PARENTS WITH GAY KIDS ON DRUGS

@irish_lucy wrote:

As for the Thread, its a good topic for debate, just shame it does seem as personal attack on someone but then again neither side are the quiet types.

They may not be quiet types, and some people may enjoy needling each other and calling it banter and that’s up to them, but to bring peoples children into it is really sinking to the lowest level in my opinion. And the person who is feeding Cosy the information, giving him the loaded gun knowing that he will use it, is as low as him.

Cosy in case you’ve forgotten, you have already been banned once and come back in a different name. You are starting to sink to the same depths that got you banned the first time around. Do you really think you’re going to get a sympathetic hearing from anyone?

i’ve read this thread from page 1 right through to here ………..and I can honestly say I havent got the foggiest idea what is going on

:lol:

……..and thats probably the best way!

@best man wrote:

for the last time jen im not getting fed any info,im merely stating a topic i read in the paper
so stop adding fuel to the fire.
it wasnt meant to any regs/members/lurkers in here
oh while im here how come so many lurkers sign into you know where site,you join just so you cann read rants and raves
but you never say anything you darent.

Of course you’re not getting fed any information Cosy, of course it isn’t meant to be anyone in here, you’re as pure as the driven white snow. If it was in a paper then it will be available online, so you can provide a link can’t you? Or tell me what paper and when and I’ll find the link. Except of course there won’t be one because there isn’t an article of that ilk in any papers.

As for the other site, I can certainly say that I haven’t joined up…someone did join up using my name though, not sure if they’ve ever posted, so if I do ever decide to join I’ll have to use my chat name rather than my board name. I won’t feel the need to hide though.

@best man wrote:

my take on this is yeh ruby we are always going to get the grammar police on i:e su being the latest member,who think its clever to pull up evrybody on their latest spelling mistake.she has picked me up twice now 1,oxymoron,2 ,has
i think what su doesnt understand is,a lot of people type how we think ,ala accents
myself,ruby,and mad fooka were /are deft exponents of this
im not going to change my type of typing for her
if you dont like it su,dont read it its simps
maybe sue we arent all blessed with your superior intelligence

1. Not grammar police … pedant, there is a difference; the difference being that I am the one with ‘issues’, which I did say! :)
2. Not the ‘latest’ anything .. I am unique, not part of a crowd/gang/witchhunt, whatever
3. Thrice … twice for oxymoron, separate threads, once has
4. I ‘understand’ perfectly well … i like the ‘accents’ :)
5. Never asked you to change your typing .. but thanks for considering it
6. How can I decide if I like or not, without reading
7. Thanks for saying I’m intelligent
8. Thanks for classing it as ‘superior’ :)
9. It’s ‘Su’ .. without the ‘e’
10. xx