Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
12 February, 2009 at 7:55 pm #390924
pssssttt PB started it
12 February, 2009 at 7:51 pm #390922:-k :-k :!: :-# :wink:
12 February, 2009 at 7:45 pm #390920C’mon spill 8-[
12 February, 2009 at 6:43 pm #391438@forumhostpb wrote:
The woman clearly broke their laws and quite rightly she will receive 100 lashes. After all, given her condition, she can hardly deny that she committed “adultery” – acording to Saudi law. She’s lucky that they didn’t sentence her to be publicly stoned to death.:shock:
12 February, 2009 at 6:02 pm #390918@forumhostpb wrote:
@reason wrote:
Pardon me for being cynical,but it seems to me that you use third parties opinions to express your own beliefs.
Be as cynical as you like – I usually am – but i don’t see the point that you are trying to make.
If I want to express my own beliefs on a matter, believe me I am more than capable of doing so.
Oh,how is Gwendoline btw?
12 February, 2009 at 6:01 pm #391436@forumhostpb wrote:
@reason wrote:
Ay the end of the day and i don’t give shyte what anyone says,the woman done nowt wrong and the sick bastads that did it want stringin up :evil:
Sorry to have to, once again, play the Devil’s advocate. This entire matter is emotive because of the allegation (made by her) that she was raped (by four men).
If there was no rape allegation and it was simply that she had gone out after dark; got into a car driven by a man that she didn’t know (contrary to local law) ; spent the night having intercourse with him and / or his mates (again contrary to local law); chances are that very few eyebrows would be raised if the Saudi Courts punished her.
I’m sure she wasn’t the first to be punished for this “crime” and she won’t be the last either. It certainly wouldn’t have made the headlines in the “Daily Fascist” without the rape allegation being a part of the equation.
The whole rape thing came about when it transpired that she was pregnant. so what evidence is there that she was actually raped? As far as Saudi law is concerned – none whatsoever. Simply the unsupported word of a female and an allegation made some long time after the alleged offences took place.
You forgot to mention that she was found guilty of adultery although she was unmarried :shock:
12 February, 2009 at 5:50 pm #390916Pardon me for being cynical,but it seems to me that you use third parties opinions to express your own beliefs.
12 February, 2009 at 2:47 pm #143543@woohoo wrote:
@reason wrote:
@woohoo wrote:
My secret is out too.. FFS, i tried my best to keep it hidden.. T’was the Take That bit that gave it away wasn’t it? :lol:
Aye it was ……. ffs i knew i should have been more discreet and said The Village People #-o
Oh i don’t know, what’s the opening lyrics of one of their songs?..
Young Man,.. There’s no need to be shy.. :shock:
I’m so glad Gary Glitter didn’t cover that track..
FFS, watch this post get deleted, and me get my final warning.. :lol:
Nahhhhh you’ll just get a slapped ….errmmmmm ……best not :-#
12 February, 2009 at 2:42 pm #122578@woohoo wrote:
This Text this morning!
I luv ur eyes, i luv ur smile, I cherish ur ways, I adore ur style. wat can i say, ur 1 of a kind and 24/7 ur on my mind!
How Sweet! :lol: :wink:
I try me best :oops: :D
12 February, 2009 at 2:39 pm #166728 -
AuthorPosts
