Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
something just struck me Doa, how do you know this??
QUOTE FROM DOA “I know a lot of broadband companies ban them (child po/rn sites) and do not allow access to them”END QUOTE
:shock:@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
No Anita I am just being reasonable and realistic.
There been so much public hysteria about this subject, there has been a witch-hunt going on for many years now, I think its time we all asked ourselves;
What is a paedophile?
Personally I don’t think Chris langham meets my criteria for being one.
I don’t think he’s a danger to children but if he’s only curious about the subject, locking him up with hard-core paedophiles is the worst thing to do.
Doa you cant be serious? You really dont see anything wrong with what hes done??? I worry for you if thats the case. You say hes not a danger to children, i disagree, he obviously has these sick thoughts in his head otherwise he wouldnt have felt the need to look up and keep these videos. He might “only” of had 15 vidoes at the time, who knows how many more he would have collected had be not been caught, or where this sick lust for children would have led?
@ubermik wrote:
Ole MCanno’s had three bairns
Where’o did one then go?
With a look look here
and a look look there
here a look there a look
everywhere a look look
Ole Mcannos had three bairns
Deary dear oh no:lol:
Pathetic. Finding the subject of a missing (and now presumed dead) child amusing, you really are a very weird man
@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
I am not sure how you would find a child p or n site on the web, I know a lot of broadband companies ban them and do not allow access to them.
May be Pb can have a go at finding one later and report back on the results.
But I don’t think downloading 1 file of a 8-year-old girl makes someone a paedophile, only curious.
After all the talk about it, a lot of people are curious about the subject, (mostly those who where abused in the past.)
Has far has 40 year old men “smiling seductively” at 12 year old girls, you have never been to London fashion week.
doa the man had 15 such videos/pictures so i think we can safely say he was a little more than “curious.” Why anyone would feel the need to see for themselves what someone else has described as horrific child abuse, is mind boggling, and to pass it off as curiousity is a pathetic excuse. In fact anyone who seeks this kind of vile material, whether it be 1 picture or however many more, must have some paedophile tendancies to want to see it in the first place.
Doa to suggest that you could “accidentally” stumble opon child po/rn on the net is a ridiculous thing to say. Anyone viewing these images has actively searched for it, and the intent to view it is most certainly there.
As for a 40 year old man smiling seductively at a 12 year old, i find that quite disturbing
Doa, 3 words…beans on toast :lol:
Doa some of the pictures/videos were of an 8 year old girl and were described as a horiffic level of abuse
You might say that viewing the images is not as punishable as actually committing the offence but Paedophiles viewing images creates a demand which encourages others to continue abusing and hurting children.
There is no excuse for downloading and viewing images of child sex abuse
I read somewhere that he was actually abused as a child himself, its often the case that abused people go on to abuse themselves.
@magpie2005 wrote:
Who gives a monkeys fart who wins. Big Brother is nothing short of being moron TV: they stick morons inside a house so that other morons have something to watch. It is the most insidiously boring garbage that should be removed from the box. It was interesting when it first started… for about five minutes… three of which I used to go to the bog and one to answer the door to a gas salesman who was infinately more interesting than the idiots on the show.
I agree that the show has lost some of its appeal over the years but i still think theres something quite interesting about being a fly on the wall, i love it and i think davina and dermot are ace :lol:
