[ubermik]

Its time western coun tries banned ALL imports from countries that dont have similar working conditions to our own

For years we have had to endure the pathetic hollow foundationless whining of mamby pamby hippies about “fair trade” and level playing fields in connection with uncivilised shit holes like africa, but they are too busy hating their own heritage and countries to apply the exact same ethos of “fair trade” when its backwards countries stealing the market place because our level of holiday, pay, sick pay, maternity leave, health and safety et al mean we cant compete with sweat shops and countries where labour is paid pittance

So in the interest of fair trade we SHOULDNT allow imports of any goods from any country that doesnt meet a similar standard of working codes and standards of pay and entitlement for its workforce and maybe then we would have a government that would be creating and protecting british jobs and the people they are supposed to represent rather than one that seems intent on making other countries rich and strong at the expense of our own

[ubermik]

Perhaps both

Very few resignations in politics arent the result of someone being threatened with the outing of a scandal or merely being sacked anyway

[ubermik]

The pope could actually “chip in” far more effectively by using his extensive network of paedos (the catholic church) to see if any of their members or friends of their members know who has/had/of is “having” her

[ubermik]

No I dont :lol:

Anyhoo, thats far more typically a female trait, and stating an action as negative when someone else does it that you do yourself is a tad hypocritical really as only total morons wont see how transparent a manipulative action that is :wink:

[ubermik]

No you dont, I bet you dont even have a case that needs resting lol :lol:

[ubermik]

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

Am not

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

such an argumentative soul :roll:

Oh no I’m not, so ner ner na ner ner :P :lol:

[ubermik]

Am not

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

@sweetass wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

Seriously tho, the article seems a bit vague really

Firstly it doesnt say when this “year” they talk about starts and ends, we could be one week into it or we could be eleven months through it which would massively alter the seriousness of the scare mongering

They also I noticed seem to skip past the quite possible reason for such a jump, oddly enough the exact same reason we have also over the last 10 years had massive curve breaking jumps in diseases like measles, mumps, small pox, chicken pox, Hepatitis B and C, Aids and HIV. Because immigrants are allowed to come here without any medical screening from countries with either no vaccination policies and no decent health care system and then show up on our figures as tho theres been some change in OUR practices

But if you want to REALLY see some scary NHS proposals then swing a look at their plans to make HIV/AIDs tests compulsory for pregnant women, then look at the fact that all of the HIV tests are flawed and false positives run at about 50-60 % even on normal healthy people BUT shoot up to as high as 80-90% with pregnant women and pretty much anyone who has had a blood transfusion or taken any form of antibiotics

And then cast a glance at the treatments they will, if found to test positive (which 80-90% of the time will be incorect) HAVE to take and see what the deformity and foetal mortality rates are when taking those treatments which again run at about 80-90% with some of them

Infact one of the common drugs used for treatment is AZT, which was and still is banned from even being given to livestock, but for some strange and inexplicable reason is commonly given to diagnosed HIV or AIDs sufferers. but because of the type of drug it is has an almost total chance of negatively affecting the development of a foetus as it rearranges DNA and RNA base pair sequences which is about the worst thing that can happen to a growing developing baby as they are still being used to actually form its biomatter into a human being

And yet both the US and the UK are planning to force the tests and treatment which could have massive and decimating outcomes for pregnant women if introduced

and then you will have a real and actual travesty rather than a mere theorised and possibly exagerated one to worry about :)

Being an ex nurse I can tell you they’ve been doing random HIV tests on pregnant women for atleast 13 years now .. whats scary about that is, they no some women have the HIV virus .. but they don’t know who it is and therefore have been unable to inform the affected women … usually these women were unaware of their status… how many more people have been infected because of this :?:

Easy answer

NONE

Because its not even a virus and there isnt a single proven communicated case of aids OR HIV thats ever been recorded or proven :lol:

[ubermik]

Seriously tho, the article seems a bit vague really

Firstly it doesnt say when this “year” they talk about starts and ends, we could be one week into it or we could be eleven months through it which would massively alter the seriousness of the scare mongering

They also I noticed seem to skip past the quite possible reason for such a jump, oddly enough the exact same reason we have also over the last 10 years had massive curve breaking jumps in diseases like measles, mumps, small pox, chicken pox, Hepatitis B and C, Aids and HIV. Because immigrants are allowed to come here without any medical screening from countries with either no vaccination policies and no decent health care system and then show up on our figures as tho theres been some change in OUR practices

But if you want to REALLY see some scary NHS proposals then swing a look at their plans to make HIV/AIDs tests compulsory for pregnant women, then look at the fact that all of the HIV tests are flawed and false positives run at about 50-60 % even on normal healthy people BUT shoot up to as high as 80-90% with pregnant women and pretty much anyone who has had a blood transfusion or taken any form of antibiotics

And then cast a glance at the treatments they will, if found to test positive (which 80-90% of the time will be incorect) HAVE to take and see what the deformity and foetal mortality rates are when taking those treatments which again run at about 80-90% with some of them

Infact one of the common drugs used for treatment is AZT, which was and still is banned from even being given to livestock, but for some strange and inexplicable reason is commonly given to diagnosed HIV or AIDs sufferers. but because of the type of drug it is has an almost total chance of negatively affecting the development of a foetus as it rearranges DNA and RNA base pair sequences which is about the worst thing that can happen to a growing developing baby as they are still being used to actually form its biomatter into a human being

And yet both the US and the UK are planning to force the tests and treatment which could have massive and decimating outcomes for pregnant women if introduced

and then you will have a real and actual travesty rather than a mere theorised and possibly exagerated one to worry about :)

[ubermik]

My son wanted MMR when he was about 5 but we decided against it

We thought that as he tended to break his toys quite quickly and lose parts off them that it wouldnt really be a wise choice to let him have an MMR

Instead we pursuaded him to have a fairly large remote control car about the size of a shoe box which was quite sturdily built and would be less likely to be left lying around, trodden on and smashed as would have been VERY likely with a teensy weensy Mega Midget Racer :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Author]

Posts