Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@gazlan wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
Seems like a genuine and easy mistake given the chaos and the number of buildings in the vicinity.
Sorry, 9/11 was not a conspiracy. Ironically the date is the same as the US emergency no.
5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error – no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today “so the guy in the studio didn’t quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy… “
. . . . SOURCE
RUBBISH! How can anyone make an error about a building collapsing 20 odd minutes before it actually collapses ? They have not explained how they came to this conclusion, error or not !You know Gaz, you need to get out more and live and work in the real World then you might understand that not everything, esp in the midst of sheer utter chaos, confusion, death and suffering as 9/11 was, is so straightforward in life.
As it is, you are such a so damn paranoid armchair warrior I bet you think even your duvet cover is out to get you.
Well I hope it is and I hope it gags you then calls in your pillow to finish you off. :roll:
@gazlan wrote:
And the good old bbc, they have never once given a believable explanation how their
‘on the ground’ reporter gave details of the collapse of the trade centre tower number seven appx 30 minutes before it actually fell. In fact it was in the background in one piece as the rubbish was being transmitted and broadcast.Snap out of it people . . . . Rid youselves of the TV and begin to live.[/b]
BBC News reported the collapse of 7 WTC twenty minutes before it actually fell.[51] The BBC has stated that many news sources were reporting the imminent collapse of 7 WTC on the day of the attacks.[52] Jane Standley, the reporter who announced the collapse prematurely, called it a “very small and very honest mistake” caused by her thinking on her feet after being confronted with a report she had no way of checking.
Seems like a genuine and easy mistake given the chaos and the number of buildings in the vicinity.
Sorry, 9/11 was not a conspiracy. Ironically the date is the same as the US emergency no.
@mrs_teapot wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@mrs_teapot wrote:
Gaz… I dare not look at these pictures, I know they will not be nice so prefer not to see… but one question, who released the picture that is supposed to be Bin Laden dead? is it an official picture released by the Americans or just one people say is him….. where does it originate from?
Google Bin Laden dead.
It seems to be the only pic.
I have my doubts about his death – the yanks haven’t paraded his body on live tv for starters.
Yes I know the pic exists Panda but where did it originate?… could be Joe Soap playing with photo-shop for all we know, and nothing to do with what actually happened. Is it an official pic released by the USA… if not its just another doctored pic released to confuse
Where did it originate?
This might help:
@mrs_teapot wrote:
Gaz… I dare not look at these pictures, I know they will not be nice so prefer not to see… but one question, who released the picture that is supposed to be Bin Laden dead? is it an official picture released by the Americans or just one people say is him….. where does it originate from?
Google Bin Laden dead.
It seems to be the only pic.
I have my doubts about his death – the yanks haven’t paraded his body on live tv for starters.
Granted the death of anyone is regretable , however in the case of iraq
it has never been the intention of america to kill innocent people, 911 and the LONDON
BOMBINGS , were a deliberate act of terrorsiam , without regard for human life innocent
or not .You sure about that, Tatler?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/jul/01/iraq.warcrimes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/world/asia/13afghan.html
Now I’m not defending Bin Laden but the Yanks and UK soldiers aren’t exactly smelling of roses either, are they?
We will never know the full extent of war crimes committed by either the US or the UK troops as it will be a bit embarrasing, won’t it?
Now 3000 died in 9/11 and another 56 died in 7/7.
We will never know how many civilians have died in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hands of the British and UK forces.
Hmmmmm.
Is he dead?
Body allegedly buried @ sea?
The yanks like to parade their “kills” on tv – rather like when they killed Saddam Hussein’s two sons.
Either the country of poor taste has become “tasteful” when it comes to their trophy kills or it’s a propaganda stunt.
Whatever, this will probably lead to an increase in suicide attacks both here and in yank land.
@toybulldog wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@toybulldog wrote:
Well, never mind.
Your entry for The Most Boring Post of 2011 has been submitted, and that’s the main thing.
It was interesting enough for you to take the time to read and comment upon though, wasn’t it?
Not really.
You’ve completely under-estimated the value of pedantic and pointless mischief making.Please try not to do it again.
You mean you have egg on your face as I’ve shown you up?
Please do try to keep up – I know it’s difficult for a lame duck like yourself. :D
@kent f OBE wrote:
My youngest had my debit card registered with Sony for his playstation …. my card has been used fraudulently since the system was hacked into.
What gets me with all these “super hackers” is…they must be so clever to manage to hack into big corporations like Sony, why don’t they put their skills to legal use and make an honest living.
Hope you ain’t lost too much dosh!
@toybulldog wrote:
Well, never mind.
Your entry for The Most Boring Post of 2011 has been submitted, and that’s the main thing.
It was interesting enough for you to take the time to read and comment upon though, wasn’t it?
@jen_jen wrote:
I had 2 facebook accounts, one for my real life friends and family, and one for people from JC (it’s the JC one that I’ve deleted).
My real life friends and family are dotted all around the country and some are overseas in different time zones; far from being shyte, it’s a great way of keeping in touch, sharing photos and so on, without it I’d either lose touch with a lot of people or be constantly on the phone.
Panda, if you really do believe that it’s shyte and for the attention seeking needy, maybe it says more about you and your friends than it does about Facebook :wink:
LOL
You’ll be the first to complain when some idiot hacks into it and uses info on there against you despite whatever privacy settings you use.
There are other ways of keeping in touch with people all over the world – ways that are more secure and private than allowing yourself to be searched and info available about you.
Says more about you really… :wink:
