Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@pete wrote:
I said quite clearly we and people, not me, you got nothing constructive to say then fuck off and start your own thread there’s a good lad
Me is a subset of we, you dullard. You can’t have we without me because that is them.
I’m glad you infer you don’t, though. For a moment I had an awful vision. You were on your sofa, rolls of lard falling over the top of your y-fronts, stuffing black pudding into your fat fucking face, belching at X Factor and cursing the gods everytime a Bodyform advert came on.
@pete wrote:
I didn’t tell them anything and i’m not remotely religious. What’s up, nappy rash being a bitch again.
@pete wrote:
God forbids eating meat without first draining the blood. Many JWs have needlessly died because the governing body considers blood transfusions to be “eating blood.”
Clearly a transfusion is NOT eating and this has cost this young boy’s life
That’s you giving your own view of scripture, that is.
@pikey wrote:
What right do you have to hand down your religious dogma?
@pete wrote:
They should feel their God gave man a brain, and man discovered blood transfusions to save life, which is supposed to be sacrosanct i thought
@pikey wrote:
Who are you to tell them what they should feel?
@pete wrote:
What a very DEAD young man, what a very brainwashed young man and what a waste of a young life.
What? Could he have done more work for ze Fatherland? He was a human being who decided to keep his faith until the very end. Who are you to say he’s not up in heaven right now with a Hemingway Daiquirí being serenaded by angels for his beautiful life? Why are you always so keen to be telling everyone what they can and can’t do with their own bodies?
Philistinism is so rarely attractive.
Surely a man has the right to keep whatever god or gods he chooses. Who are you to tell them what they should feel? What right do you have to hand down your religious dogma?
Good on the lad for sticking to his principles in the face of death, I say. What a very brave young man.
Indeed. Warm weather is no excuse for dressing in an inappropriate manner. It’s what cotton is for.
@pete wrote:
Isn’t enough that we have erectile dysfunction and vaginal freshness ads on TV while people are trying to eat.
(sic)
You don’t even turn the telly off when you’re eating and still have the nerve to play the prig with a delicate disposition?
It does look like I was a tad idealistic with the all the putting our country before established interests stuff. Still, one step at a time and all that.
Freedom? Sounds more like ethic cleansing, old girl. I’m sure I must have it wrong. Who, exactly, constitute these ‘white settlers’?
It’s not that they’re being Nazis or anything. People are just people. I think someone mentioned early on, it’ll be just because there’s so many kids in the place that if they let them bring cake in for birthdays there will be cake nearly every day. That wouldn’t be a special Famous Five treat served up with lashings of ginger beer, that’d be a load of kids all nicknamed Tubby or Tubbette.
These things we see in the news like this aren’t the reason for anything. I reckon they’re symptoms. It should be giving people the clue that these nurseries are operating at the wrong scale. That’s the real issue, I’d say. To borrow a phrase from our Gaz, it’s not natural to corral that many anklebiters of that age in the same place. Nurseries, in my view, should be smaller and more numerous.
It is true. You do need to be able to identify mingers. It’s a basic human right that tops most of the others, I reckon.
