Questions for Emma

@emmalush wrote:

I can only give my personal opinion to the above questions. I and the following answers are NOT representative of any political belief system. Some answers are not 100% yes or no, but i can only answer yes or no :D

1. yes.
2. no.
3. no.
4. no.
5. yes.
6. no.

Be interesting to read the BNP’s answers of the above, though i doubt you’d get 6 yes or no answers.

Other posters, try it, its fun. What would your answers be genie?

Thank you Emma, so from this you no longer wish an end to multiculturalism, simply an end to immigration into England from any other country. So, multiculturalism is no longer part of our debate.
By proxy, All other countries as a result should end English migration into their country, we must be fair after all.
I could not answer them, because i embrace multiculturalism and welcome it.

I have just realised, these answers mean an American man with an English wife couldn’t emmigrate to England, the political ramifications could be devastating…hmmm, interesting.

@emmalush wrote:

@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:

Thank you Emma, so from this you no longer wish an end to multiculturalism, simply an end to immigration into England from any other country.

Shame you didn’t ask for a when and how to end the multicultural nightmare…im hardly going to say yes, we should kick em out, that would be stupid, so i answer no, which is not a 100% correct answer…

By proxy, All other countries as a result should end English migration into their country, we must be fair after all.

Fine by me, long live Nationalistic paganism.

I could not answer them, because i embrace multiculturalism and welcome it.

Hopefully not, but one day you will suffer it. You may already have, but are scared to say. Cant be fair for your taxes to be spent on non white and gay sex organisations, but not white and straight sex organisations?

A new question then.
How do you propose bringing about an end to multiculturalism?

@emmalush wrote:

@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:

A new question then.
How do you propose bringing about an end to multiculturalism?

You invite those people’s who have become part of the extended 1948 society of England to leave. Regardless of whether they will or not, you concentrate on a prodomanent belief system. English, non religious (if possible) white and hetrosexual.

This will happen in time, but when it does, it will be after a nightmare of innocent deaths forced upon us by the old gang, who only see their own personal comforts in life, and dont give a rats about the minorities the claim to represent, the minorites in our society are the old gangs political wand.

Wouldn’t it be great if atleast 99.9% of us loved mass multiculturalism. Isnt it also great, that we humans have individual thoughts that dont always go along with those who run society.

Not many would take up that “invitation” unless the word “invitation” is being used in place of “forced”.

1/ How would this SPECIFICALLY be encouraged?

2/ Where would you want WASPS to go? (“non-religious” would surely include Protestants).

3/ Where would you “invite” an English homosexual to go?

@emmalush wrote:

@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:

1/ How would this SPECIFICALLY be encouraged?

2/ Where would you want WASPS to go? (“non-religious” would surely include Protestants).

3/ Where would you “invite” an English homosexual to go?

1. Finance, we waste billions on EU membership. We waste gord knows how many millions on asylum seekers etc. We waste hundreds of thousands on minority projects like black associations, the CRE etc. The war has cost us how many billions ££££££ We waste money hirring non English unemployed. We have created a society that encourages people to go from regular unemployment to sick benefit. Just what have those who voted New Labour done to us…

2. The fanatisism of humans and religious belief is very difficult to stop. You would simply have to refuse religious belief as part of our political society, and people would have to understand that mass religion doesn’t suit society. If it got out of hand like now, then you’d have to abolish it publicly.

3. Evidently, sexual preference is something you cannot stop. It would be something, like religious belief, that wouldn’t be promoted.

This whole thing is not easy, but the current make-up of our society is worse. You will never please everyone all the time, but you can work towards pleasing the majority most of the time. The more diverse we become, the worse it gets.

I think i read in Denmark and Sweeden recently, they’ve stopped immigration to asses where they go from now on? Malmo is Sweeden is a islamic melting pot, the police struggle to cope with muslims. They live in areas where poverty has become riffe, and its not because they want it that way, its because the Sweeds dont mix.

Were constantly funding minority projects in England, because they usually find themselves in the poorest communities without jobs, but were told they are like us living side by side as a lovely multicultural country, its farce spin to blag a vote or 8 million…

1/ Not relevent, you didn’t answer the question.

2/ So you would abolish religion out of hand, hmmm, what about all the “decent hard working English people” who happen to believe in Christianity, or are CofE, or protestants?
You do realise that the more you talk, the more voters are losing. You should join the BNP and become a leading voice for them Emma, with your ramblings aiding their cause, within a month, support would dwindle so rapidly, the BNP would be merely a memory.

You still didn’t answer the question, WHERE would they go?

3/ So your not going to promote it, so you believe a man or woman wakes up one day and says “hmmm my wife/husband is annoying me, i think i’ll sleep with someone of the same sex as me”, promotion has nothing to do with homosexuality, acceptance is the message not “Go on, be gay…you know you want to”. Your non-promotion of it will change nothing so why cite it in your agenda…pointless.

It seems, your against multiculturalism, but if the BNP were in power we would still be multicultural.

Your against homosexuality, but if the BNP were in power, there would be no difference with the amount of homosexuality.

Your against religious belief, but if the BNP were in power, religious belief would still be here.

It seems to me, the BNP is the wrong party for your beliefs.

ps You managed spectacuarly to avoid answering any of the specific questions, well done, you are a true BNP supporter.