Narcissist

@camel_blue wrote:

Could be wrong but is it T -ina – thin calls her Tuna? :twisted:

Of course, this is also a good theory, however, t_ina is not much of a talker in the room and I’d have thought would have been under the radar

@Wordsworth50 wrote:

Another quality offering! I still haven’t worked out who Tuna-Mary is!

it’s tinamry, or at least that’s who came to mind when I read it

@eve wrote:

Am I the only person who is not finding the “mini series ” threads amusing?

Not only are they almost taking over the boards to the exclusion of ordinary , interesting threads but I find them distasteful, hurtful and totally unnecessary.

I get the impression that the people ( or person) writing them is attempting to get rid of a lot of bile and vindictiveness from their system but doesnt have the courage of their convictions to do so in the name they ( or he/she) normally use in either JC or on the boards.

Well said =D>

@jen_jen wrote:

If the “storytellers” made the observations outside the guise of a story they’d be lynched, but because it’s a story we’re all supposed to lighten up and take it as humour. If it was genuinely humour with no malice or ill intent, they’d have no reason to hide and no qualms about letting people know their chatnames.

Very true

@mrs_teapot wrote:

I was concerned people mentioned might be offended but I spoke to the main character and he wasn’t concerned in the least so why should we be?

I was told different on that score :? Of course why should anyone else who’s not in the story be concerned :roll: Still, gives people something else to gossip about

@andymcnabb wrote:

People continually wish for the boards to be fresh and new, but when some one publishes or posts something authentic, they want at get up in arms and say that is about this person or that…… Maybe make a choice, either you want something that is prompting new thought and discussion or you want to stick with the drivel and hot chocolate posted by the usual threads……..

This is your idea of fresh and new :shock: I thought this was just drivel :lol: And as for authentic you must be mistaken. It is not of undisputed origin but of gossip and hearsay

@annette-curtain wrote:

* wonders if a competition is going on now for the best story* :-k

just another jumping on the bandwagon

the first series is funny but it’s just becoming repetative drivel now

ahh we posted at the same time, I hadn’t been referring to that

Living in France I’d have thought anc would have known that phrase well :?

Je pense qu’elle n’a pas, apres tout :-k

@kent f OBE wrote:

Unless the child has been born with male and female genetalia, in that case there was no need to go public in the first place. :roll:

It could be just that. It’s a rare occurance and often when it does occur the parents make the decision as to which sex the child should be at a very early age; this isn’t the right thing to do as again it more often than not turns out to be the wrong choice. It is reported that children born this way need to develop for some years until the dominant gene becomes apparant and psychologically the child discovers their true gender.

That said, it is a tough decision to make ( even though it appears quite insane as no definite reason has been given ) and a hard secret for a child to keep as it grows up.

Football

can’t think of anything worse than waking up next to someone & not being able to remember their name, or how you met, or why they’re dead

[Author]

Posts