TheNorfolkMafia

Well take a look lol

whats your answer to the orbit quiz

If they both start at the same time like runners going round a circuit , the question is asking when does the quicker satellite lap  /pass the slower one so as it takes 4 years and 8 months to lap it – that is the answer. If your answer is 27 months in some kind of quiz book – it’s wrong.  It takes 3 years for the quicker satellite to complete o…[Read more]

I cant see how this is correct – think about it , if one satellite ( the faster one ) takes 3 years to orbit the earth then using common sense it must take at least 3 years before it begins a second circuit  in order to lap the slower moving one  and line up with it again.

4 years  8 months later  or accounting for  fluctuations  in time dilation relativity 4 years 7 months 30 days 23 hours 56 minutes later  as a minimum due to the slower moving object  effectively encounter a differing period of time contrary to the faster one (  theory of relativity ).

A chemist provides number 3

In answer to the question , what was the first number one of 1950 , the answer would be there wasn’t one as the charts hadn’t begun. Just looking when I started my chart journey and it was indeed 1952 so early fifties not late fifties

Thats the beauty of youtube, every hit from the beginning of time is on there meaning the days of buying cds/cassettes isn’t necessary anymore. You simply download it to MP3 format and it’s stored on your computer indefinitely .

I’m going through every top 40 hit from the beginning of time at the moment and have been for the last few months. I basically find the hit on a site called ” everyhit.com”, search for it in youtube where every one  lies bar one I think and listen to it noting down the decent ones. I started when the charts began ( uk) in the late 50s and am…[Read more]

Problem is with the cassettes they all get chewed up , mine did anyway . My first one was michael jacksons bad around 1988 I think- an old black and white coloured one

£ 116

I’d sooner have threads like this rather than people starting threads in caps lock about someone calling someone a ” name ” in a chatroom with the logs to prove it. These threads  at least provide some mental stimulation whilst other conversations  would lead to the brain of an inebriated  chimp to enter the stagnation phase.

After considering your 100 door analogy, your logic is sound. It’s divided Maths PHD students so no wonder it’s up for debate on here. Mr Q I would say dracs 100 door analogy proves we are talking bollocks , second time tonight for me after the “tap ” question.   It’s a truly bizarre scenario but the logic is irrefutable , switching doors…[Read more]

Basically what I am saying is the first doors fixed 33.3% probability chance now alters when the third door is opened and the fixed chance of 33.3% of door 3 gets split between door 1 and 2 equally creating a 50/50.

I understand the logic of what you have written but can’t correlate it with the basic premise of there being two doors with an equal chance of the goat or car being behind either. I have an issue with the “fixed probability” chance of the original door which must surely like the second door now alter in probability. Just because the initial…[Read more]

You have redeemed yourself drac from the goat shame.. I knew you had it in you

Impressive answer drac, my answer is based on the “one tap system ” taking a mean measurement from both taps but of course the question states ” both taps are on” not that they are ” feeding into one ” so retract the 81 minutes in shame 

To summarise then , you believe if someone is left with 2 doors with a car behind one, there is a better chance of getting the car by switching doors. Aside from the computer programme, can you offer a logical explanation as to why?

I thought you were brighter than this drac, what do you think is the answer to this question out of curiosity ?

Running a bath (quiz)

Allow drac to answer this mister Q before giving the answer please