Bombs Away??

Just letting people know who runs the independent ge I hope that’s ok.

Your comments on poking the Russian bear sounded very familiar to nigel farages in the telegraph ge.

Wouldn’t let ge copy my homework.

Futhermore ge I’m very surprised to find you quoting nigel farage.

milkman of human kindness wrote:

Futhermore ge I’m very surprised to find you quoting nigel farage.

What makes me smile about you Milkman, because you have NEVER heard the phrase “poke/prod the Russian bear” you assume no one else has either. You have no idea it has been used widely for decades since the cold war and probably much longer.

Milkman logic.

Ge wrote:

the tory regime sold chemicals to Syrian regime known to be used to make chemical weapons?

That’s almost irrelevant. Because we sell them chemicals, it doesn’t mean they should make weapons from it and kill their own people, or that we advocate, approve, endorse or encourage them to do so. In this day and age, Leaders using chemical weapons on their own people is NOT a very common practice, and NOT something you’d expect of someone when selling then chemicals. What if Iceland sold them the chemicals, what difference would that have made? Weapons could be made of anything. Should we not sell them steel or titanium? How do you know the Syrians didn’t “promise” to not make weapons with it? Maybe they lured us into selling them crop fertilisers. Too many unkowns.What if they made a dirty bomb in a suitcase that was made in London, and nuked London. That would be our fault too for making good suitcases?

Too many unkowns.

Besides, weapons are useful, good business, and we are good merchants and tradesmen, we are good weapons manufactures and suppliers, known for it the world over. Our weapons we make have preserved more lives than they have taken.

• This reply was modified 6 years ago by  Morgan..

milkman of human kindness wrote:

Ok ge if the independent is that well respected why is it ranked at number 15 out of 18 daily newspapers? Well respected by who? Certainly not the british public it seems. My point being your source is untrustyworthy and no doubt biased.

Your going off on a random road to nowhere Milkman. Milkman logic.

It doesn’t alter the indisputable FACT that the tory regime sold chemicals to the Syrian regime knowing they were using those chemicals to make chemical weapons.

milkman of human kindness wrote:

Ges got a snippet of information from a newspaper and hes acting like he discovered all of this.

I am still laughing, hysterically, that you claim the Daily Star is a newspaper.