[ubermik]

Actually I think theres a conspiracy theory in there somewhere that perhaps he was killed off by a secret black ops division of the SAS………..

As with any good conspiracy theory I dont have any evidence to back it up, but I did overhear someone in a pub say that once the government had phased out all of the £20 notes they would be getting rid of the old tenners next :O:O:O

[ubermik]

@sweetass wrote:

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

@sweetass wrote:

IF MADDIE ( im touching wood ) has been killed…. Double standards I say

Don’t think you quite meant to say it like that Pebbles :wink: :P :shock:

Oh dear God you really are senile Sourass…if you would care to recheck, I think you’ll find Mary said that, not me :lol: :lol:

Apologies Pebbles :wink: :wink: :lol:

I’m still “undulating fun pillow”tering a the “sourass” comment :lol:

Oops, I meant titering at it :oops: Flipping typos :lol:

[ubermik]

On a serious note tho, I ant see why this would change anyones mind about ordering a russian bride. Unless people were going to attempt to claim this kind of thing would be impossible for a british woman to do even without the justification of 3 years forced cohabitation as a mitigating factor I cant see what difference it makes

All the other advantages of imported brides would still hold true in comparison to a western woman and this sort of rareity is no less likely to happen with an english woman anyway, so overall the russian bride would still be the better choice on average

[ubermik]

@abitofmary_j wrote:

MOSCOW (Non Rutters) – Asked if the man would make a fukk recovery, a police spokeswoman said it was “difficult to predicked, or should that be postdicked?”.

The attack climaxed (some people climax far too easily dont they? lol) three years of acrimonious enforced co-habitation. The couple divorced three years ago but continued to share a small flat (and a streamlined groin now lol), something common in Russia where property costs are very high.

In my defence I was bored lol :lol:

Well thats my excuse and I’m sticky with it :lol:

[ubermik]

@sweetass wrote:

IF MADDIE ( im touching wood ) has been killed…. Double standards I say

Don’t think you quite meant to say it like that Pebbles :wink: :P :shock:

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Theres some quite dark and debached things in the world that do cause me to have an erection to touch, but the thought that a little girl might be dead certainly isnt one of them :shock:

Or did she mean a different kind of “wood”? :lol:

[ubermik]

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

But I am sure that grandmother niether trained that dog to eat kids nor did she deliberately set the dog on the child, but the same as with this case her woeful negligence resulted in a childs death

So if there isnt already a crime of killing by negligence there bloody well should be

And as for the alternative of people totally ignoring that it WAS blatantly self absorbed negligence and not even an “accident” that caused maddy to be able to be abducted, if thats indeed what happened, but instead of stating the obvious showering unfit selfish parents with knee jerk indoctrinated pavlovian responses of symapthy and bitten tongues what message does that send out???

The message that its perfectly ok to treat your kids like a toaster and just abandon them when ever they are an inconvenience to your social life, and that IF god forbid something bad happens to them you wont have to worry about criticism or even having to face the music over what you have done because YOU rather than the child whose death you caused will in our pathetically victim stroking society will be the victim, not the child

Nah, there are already enough parents who treat their kids no more than a fashion accessory and see them and inconveniences when they interfere with their “fun”, and by pandering to such parents when their luck runs out wont exactly help in fixing that problem will it?

But, if its such a good approach to punishment would people who support that want it also applied to rapists, child molesters, burglars, drunk drivers and any other person who not by actual design happens to kill someone?

I wonder how many people would have such a pathetic weak view on this case if

a) it had ONLY been the dad who had left her rather than a couple
b) if she had been an only child, so them still being parents didnt cloud the issue

and the biggy,,,,,

c) if they werent the parents, but another family member or friend who had taken them on holiday and just left them alone

The last one is the more interesting really, as although many will CLAIM they would be JUST as sympathetic to the people who left her if they WERENT the parents just to maintain face and some facade of consistency I dont really think if honesty was expressed many people would be just as ready to hug and stroke them for leaving her alone and allowing this to happen

And if that is the case then why? Surely it should be MORE expected for the parents to take every precaution than someone who isnt that childs parent but I would lay good odds that if it was non parents to the child that had done this lynching or prosecution would be a far more common “rewards” for their action even tho they have far less reason TO be protective towards the child as it isnt even theirs

But because its the parents themselves it causes a socially indoctrinated contradictive impasse

[ubermik]

@hermangrrrman! wrote:

@forumhostgm wrote:

The “click” is where groups of users don’t talk to new people in a room.

The word you are looking for is CLIQUE NOT “CLICK” YOU FU.CKING EEJIT.

GO BUY A THESAURUS MORON.

:lol: :lol: :lol: Dont say that to him GM, his that thick he’ll probably go to a museum to find a thesaurus :shock:

I thought they were all killed off by an asteroid collision 65 million years ago too actually along with all the other dinnersores :shock:

[ubermik]

@Hedda vereals wrote:

@dead_on_arrvial wrote:

People ask me Doa why are you so nasty?

There a simple answer, years of watching the people on this site.

When I think about it, a conversation with an old reg call “Alex m 19 us” at 3am sums it up.

He put people into 3 groups:

Desperate

Isolated

Attention seekers

I believe its true of all forums, there are always people bring their personal lives into the rooms.

They talk about their kids and families to compete strangers without any thought of consequent.

After all there is no way of validating their stories

And they always have the “click”

The “click” is more of a forum 3 thing.

The “click” is where groups of users don’t talk to new people in a room.

Personally I think its one of the nastiest things to do.

There have been times when I have watch them all pick on the same person for no reason, other than there bored, while a chatguide sits and watches.

And where to start with the chatguides? Lets try recruitment.

Picking monitor from your msn list is always a mistake.

But for years they have done it on this site, most of the chatguides recommend people who are on their msn list or they know from the room.

This policy has not produced impersonal impartial room monitors.

So has for me, I will continue to annoy, bug and abuse, its better than hearing about your sad little lives.

ohhhhhhhhhh DOA has for you my darling you can bug me anytime xpxpx i promise not to broadcast that wonderful time we had last saturday in Brighton, we walked hand in hand down the sea front, you then took me to the best restaurant, wined and dined me and expected nothing in return save a small kiss on the cheek when you walked me home, ahhhhhhh. Please dont let them tell you you are nasty cos I know different my love xpxpxpxxpxp

Awww thats so sweet, DOA has set up a second profile so he would have someone to talk to :lol: :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

@forumhostpb wrote:

Didn’t we do this topic to death recently?

As I recall it was so interesting that few if any bothered to respond.

Assuming JC has been around for quite a while wouldnt it be the case that pretty much EVER topic will infact be a reappearance tho?

But as social views change, as people come and go, or cum and go even on such places no two discussions on the same topic are ever identical

And as with all topics (excluding a few unfathomable retards obviously) people just tend to skip past topics that dont interest them anyway meaning each will be or wont be posted on by personal choice anyway so they tend to sink or swim based on the level of interest they generate needing little other scrutiny whatsoever

But obviously if you were bored its understandable hehe :wink:

“And remember, we couldnt really give a toss, but we wont, infact CANT admit it” more acurate?? lol :lol:

[ubermik]

OH no, someone please tell me this CANT be true?

I just dont know how I would cope if he WAS dead

Its just too shocking to contemplate

The thought of an endless media stream of his music if that were the case would just be far too much to stand lol

[Author]

Posts