Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@minim wrote:
@sir Actor wrote:
He thinks she will meet someone else at uni.
She thinks he will meet someone while she is away.Neither could bear the hurt so they end it on their own terms.
Wouldn’t it be great if they could get past this hurdle and stick it out?
That would be the true sense of maturity in all of this.Yep, I agree with Actor too.
It is a mature decision, they will be able to flex their single muscles so to speak, and if they still love each other at the end of the 3 years, no harm done, and they will be firmer than ever before.
We never agree on anything minim.
This is a first.
Probably the last too.note to self
Tomorrow we need a thread dedicated to cheesy music.
The cheesier the better.
I’m thinking Long Haired Lover from Liverpool.Hang on that was a fooking classic.
classic cheese.He thinks she will meet someone else at uni.
She thinks he will meet someone while she is away.Neither could bear the hurt so they end it on their own terms.
Wouldn’t it be great if they could get past this hurdle and stick it out?
That would be the true sense of maturity in all of this.Only time will tell if they’ve made the right decision.
They can always change their minds and probably will.15 Julie Andrews
British and beautiful but with a hint of prim and proper.
@pete wrote:
rock and roll put another nickel in the juke box baby
pete….admit it son.
You love pie n chips.
For breakfast.Note to self
When the news channel says the “heroes” have returned home just remember it is in fact a bunch of sportsmen coming back from China they are referring to.
It’s not the troops who are risking their lives every day in the middle east.
@toybulldog wrote:
Why exactly do people use these patronising scabs of yellow facial smallpox ? I’m not completely sure that I like them.
Because, like Everest, they’re there ? Maybe some believe that their posts cannot truly be understood without bluntly signalling the intent, but you have to admit that they are pretty lame. I really can’t see the point, except for illiterate seven year olds, and sir actor.
Am I being a tad sarcastic ? If only there was some way or hint I could use to help you tell………… I was reading some of Churchill’s great inspiring speeches, and thought, damn, if only he could have used emoticons – I’m sure the War would have been over a lot quicker. They are so very last century anyway, and isn’t plain text what all the cool people use? Not having them would of course give this place more of a Luddite feel, and might even add to its charm, if that could be possible.
I might use one if it could depict my usual state of mind. However, as yet no one has been able to depict anger, jealousy, tourettes, fake keyboard warrior-ness combined with a slight hint of inferiority complex on the one cute smiley face.
L O L
I’ve read this post already – or one very similar to it – on a blogsite I happened upon some time ago.
It’s doing the rounds at the moment.
Thanks for the mention by the way.Taking the moral high ground by criticising posters on a message board is all very well but why stop with second hand frustrations at emoticons?
You could easily have taken your objections a little further by slating those who failed to meet your very high standards with regard to grammar and spelling for instance.
But you didn’t.
Maybe (as Churchill will have pointed out in one of his awe inspiring speeches that you’re so fond of..) it would have been a Bridge Too Far to criticise the foot soldiers to that extent.
The only truths I’ve learned here is that you obviously know which side your bread is buttered.
Oh, and that you lack originality.I shall refrain from using the “rolling eyes” emoticon in your honour.
@pikey wrote:
What a wit you are. To think that only took you half an hour to think up.
It took me 20 seconds actually.
About as long as it takes you to get your burberry gear on.
You two bob chav twat. :lol:
