[pikey]

What’s rich and famous got to do with it? Are you of the understanding that alcoholism only effects the top earners of the country?

[pikey]

Drink do you, Pete?

[pikey]

Don’t drink it, Sunny. You’re bound to end up like George Best.

[pikey]

I am. I’m getting bored half to death by you and your clique.

[pikey]

@Baldy wrote:

Blah blah blah here’s a picture of a baby with a spliff.

@MardyPete wrote:

Here’s a picture of someone who takes drugs and they don’t look very well. Do you see? They don’t look very well!

Wonderfully argued, chaps. Don’t you think so, Pikey? I do, Pikey. What marvellous analytical insight you’ve each come up with. Fantastic examples of wit and scathing intelligence. Bravo.

[pikey]

They were alright, I heard. The Czechs are tidy. A nice draw, I reckon.

[pikey]

I only gave it three stars on YouTube.

[pikey]

Good. Serves them right.

[pikey]

Allow me to retort: What a load of guff.

Evening, Baldy and assorted luvvies. I’m not making a case for drug addiction. I’m making a case for taking drugs. A distinction that seems to be lost on you. Drugs and addiction are not coterminous. Do try and keep up. I’ll break it down for you:

Where A is drug takers (of all sorts) and B is addicts (of all sorts).

You’ll notice not all addicts are drug addicts and not all drug users are addicts. An obvious point, one would think.

Now, keep concentrating:

Drugs are dangerous.

However, many worthwhile things are also dangerous. Motor racing, for example.

Inherent danger alone, then, is not always a reason not to do things. Life would be boring. Especially if we can show what might be an occasional obvious benefit arising from said activities.

Ladies and germs,

Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s ~ Kubla Khan. I’m sure you can think of your own examples.

[pikey]

Sorry, that’s bouncy castles I’m thinking of.

[Author]

Posts