Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
OMG. It’s now 2. :P
What a Goalkeeping Howler! :lol: A Primary School Goalie would have nabbed that.
@anita Gofradump wrote:
@Bad Manners wrote:
@anita Gofradump wrote:
@Bad Manners wrote:
We’re basically out due to one of the worst refereing decision’s in the history of Football that led to Italy’s second goal. I’ve saw the incident again, and it’s a ludicrious horrendous decision.
We should certainly still have a big interest going into the Ukraine-France game.In the cold light of day it’s been a great campaign though, and our seedings gone way up now, so we wont have the same sort of Draconian Qualifying Group for the World Cup.
You was only in with a chance due to the linesmen’s equally poor judgement in allowing the scottish goal, and not allowing the italian goal that was ruled out, nobody but yourselves to blame.
England wont do any good at the Euro’s anyway so not like we got anything to cheer about.
What ya talking about ya Numpty?
The Scottish goal was a perfectly legal goal. You obviously know something I dont, so why dont you tell us why you think it wasnt a perfectly legal goal.
The reason the Italian “goal” wasnt allowed was because of a clear handball in the lead up to it.The reason being you nobjockey, is the player who scored it was offside, as Andy Gray, And Gary McCallister repeatedly kept pointing out, but maybe they was not commentating on the game you was watching, and the replays showed he was offside and the linesmen is a nob for not doing his job. So unless you think the offside rule does not apply to Scotland, the goal should not have stood, As for the Italian goal, i did not actually see it i was making a drink, but i do recall them saying it should of stood and the linesmen again made a mess of it. So if the linesmen had of done his job in the first place Scotland would still be out!
I’m suprised the game was allowed to played in the first place looking at the state of the pitch and the weather.There were quite a few debatable decisions for both sides.
Emphasis on the word Debatable. There are debatable decisions in every game, in every Country, every weekend. The Referee and Linesman sometimes miss things. That’s the way it is.
There’s absolutely no way the Hutton free kick could be called DEBATABLE though. The Italian almost halfed him in two, in clear view of the Ref and Linesman.
It was a no brainer, and it wasnt as if the Officials missed the Incident. Therefore the Officials were woefully incompotent in giving the free kick the other way.Anyway that’s history now. Let’s all get behind Croatia, err I mean England tonight.
:wink:@anita Gofradump wrote:
@Bad Manners wrote:
We’re basically out due to one of the worst refereing decision’s in the history of Football that led to Italy’s second goal. I’ve saw the incident again, and it’s a ludicrious horrendous decision.
We should certainly still have a big interest going into the Ukraine-France game.In the cold light of day it’s been a great campaign though, and our seedings gone way up now, so we wont have the same sort of Draconian Qualifying Group for the World Cup.
You was only in with a chance due to the linesmen’s equally poor judgement in allowing the scottish goal, and not allowing the italian goal that was ruled out, nobody but yourselves to blame.
England wont do any good at the Euro’s anyway so not like we got anything to cheer about.
What ya talking about ya Numpty?
The Scottish goal was a perfectly legal goal. You obviously know something I dont, so why dont you tell us why you think it wasnt a perfectly legal goal.
The reason the Italian “goal” wasnt allowed was because of a clear handball in the lead up to it.We’re basically out due to one of the worst refereing decision’s in the history of Football that led to Italy’s second goal. I’ve saw the incident again, and it’s a ludicrious horrendous decision.
We should certainly still have a big interest going into the Ukraine-France game.In the cold light of day it’s been a great campaign though, and our seedings gone way up now, so we wont have the same sort of Draconian Qualifying Group for the World Cup.
Yup. I agree with Dagger.
I’m not celebrating another glorious failure, however great we’ve done to get this far.
Let’s get stuck in, and grab that victory to take us over the Finish Line.Im predicting 1-0 Scotland. :D
Because it’s none of his buisness.
He’s interfering in affairs that are none of his concern, and affairs best left to the people that are dealing with it. Let the Police get on with their job’s without the focus being taken away from the search for Madeleine.
This is just gonna make matters worse. The stupid old fool should have thought this through beforehand.
Why dosent this Lawyer busybody guy butt out as well.
If there’s evidence that the McCanns were neglectful then let the relevant authorities pursue it, not some whacko Lawyer.
@bat wrote:
Well this isn,t from a foreign tabloid BM. Just read some of the comments from people.
QUOTE:How sick was the child who required a change of bed sheets? Why would Dr. O’Brien return to the table at 10:15 if his child was so sick as to need a change of bed sheets? Where did the dirty sheets go to?
I’d like to shake the ‘Tapas Nine’ and kick their backsides, for the sake of their children.
Simple questions need simple answers!
– Vjay, London
Strange that within 40 minutes of the child going missing, they were more worried about the implications of the public knowing they’d left her alone.
– Blueboy, Stockport
Clarence Mitchell should be warned by the police to keep his nose out of the investigation and not go contacting witnesses as to what they are doing or not doing.
What business is it of his even if he is a spokesperson for the McCanns?
When are people going to realise the parents are suspects in the disappearance of their daughter and should not be allowed to issue their own PR statements like this.
– T W, London
Wonder if two ‘not so professional’ people would have had the same treatment, calls from the Prime Minister etc?
– Gill Spare, Leicestershire
What a selfish, uncaring couple the McCanns are begining to sound like. They stand their wringing their hands with sad faces, and all they can think of is ‘me, me and me’. My contempt for them grows daily.
– Karen, West Midlands
I hear, “Clarence Mitchell” and I automatically switch off.
– Anna, East Sussex
Can you imagine what the public uproar will be like if it transpires that the Tapas 9 or the McCanns have been hiding something? It doesn’t bear thinking about. How can anyone hold back information that could possibly lead to finding Maddie? I suppose by being selfish is the answer. Also, how will Clarence Mitchell deal with that one?
– Flicity, UK
they should all be ashamed of their selves leaving young kids on their own hope their guilt stays with them forever
– Rita make fun of, crawley sussex
Are there not rules in the UK and Portugal which prevent representatives of two official suspects trying to find out about the content of other witnesses statements? It all seems very dubious for the Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns PR rep, to be hindering a police investigation in this way.
– Schanti, Sweden
Just one thought…how is “The police were only informed after the group in question analysed the problems they could face for having left the children alone” compatible with the independent eyewitness accounts of the minutes after Kate McCann found Madeleine was missing?
– Cynic, Berks, UK
So what? Just a bunch of busybody gossip’s, only to willing to kick people when they’re down.
How about Gemma Atkinson? What a fine speciman. Here’s a link to a photo of her in a Bikini.
:D
