Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@terry wrote:
Four more years of Obama is not as bad as four more years of George W Bush.
Four years of no Republican President is a good thing.
@terry wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@terry wrote:
Maybe you should make a connection between Labour and BNP: both are actively involved with discrimination. UKIP are more concerned with a withdrawal from the EU.
Maybe you should read my opening post on this thread.
UKIP may not be actively involved in discrimination but that’s only because they have no MPs and I believe about seven local councillors – hardly a power base from which to implement their blatant discrimination against anyone who is not a white, British male.
Thankfully, this counrty is far more demograhically diverese.
If you want to believe UKIP are a party based on racism then that’s up to you. But that would probably say more about you and your beliefs than it would about UKIP’s core values.
On the contrary, your blinded support for them in the face of the evidence for their blatant discrimination says more about you than it does me. :roll:
@terry wrote:
@momentaryloss wrote:
True Terry the link between UKIP and discrimination is not based on the party’s public platform, but on the avowed views of some of those who associate with it.
UKIP would need to get rid of anyone with BNP or similar connections to escape that.
I don’t agree with the views of UKIP but it needn’t be associated with discrimination. It does however need to take action against what might become its very own lunatic fringe.
UKIP will always get smeared with wrong-doing – it’s the nature of politics and something that played a crucial role in yesterday’s US election result too.
Not smeared but exposed for what they really are.
As for the US election, Ronmey only appealed to the white, mainly male Americans rather than the American people as whole.
His wanting to close down the car industry, taking away worker’s healthcare provisions and wanting to deny woman their rights is lunatic so yes you’re right in that respect that lunacy played a part in yesterday’s election results.
@terry wrote:
Maybe you should make a connection between Labour and BNP: both are actively involved with discrimination. UKIP are more concerned with a withdrawal from the EU.
Maybe you should read my opening post on this thread.
UKIP may not be actively involved in discrimination but that’s only because they have no MPs and I believe about seven local councillors – hardly a power base from which to implement their blatant discrimination against anyone who is not a white, British male.
Thankfully, this counrty is far more demograhically diverese.
@wordsworth60 wrote:
For me a wonderful result for all kinds of reasons and I think symbolically and pragmatically it will be the best thing for America.
To think at this point after the last Election, some people – even professed supporters, even in JC – were predicting that he wouldn’t be allowed to live out his first year as president, let alone survive politically. But America has decided that he should be their president for as long as possible.
Wonderful!
America has come along way since the 1960s.
*goes off to play Fatboy Slim’s Praise You
@sceptical guy wrote:
Wilma!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry , but this thread is dedicated to Freds :P
@lucy53leeds wrote:
now the rowing boat song was good! good for toning up the tummy muscles lol :o
Was that the one that went “oops upside your head?”
Rumour has it that UKIP and BNP supporters are confused by Obama’s election win.
They don’t understand how a black person can be allowed into a white house.
8)
:wink:
Yes! :D/ :D/ :D/
Well done Obama!
I can go to sleep now. :D
So The Big Bollocks would be a more suitable term, then?
