Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Everyone expresses emotion differently, we all know that. How many of us know someone who, when the pressure is on they have the ability keep a brave face on, but inside we know they are crumbling?
If she was constantly crying you can bet that people would be saying “crocodile tears”, she cant win either way.
The family of Madeleine are to launch a fresh advertising campaign to help find her.
With all the recent attention being on the parents apparant part they played in her disappearance, im glad to see the search for maddie is back on track.
@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
The answers a simple one Pebbles, watching an act and taking part in an act if different.
Viewing any martial may affected what you think, but would not necessity cause you to break the law.
Has for a lack of sympathy for the victims of abuse, most of the time, the victim knows and trusts the abuser.
Some victims go on to become abusers
So is it a case of sympathy for the victim now, hatred for the abuser later?
You need to make up your mind if a victim of abuse is still a victim after he/she abuses.
So am I right in thinking that YOU personally dont see anything wrong with people viewing child po/rn? And by the way, viewing this sort of material IS breaking the law, hence why Langham was locked up.
Your lack of sympathy for the victim stems from the fact that some of them will go on to abuse themselves at a later stage of life. This may be the case, but similarly, i expect the majority dont. I personally cant understand why they would having gone through it themselves. If you seriously dont feel any symapthy towards children who are subjected to this, then im afraid to say that says rather a lot about you Doa.
@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
We all saw videos of 9/11 attacks on tv.
Using Sharongooner argument are all going to start bombing campaigns?
Should everyone who saw the video be lock up?
And what about the victims…………?
Doa, how you can compare watching the national news coverage of the events of 9/11 (at the time you couldnt put the tv on or pick up a newspaper without it being there) to actively seeking child po/rn is beyond me.
Again, you cant draw comparisons between victims of a terrorist attack to victims of child abuse, these are two totally different scenario’s.
Why is it that you seem to have little or no symapthy for the victims of child abuse, Doa?
Aside from Langham being exposed as the paedophile that he is, only one other good thing that has come of this case. Two of the video clips found in his possession showed an 8-year-old girl being tied up and sexually abused by her father. The young girl has since been identified and rescued. Her father has been prosecuted.
What sort of person could possibly get a kick out of seeing this? he makes my skin crawl, i hope he has a very unpleasant time inside.
Going back to the point of his sentence being lenient because of the number of videos he had in his collection, the police actually found evidence that Langham had attempted and failed to download many other videos of child po rnography. So you see, its not that he didnt WANT to see any more videos it was that he had attempted and failed.
5 months is a joke.
im confused, what does eating salad have to do with being single? :roll:
speaking of miss quotes as you were Uber, I didnt say videos created paedos, i actually said, and i quote “viewing images creates a DEMAND which encourages others to continue abusing and hurting children.” Get it right.
between this post and the other deleted maddie one, i think weve all worked out that Uber is a sad pathetic man who finds it amusing to make jokes and “smart” comments about child abuse. Hes a joke.
oh do shut up you boring old man…people see you for what you are, a sad perverted (and most likely bald) old man, they dont need me to point it out for them
waits for the next mind numbing installment from uber pri ck zzzz
