]

@terry wrote:

@anc wrote:

Soz Tedwood, but Panda makes me :lol:

Tedwood? :roll: :roll:

I was reading about the time Elvis met The Beatles and how nobody took a photograph of it. What a real faux pas that was!

No one took a picture because the meeting was inside Graceland and no media were allowed.

[panda12]

@terry wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

Proof Terry reads the Daily Mail!

And what is that supposed to mean..?

Well, Terry dear boy, you have admitted you read the Daily Mail.

And as Martin has decided to re-direct your link to the source of the original pic, then I guess that means you’ve been rumbled.

[panda12]

@chathostuk wrote:

I think this is a great debate, but we’re getting distracted by the argument over the inclusion of a press photograph.

Therefore, I’ve edited the opening post with a link to the article on the Daily Mail website rather than having the photo in question embedded in the opening post.

PS – I want to thank everyone for remaining civil and constructive in this thread. It’s been a great read up to now; long may that continue.

Excellent! Thanks, Martin!

@chathostuk wrote:

Therefore, I’ve edited the opening post with a link to the article on the Daily Mail website rather than having the photo in question embedded in the opening post.

Proof Terry reads the Daily Mail!

[panda12]

Terry, is not simply worth the effort anymore.

[panda12]

@jen_jen wrote:

Oooooh we can’t be having that panda :lol:

Agreed.

* Orders the Daily Mail for delivery.
:P

[panda12]

@jen_jen wrote:

@terry wrote:

@jen_jen wrote:

I like a bit of message board banter and humourr, but I’m really not into personal attacks and grudges of this kind.

They were my words although they weren’t posted today.
What is it with you and this ‘woman scorned’ stuff jen..?
You lost the discussion…just get over it because you’ll lose plenty more with your attitude .

I did not lose the discussion, I opted out of it when you lost the capacity for debate and began resorting to personal attacks. In my opinion once you have to resort to personal attacks in a debate you’ve lost any argument or credibility that you might have had.

But you’re not into personal attacks are you Terry? At least, not when they’re directed at you.

You’ve gotta stop this, Jen. I mean, I’m finding I’m agreeing with you more and more. :shock:

[panda12]

We are not the only generation to be concerned about this nation and we won’t be the last.
My concerns however, lie with the future of planet earth and the threats, created by man, to this planet and every form of plant and animal life.

If we don’t resolve those issues then we won’t need to worry about this country or any others.

[Author]

Posts