Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@yoda wrote:
@blossom wrote:
@yoda wrote:
Well I would like to know where all these soo called new guides are when you need them.
Last night was disgusting some tosser decided to ruin the quiz that was being held and the guide who was there couldn’t cope.
If you complain you get the same old story.. ‘guides can’t be there all the time’
So how about making people guides who can be there more or less all the time.. maybe do it in shifts.
I have been saying for bloody years now.. there needs to be a guide in a chatroom at all times.. not just ‘when they feel like it’
Yes I could be one of them as I’m in the chatroom throughout the day and night and so are many others.. so why not make those that can.. guides.
I know I have been refused because of ‘my involvement with another site’ as if that should make any difference. Daft stupid rule!
However I would like to know the excuses into not making others who can be there most of the time into guides… guides who can actually be there and do their job.
I’m quite sure the guides are sick of the tossers that scroll too and to make a derogatory remark saying they cant cope I feel is unfair. As has been said they cant be here all the time and we have all noticed of late there are more of them and dont forget there are 3 forums to cover!
Maybe the reason they dont employ some of the chatters that are here all the time is the very fact that they arent up to it. Ive chatted here for a long time now and of course its annoying when these numpties bring the room to a standstill but also its equally annoying and a waste of time when people purposely goad those low life morons into a full blown argument, seems they cant help themselves.
It may be a sad fact but is it perhaps true that it is infact extremely difficult to remove these disruptors permanently. I say this as a complete techy ignoramus as I have no idea how the banning machine works really. I suggest those chatters who so fervently object to the disruption that these people cause are pro-active in forming a delegation and impart their superior knowledge to the site owners then we can all have some peace.
Hi Blossom
The fact of the matter is Guides can be there all the time. I have ran and owned numerous sites over the years, and ran a moderating company for social network sites and chatsites on this scale. If their are enough guides and they are managed properly then a site owner can moderate their chat rooms 24/7. For a successful site such as Justchat and a site on this scale not to have 24 hr moderation in their chat rooms, well there is no reasonable excuse.
Somebody made a point of them not being paid and why should they be there all the time. In answer to that, they knew they were not going to get paid when they applied for the position of chat guide. Yes one person cannot be there all the time, but many chatguides on a set timetable can be.I hear what you saying Yoda and yes I agree more guides would be a good idea but my question is would they actually be able to do anything anyway about these prolific scrollers. Most of the guides do a pretty good job and being vilified, moaned at, tricked, lied to, berated and a host of other forms of abuse wouldnt be my idea of a fun unpaid pastime.
Hand on heart I cant say Ive never taken part in a mild wind up and have been known to be a tad fiesty on occasion but of late we have seen so much antagonism within the rooms that the chatters have to take some responsibilty. How many times have we seen a heated discussion get out of hand because someone oversteps the mark and becomes downright abusive, then whines like a biatch because they are booted or banned.
Nicey nicey all the time would be very tedious but then so is constant bickering and back biting. Its a fact that some take it to heart and feel more passionate about it than others. the different philosophies are what make a chatroom. There will never be perfect harmony but sometimes a modicum of restraint could make a significant difference to the mood of the room.
@yoda wrote:
Well I would like to know where all these soo called new guides are when you need them.
Last night was disgusting some tosser decided to ruin the quiz that was being held and the guide who was there couldn’t cope.
If you complain you get the same old story.. ‘guides can’t be there all the time’
So how about making people guides who can be there more or less all the time.. maybe do it in shifts.
I have been saying for bloody years now.. there needs to be a guide in a chatroom at all times.. not just ‘when they feel like it’
Yes I could be one of them as I’m in the chatroom throughout the day and night and so are many others.. so why not make those that can.. guides.
I know I have been refused because of ‘my involvement with another site’ as if that should make any difference. Daft stupid rule!
However I would like to know the excuses into not making others who can be there most of the time into guides… guides who can actually be there and do their job.
I’m quite sure the guides are sick of the tossers that scroll too and to make a derogatory remark saying they cant cope I feel is unfair. As has been said they cant be here all the time and we have all noticed of late there are more of them and dont forget there are 3 forums to cover!
Maybe the reason they dont employ some of the chatters that are here all the time is the very fact that they arent up to it. Ive chatted here for a long time now and of course its annoying when these numpties bring the room to a standstill but also its equally annoying and a waste of time when people purposely goad those low life morons into a full blown argument, seems they cant help themselves.
It may be a sad fact but is it perhaps true that it is infact extremely difficult to remove these disruptors permanently. I say this as a complete techy ignoramus as I have no idea how the banning machine works really. I suggest those chatters who so fervently object to the disruption that these people cause are pro-active in forming a delegation and impart their superior knowledge to the site owners then we can all have some peace.
@jadey wrote:
ive been banned from f3 i think its disgusting that jack thinks he can dowot he wants and thinks he can abuse people well i was only defending myself and my children,and thanx to cherry and angledust(my sis) for helping me get back in jc love u guys xxxx
Thing is you get these gits come in ,their soul purpose is to wind people up they feed on it, people retaliate then get banned! If you sit back at laugh at the sad barstewards they get bored and sod off.
@boojangle wrote:
Ladies, ladies, ladies …. TUT TUT!!!!
You are proving what the majority of MALE say about the FEMALES of JC!!!
Bloody double standards!!! If a guy had ripped to pieces a female chatters pic like you are doin to the guy ….. there would be a bloody posse hunting him down now, his name would be thrown around the boards as a ‘vile, shallow, disgusting man who judges only on looks’ I mean come on …. us females are always wanting to be judged on our personality …. after all … its a CHAT site – what do looks matter! Maybe a little of the same courtesy shown to others would go a long way!
I’m one of the first to defend anyone who is abused/called about the way they look ….. thankfully – I’m not sexist in my opinion!
I’m becoming more and more thankful for not being a reg in Jc as I once was!!! OH how it changes people!!!
Thats all very well for you to say sat there with your nice even features, tight shiny skin and luscious lips. You dont have to worry about looking like Norman Bates with a 20watt energy saving bulb for back lighting.
And JC never changed me I’m still the same shallow, self opionated, money grabbing ol slapper i ever was!
@little miss wrote:
So you do prison visits then llittle miss!
