@forumhostpb wrote:
Well I was referring to the High Court judgement this week that allowed a divorced wife to claim a substantial share in her husband’s assets even though she had not contributed directly to their acquisition. The fact that she had given up a potential carreer to be married entitled her to a big payout from his assets, even though only being married a relatively short period of time.
It is said that pre-nuptial agreements could get round this by setting out a ”fair share” of the assets before the marriage took place – even though these agreements are not directly recognised in English matrimonial law.
So it seemed to me that Witey and Gizmo ought to consider a ‘pre nup’ before they get married so that when they get divorced shortly afterwards , they won’t fight over the assets.
but then i can understand the scepticism BUT as i pointed out we both been in long term relationships before but with total idiots who didnt know how to keep a relationship going but we both know how to hold a relationship together and there for to put your doubts to rest we are confident as a couple that it will work and i also must point out the fact we arnt getting married until next year even though we are already are engeaged we arnt rushing into marraige so lay your doubts to rest love can happen on JC and has b4 i know of at least two couples who have been together for a long time living together who met on JC so it does happen :roll: :roll: :roll: