-
Posts
-
@emmalush wrote:
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
Fuelling inflation is not about fuel prices. (Though they do contribute}.
:roll: Now i understand the others who describe so bad.
YOU mentioned fuel inflation as a problem…
No emma. I said that your proposal to “…pay public sector workers a fair rate, and businesses only eligable to pay people a fair wage.” would fuel inflation.
Fuel as in add to. Where’s your dictionary when you need it emma?@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
Fuel as in add to.
:D I wondered what the hell you were onabout…
So, lets pretend we indulge ourselves through mass immigration, eventually the wage demand with create higher inflation, if theres no immigration left to take in, what would we do then?
rubyred, who is going to put a halt to this madness?
@rubyred wrote:
emma….I dont know darling, (serious) ..
Try process of elimination? Go through each organisation you know until you find one.
@rubyred wrote:
ems it wont be the answer ya might have wanted honey….Im a great believer in the writing of Tony Benn,,,my entire heritage would never allow me to vote b,n.p…but i MUST say i DONT blame folks if they do,,the time is unfortunately RIGHT got the far right,,my old boss used to warn me about this,,i laughed him off,,and called him a fascist ( he WAS) ,,but everything he said 25 yers ago is coming true,,(scared)
This “im more worried that the turks and bulgarians et al…want a wee job..ffs my own son cant get a job..” meant nothing then…
No such thing as “far right”, in political terms.
Emma you have a “Let them eat cake” attitude towards the issue of salaries. You say that employers should just pay more money for jobs like crop-picking and cleaning and then there wouldn’t be a shortage of native people wanting to do jobs like that. It’s an unrealistic attitude because the world doesn’t work like that. You talk as if money grows on trees and that paying attractive salaries (i.e. far more than the minimum wage) is something that every employer can do. Even if a law were to be passed forcing employers to pay attractive salaries for something like factory work what you would find is that companies would relocate to another country to reduce their costs. The result of that would be an increase in unemployment.
So yet again it’s clear that BNP policies don’t stand up to the least bit of scrutiny. It’s all crap formulated by idiots for the benefit of morons.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Emma you have a “Let them eat cake” attitude towards the issue of salaries. You say that employers should just pay more money for jobs like crop-picking and cleaning and then there wouldn’t be a shortage of native people wanting to do jobs like that. It’s an unrealistic attitude because the world doesn’t work like that.
I agree, but why cant it? Why dont we love cleanliness, why dont we wana pay for good health. Crop picking is physically hard work, people deserve more money. How does an MP deserve £60,000, plus loads of expensies a year, and a crop picker £10,000 a year, doesnt make sense.
You talk as if money grows on trees and that paying attractive salaries (i.e. far more than the minimum wage) is something that every employer can do.
They can, but the pickers are desperate for work, the employers know this.
Even if a law were to be passed forcing employers to pay attractive salaries for something like factory work what you would find is that companies would relocate to another country to reduce their costs. The result of that would be an increase in unemployment.
Who would then buy their product if we have mass unemployment…
So yet again it’s clear that BNP policies don’t stand up to the least bit of scrutiny.
What BNP policies you onabout?
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!