Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@emmalush wrote:
OR they’ll wear gloves…become “professionalised” being very carefull, which will make it harder to catch them, which means we’ll need more “protection”, like cameras on street corners…new labour KNOW this.
Oh this is jus rich….so if we make it harder for the crims, they’ll jus become smarter right and make it harder to catch them….oh my god Emma, you’ve jus given the hint to every burgularing scrote that wearing gloves means they won’t get caught!!
FFS, you don’t think they’d have thought of that without your help!!! The idea that a national database for DNA/fingerprints will make it HARDER to catch crims is jus so far off the mark that it has met itself coming back.
1. Zero tolerance for all crimes
2. DNA/fingerprint database
3. More prisons, longer sentences, no parole, no remission
4. Increase in income tax of 2p for 25,000 more police officers on the beatSimple…..really
Unfortunately BM, Emma chooses not to post anything about white people (unless it fits in with her ideology)
How many times does it have to be said
There are bad white people, bad black people, bad blondes, bad gays, bad lesbians, bad midgets, bad liberal pinky lefto communist vegan extremists
Bad is bad and has f/uck all to do with colour- however Emma chooses to use extremism in other races as symbolic of that races entire apsirations.
Jus cos some black professor (or whatever he is) chooses to say (and I haven’t read it, i’ll jus take Emma’s word for it) whatever he chooses to say- don’t make it right, but it don’t make every bloo/dy black person sympathisers and supporters of this fruit
Its a marathon…not a sprint
Even the mighty fall sometimes :)
I think it was aimed internally at the Lebanese people who suffered disproportionately during this invasion and externally aimed at Western media and governments to show Hizbollah in a thoughtful, compassionate and peaceful way.
And in some ways, it worked….Israel continues to make aggressive statements about a return to conflict and Hizbollah are now all sweetness and light. Not rocket science but clever none the less
@emmalush wrote:
@slayer wrote:
we believe that a DNA or finger print database (or both) is the safest way to prevent crime in the long term and solve crime
If you have your finger prints taken, or DNA or both, how will that stop you commiting a crime? It wont stop you banging an old lady on the head with a hammer, WILL IT?????
AND, if you want to prevent yourself from commiting more crime, why not get the government to install CCTV cameras in your home :D
GOSH your stupid…
Wrong- it will stop crimes being committed.
We regualrly see the same person convicted of multiple crimes- whether burglary, assualt, rape, murder etc
If you get caught after the first crime thanks to a DNA/finger print database, you can’t commit any more crimes
DOH, and you call me stupd!
And long term, once those who are so inclined to commit crime realise their detection and conviction becomes so much easier thanks to a DNA/Fingerprint database, they’ll stop committing crimes
DOH, and you call me stupid
We will never ever remove crime from our society but we can take the initiative away from the scrotes and sh/ytes who commit crime and a DNA/fingerprint database is one way- it is time for society to fight back
@emmalush wrote:
@drivel wrote:
What the feck has cameras got to do with fingerprinting or DNA swabs for a database – surely it would make the country a safer place
Why do YOU need to be finger printed?
Drivel doesn’t NEED to be printed, neither do I but as citizens of this country (the ones who you say never have a voice and are never listened to, the ones who you won’t listen to now cos YOU don’t like what we say), we believe that a DNA or finger print database (or both) is the safest way to prevent crime in the long term and solve crime in the short term and as such, we have nothing to fear from both of us having our DNA or finger prints on a national database.
Simple- listen to the people, the ones who never have a voice
@emmalush wrote:
@slayer wrote:
You should be very careful in asking for votes on issues such as the “make up” of a society. You may wish to demonise those who aren’t anglo saxon Emma but, trust me, it isn’t a big leap to demonise those who are gay, disabled or who don’t “fit in”.
With effective and targeted propoganda (which the BNP excel at), society will turn against any group/section in our society. The Nazi regime managed to convince an entire nation that the Jews and Slavs were subhuman scum worthy of nothing more than extermination.
It’s a slippewy slope to wack and wuin
Im gay you pillock, well bi-sexual…i quite like the idea of demonising you :) i have a dungeon with your name engraved inside :D
The new nazi labour party have managed to convince our nation that multicultural mass immigration is workable, and now there somewhat back tracking.
When an organisation of people like those within the BNP, gain our country from them, i will plead to have sole controll of your mind, for implementing nightmares in mine, thats fair.
You don’t need a dungeon, I have my very own cellar with a rack, ball n chain n whips. You won’t beat me Emma (unless you ask very very nicely :wink: )
I know you bat for both sides, dingbat
My point is demonisation does not start and end with just one section of society, once we are white and english, someone else will need to be blamed for all the ills, n guess what….gays and lesbians will be next…along with mentally and physically handicapped, those who are different or don’t conform…thats how it works Emma…that slippery slope is calling your name
And perhaps that should be soul control rather than sole control???? Freudian slip maybe….. :D
words are used everyday by people who believe their application of that word to the occasion is correct
@emmalush wrote:
EXACTLY, so we must realise that when the white liberals who mainly run our society, accuse their enemies, such as the BNP, of bigotry, that its just hearsay, unless the BNP admit to not liking someone based on reason and experience.
I didn’t say the everyday use of words by people who believed in their application were right did I…. i just said they used them :D
@pikey wrote:
At what point, if any, would you take up arms against your nation’s government?
A nation’s government or what a nations government stands for?
Big difference y’see
@emmalush wrote:
@drivel wrote:
We are committing Cultural Suicide
We?
A show of hands if you will, all those who voted for mass multicultural disaster raise your hands? Blimey, theres a lot of hands raised in parliament, none outside…
Why wernt we allowed a vote to decide the cultural make up of our society? Ok, we got one at the ballot box, but did we VOTE mass immigration, or did we vote for the benefit of schools, police funding, a better health service etc.
You should be very careful in asking for votes on issues such as the “make up” of a society. You may wish to demonise those who aren’t anglo saxon Emma but, trust me, it isn’t a big leap to demonise those who are gay, disabled or who don’t “fit in”.
With effective and targeted propoganda (which the BNP excel at), society will turn against any group/section in our society. The Nazi regime managed to convince an entire nation that the Jews and Slavs were subhuman scum worthy of nothing more than extermination.
It’s a slippewy slope to wack and wuin
