[Bad Manners]

I wouldnt say there’s much if anything between St Mirren and Hamilton. I still fancy St Mirren to go down this season.

It was a shock result. Rangers have been in good form, and Saints hadnt beaten them at Love St for 20 years or something.

[Bad Manners]

@Bad Manners wrote:

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

I would say there was a lot of evidence in the Murder Trial.

Please feel free to elaborate.

I’ve served on jury service – twice – and I don’t ever recall evidence from those trials being made public.

:roll: Here on Planet Earth there was 24hr coverage of the trial, evidence and all.

Media coverage – where you’ve obviously got your information from – is infamously biased.
The jury would not have been allowed access to it for that reason alone.
Show me one bit of evidence that would’ve convinced the jury he was guilty.

Only way OJ Simpson could have been innocent is if you believe the Evidence was planted by the Police.

I would say the Evidence is overwhelming.

http://www.justicejunction.com/judicial_injustice_oj_evidence_rockingham.htm

I said back here that the only way he could be innocent is if he was framed by the Police in a Conspiracy Theory.

You said “Show me one bit of evidence that would have convinced the Jury he was guilty”.
In fact there was Mountains of irrefutable DNA Evidence, and any person looking at the evidence would see that.

[Bad Manners]

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

Nothing to do with mean Media Coverage? It was live in the Courtroom.

You said the coverage was 24/7.
Do you mean the media coverage or are you saying the trial itself was a 24 hour, 7 days a week live event?

Every second of it was televised yes.

You look at that page, and tell me honestly that you dont think there was any evidence. If you say no then your :^o will grow.

[Bad Manners]

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

I would say there was a lot of evidence in the Murder Trial.

Please feel free to elaborate.

I’ve served on jury service – twice – and I don’t ever recall evidence from those trials being made public.

:roll: Here on Planet Earth there was 24hr coverage of the trial, evidence and all.

Media coverage – where you’ve obviously got your information from – is infamously biased.
The jury would not have been allowed access to it for that reason alone.
Show me one bit of evidence that would’ve convinced the jury he was guilty.

Only way OJ Simpson could have been innocent is if you believe the Evidence was planted by the Police.

I would say the Evidence is overwhelming.

http://www.justicejunction.com/judicial_injustice_oj_evidence_rockingham.htm

[Bad Manners]

Nothing to do with mean Media Coverage? It was live in the Courtroom.

[Bad Manners]

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

I would say there was a lot of evidence in the Murder Trial.

Please feel free to elaborate.

I’ve served on jury service – twice – and I don’t ever recall evidence from those trials being made public.

:roll: Here on Planet Earth there was 24hr coverage of the trial, evidence and all.

[Bad Manners]

@sir Actor wrote:

@johnboy25 wrote:

@sir Actor wrote:

@johnboy25 wrote:

How about you get off your high horse? :lol:

Taking the moral highground with me achieves sweet FA

Can you not understand that I have absolutely no interest whatsoever in your “humour” or your well-worn cliches?

Try sticking to the topic for a change.

Sorry, I thought you mentioned it. Obviously my mistake, you wouldn’t have done that if you didn’t care.

And what exactly has this got to do with the topic that you’re so keen to stick to?

Try thinking before you speak, you’re falling all over yourself with those comments.

I’m not speaking…I’m typing.

And I’m not falling over either.
Your opinions on the topic (not on me) would be interesting to read if you actually bothered to make some.

My point of view is this;
The first time he stood trial a jury found him not guilty.
That verdict was based on the evidence put before them.

It’s all very well and clever for people to make comments on here proclaiming his guilt in the murder of his wife but where was the evidence?

This is the whole point of the judicial system in that you are innocent until proven guilty.

I would say there was a lot of evidence in the Murder Trial, but it wasnt long after the Rodney King incident, and feelings were still running high from that. Black Jury Members swung it for him.

I’ve defended other people on here in the past, but I wouldn’t defend OJ. He seems arrogant, and instead of keeping his head down, he writes a ludricrous book “If I did It”, and adds more pain to the victims families.

Plus his acting in the Naked Gun was totally shocking.

[Bad Manners]

A life sentence for what he did seems a bit Draconian.

[Bad Manners]

I refuse to post a Blah on your moronic thread.

[Bad Manners]

28th out of 200? =; What a loser. Kids these days just dont having the sporting talent that I had.

[Author]

Posts