Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
gales
disturbing
hales
coles
votes
noise
Seems to be a discussion going around and around in circles. If adults on this very thread have said, they have encountered difficult/dangerous/unwanted situations with Face book, then it is obvious minors will do the same. Rather than turning to the Nanny state, perhaps it is time for parents to take the reins (again) and use a decent parental lock or block for pages that are eighteen plus, or settings, that they do not want there children accessing, with out there knowledge. Yes those of you who sceam, children have rights, they do, and a parent has responsibility to keep said child (a) alive and (b) out of harms way.
So thus take control of the situation, not relying on the state, school, courts to do the parenting, for them.
surf
However the argument and comment was not about children dying from heart attack. If you wish to start a thread in that regard, or a general post on that, be my guest. My comment was in regard to FACEBOOK and the inherit dangers there in. Not in crossing the road, not in playing during recess, not in gym class. So if you wish to discuss twisting arguments, please look at your own examples. I posted in regard to FACE BOOK, after others had posted on the same subject.
the death of a thirteen year old girl, is a nanny state argument to you. Thank god, im not part of you thinking and nanny state then.
