[panda12]

@mrs_teapot wrote:

No-one is denying that Panda, but its happened and all this ranting about what bad parents they are is not helpful in the least. Just because you feel strongly about it does not mean its helpful to endlessly go on about it.

A little girl was abducted.. its her we should focus on and the crime. The parents should be secondary to that, its unfortunate that some people seem to have got that the wrong way around.

LOL
You harped on about it first and sympathised with these criminals by admitting your own failings as a parent.

Now the McCanns want the investigation re – opened.

Our esteemed Prime Minister David Cameron:
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/863263-david-cameron-didnt-order-met-police-to-review-madeleine-mccann-case

is now jumping on the bandwagon in order to boost his own popularity and pressurising The Met to review all the evidence at a great cost to the tax payer at a time when David Cameron is ordering police services to reduce their costs.

If the McCanns want the investigation re – opened then let them pay for it from all the money they get with their fundraising, constant interviews and their salaries as a surgeon and a doctor.

And on top of it all, I don’t think this was a clear case of abduction. If it was a paedophile, why not take the other daughter too?

A child snatching ring that kidnapped kids to order so they could be sold would have plotted to take all three McCann children – they had the opportunity.

Who is to say Madeline just didn’t just wake up, panic to find her parents not there and wander off in search of them? Wander off to meet a grisly end in the sea?

Also, the McCanns, with their neglect were lucky they had two children to come back to – a fire could have easily wiped all three out.

[panda12]

@wakeupdeadisgodlike wrote:

I’ve read some shit in my time on here but this the biggest load of drivel yet. You failed at being interesting, controversial or whatever the fuck you hoped to achieve with that mess of a post.

I would be lying if i said i hoped you breathed again never mind posted again.

For once I agree with you and I only read the first line of it’s post.

[panda12]

I chose not to have kids because I wasn’t prepared to make the necessary self sacrifices in order to ensure my kids would have a proper upbringing.

I knew I was never going to be a great parent so I didn’t bother with kids.

The McCanns had a choice too and they chose to have three children.

So Teapot, it’s not ok to say:

OK they made a mistake…

They made a fecking big mistake because they are selfish and put their own interests before those of their three children.

The McCanns should be behind bars – no use saying they have been punished because of their suffering.

I fear their daughets’s suffering has been far greater than what those two clowns will ever know.

[panda12]

@mrs_teapot wrote:

I dont think for one minute they are neglectful parents, I think when you are on holiday you relax….and maybe they did things there they would not consider at home. I think if people are truthful many will have done the same thing….

Totally disagree with you.

If you choose to have kids you have a moral and legal obligation to make sure they are safe 24/7/365 and thankfully, the vast majority of parents take those responsibilities seriously.

No sane parent leaves their kids in a room whilst they dine and wine themselves 50 – 100 yards away – the McCanns were totally irresponsible and are unfit to be parents.

Sure, you can be in the same house as your kids but in a different room but not in a totally different location altogether where they are out of sight and sound.

[panda12]

@rubyred wrote:

Everybody’s worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there’s a really easy way: stop participating in it.
Noam Chomsky

Unfortunately, not “everybody” is worried about stopping terrorism, esp those that carry it out so although the theory is a good one, it is fatally flawed.

[panda12]

@gazlan wrote:

We Need A Ref

I nominate Panda, plenty of starch in her pants ;p :shock: :wink:

Aw Gaz, I’m touched but you shouldn’t go wasting your “free” time on me with all the Worldwide conspiracy theories you have to single handedly fight and right.

In between looking for a job that is, LOL. :P

[panda12]

@gazlan wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@tatler wrote:

@mrs_teapot wrote:

Ok so Bin Laden is dead…wasn’t he the reason we invaded Afghanistan? if so isn’t it now mission accomplished? and should we now be considering withdrawing our troops?

Thats the best thing i have read on this topic mrs Teapot

Osama was not an individual, he was a mindset.

Quoted from:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13259359

So no. Whether he’s dead or alive, the mission is not accomplished.

You mean like a sought of concept ? an ideology type thing ? :lol:

Feck me!

Nothing gets past you does it???

Must be all that “free” time you have to sit and ponder.

[panda12]

@tatler wrote:

@mrs_teapot wrote:

Ok so Bin Laden is dead…wasn’t he the reason we invaded Afghanistan? if so isn’t it now mission accomplished? and should we now be considering withdrawing our troops?

Thats the best thing i have read on this topic mrs Teapot

Osama was not an individual, he was a mindset.

Quoted from:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13259359

So no. Whether he’s dead or alive, the mission is not accomplished.

[panda12]

@gazlan wrote:

Hehehehehehe!

Whilst you sponge off benefits Gaz you are not “free.”

You are dependent on the system and the masters you so loathe to home, feed and clothe you and pay for your broadband.

Have the courage of your convictions Gaz! Go and be truely “free” – live on the streets and beg!

No? Didn’t think so.

:lol: :wink:

My we are bitter aren’t we . . . :o

Look at it as a kind of gentleman’s agreement :lol: they {the Govt.} infringe upon my natural rights, I then allow them to take care of any state demands made against me, for example council tax and rent while also contributing to my very minimal living expenses . . . Everyone’s a winner. I even visit there agents once a fortnight without fail, despite my extensive habitual personal agenda. Now you can’t tell me that’s not a square deal.

LOL

You are so free that every fortnight you trot on down to the Job Centre to sign on.

You have to be interviewed and have to tell (or probably lie in your case) what steps you have taken to find work in the last fortnight.

You are so free you have to fill in your housing benefit and council tax benefit forms.

You are so free you have to count every penny you spend.

Yep! That’s freedom for ya!

Go on – be truely free – and stop conforming to the nasty shackles of the Capitalist state – the streets beckon.

Here – this will help you out as a start:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeganism#Food_discarded_by_retailers

LOL

[panda12]

You know Panda, i would rather gag on my duvet than choke to death on msm shyte, Panda is the right name for you, as all you do is panda to the masters.

Hehehehehehe!

Whilst you sponge off benefits Gaz you are not “free.”

You are dependent on the system and the masters you so loathe to home, feed and clothe you and pay for your broadband.

Have the courage of your convictions Gaz! Go and be truely “free” – live on the streets and beg!

No? Didn’t think so.

[Author]

Posts