Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@j_in_france wrote:
@terry wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
What intrigues me more is how we can go from a simple glib statement from Terry about who Kim Kardashian is (and of course he knows she’s female, her picture is all over the place, I don’t read newspapers or watch tv and even I can’t get away from her!) to a condemnation of people for – gasp – using fake names and daring to use obviously fake photos
A good post jen. =D>
I just wish J_in_France would wind his neck in sometimes.
you can wish teresa but if I disagree with what you say I will say so
It’s a rather sad to call Terry, Teresa. It really isn’t funny.
:roll:
@terry wrote:
This is the kind of advice McCartney should stick to;
Nothing wrong with McCartney showing his political colours.
Would you be complaining if he had urged people to vote for Romney?
@terry wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
So it’s ok for the British media to cash in on her, for her to be put thrust into the media spotlight and have her appearance dissected and her every move documented?
No. It’s vulgar.
I agree with you panda: the press should leave her alone.
:roll:
Pippa Middleton is vulgar in using her royal links to cash in. It’s hardly dignified and befitting of the sister of the future Queen of England.
The press may be vulgar but there is no need for her to stoop to their level. It shows she has no class.
@jen_jen wrote:
So it’s ok for the British media to cash in on her, for her to be put thrust into the media spotlight and have her appearance dissected and her every move documented until the novelty wore off, simply for simply for being the sister of Kate and having been bridesmaid at her sister’s wedding, yet it’s not ok for her to cash in in even a small way like this?
No. It’s vulgar.
@terry wrote:
McCartney today. :roll:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1pfbe9GzPyg
Nice one, Mr McCartney! :D
@terry wrote:
@kent f OBE wrote:
I have nothing against her trying to make money…why shouldn’t she?
I agree. But I still won’t be buying the book.
If she wasn’t Kate’s sister she wouldn’t have got a publishing deal.
I wouldn’t call it earning a living more exploiting her famous, Royal links.
I doubt she has an ounce of talent. :roll:
@jen_jen wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
Haven’t we had this discussion before or am I having déjà vu? :?
What a thread about how foxes and their behaviour has been misconstrued?
Some ppl call foxes vermin. They’re not.
Yes, a thread of this nature…or am I imagining it? Just wondering whether I’ve finally lost it! :lol:
If there has been, apologises but I’ve not seen it. Foxes are a much maligned animal and it shouldn’t be so. It’s time some of the myths were broken down.
Why will foxes kill more than one chicken at a time?
For the same reason that most of us buy more than one slice of bread when we go to the supermarket – it is, quite simply, forward planning, and while it can be distressing to see, it is only an instinctive response to finding a plentiful source of food.
Unlike, say, horses, foxes’ access to their various food supplies is erratic, and their survival instincts dictate that they should make maximum use of whatever opportunities come their way. Anything that they cannot eat at once will eventually be taken away and buried for future use.
Surplus killing is rare under natural conditions because wild prey is generally good at defending itself. For example, if a predator takes a woodpigeon, the rest of the flock will fly away, something that chickens in a hutch are unable to do.
@jen_jen wrote:
Haven’t we had this discussion before or am I having déjà vu? :?
What a thread about how foxes and their behaviour has been misconstrued?
Some ppl call foxes vermin. They’re not.
It’s beyond comprehension.
@anc wrote:
hmmmm, being a farmer’s daughter, and living in London – I see both sides of the fence here!
Killing is not the answer as these ppl have found out:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4298578.stm
and here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1405940/Brave-Lancelot-the-llama-keeps-foxes-at-bay.html
