[Cas]

@forumhostpb wrote:

This is an appalling story which should bring a chill to the heart of any right thinking person. Sadly, the vicious abuser apparently has done this sort of thing before.

Think also of baby P’s mother who happily co-habited with this guy and surely MUST have known or suspected what her ‘boyfriend’ was capable of doing.

However, to my mind another person who should be named and shamed in this dreadful matter is Bernard Richmond QC who was the barrister representing the boyfriend of baby P’s mother (the guy that has just been convicted of raping a 2 year old child).

The Metropolitan Police have quite rightly condemned the way in which children are treated in criminal courts yesterday. This followed the disgraceful way that the poor little 4 years old was aggressively cross examined and put under intense pressure and asked a whole series of intimidating questions before being asked to define “truth”.

FFS !!!! She was only 4 years old and had been RAPED !!!! How on earth can anybody justify this sort of cross examination – even if it is necessary to provide a defence to a (now) convicted vicious child rapist!!!.

See an extract for yourself – and make your own judgement……..

Bernard Richmond QC: “Did you make it up?”

4 year old child: “I just ……….”

Bernard Richmond QC: “He didn’t touch you did he? DID HE? I have to ask you one more time. We have to have an answer from you, he didn’t touch you did he?”

All this time the little girl appeared visibly distressed, wiping her eyes and desperate to leave.

Bernard Richmond QC – you should be deeply ashamed of yourself!

So should the judge in this case PB, whoever he was, for allowing it to continue :twisted:

[Cas]

@pete wrote:

I was gonna say they’ll put him in solitary for his own protection but i’m pretty some wardens attention will be distracted “accidently”

Of course they will, Section 43 I believe it’s called. But where theres a will theres a way, and the ones that want to find it normally do :wink:

[Cas]

@pete wrote:

anyone changed their mind on the kill him issue yet ?

I’m sure theres plenty would like to see that, truth is tho, its never going to happen. Best we can hope for is that once he starts his sentence he won’t stay anally retentive for too long.

[Cas]

Do the pits, the closures, or anything else to do with the pits have anything to do with the original topic? :roll: :roll: :roll:

[Cas]

@quiet_man wrote:

@bassingbourne55 wrote:

Arguably, whatever their past histories, these two men have probably prevented a lot of killings in the last ten years plus by becoming part of the peace process. Same goes for any of the loyalist former extremists who gave peace a chance.

So the evil they committed is outweighed by the (possible) good they’ve done recently?

Why do I find it hard to care :roll:

The past can’t be changed, but the future can. Surely a solution whatever the past is better in the long run.

[Cas]

@brown bear wrote:

were are the piccys of the wedding nite Super??? lol :D :D :D :D :D xxx brown bear

[-X [-( Tut,,,,,,,,locks the norty bear in the cellar***

[Cas]

Makes yr heart bleed eh :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Cas]

I couldnt get the sound on that,,,i’m on a borrowed pc at the moment, mines sick and in the hospital

I did get the gist tho jen jen.

Waspish how and where does child abuse come into this, she’s not a child, the daughter, she’s 29.

I read tho, couple weeks ago in a magazine. The mother of a 12 yr old, who has regular pampering/manicured/pedicured/spray tanned/belly button piercing/the latest designer gear. Other kids pick on her in school, and the mothers attitude? I don’t care what those other mothers say, theyre just jealous because she’s so beautiful, their kids are all probably fat, ugly and have no personality.

Now that i’d call child abuse

[Cas]

@tictax wrote:

im talkin bowt health n safety in the wrk place , im in constuction , a few examples are scaffolders clippin on when off the ground at any height , lanyards 6 foot wudnt help u if u fell 2 foot , trigger times on drills , scabblers etc , some ur allowed to use for a matter of minutes only, these glasses they make us wear arent practicable , ok for those guys walkin around but when u workin they steam up causing a hazard bigger than the hazard they are used for in the first place , we remove them and are given warnings , i could go on forever , dunno if other work places are the same ????

I think you’ll find its creeping in everywhere.

I’m not going to say anything about majoritys and minoritys,,,lot of people though, over the last few years have become ambulance chasers, no sooner have they picked themselves up off the ground than theyre on the phone to one of them. So, the common sense part of health and safety is gone out the window, and some of the most stupid rules iv’e ever heard at times lol, in their place.

People are too scared now of being sued so theyre covering their arses :roll:

[Cas]

@pete wrote:

And nowhere did i say you did… but that just sorta proves my point and whats the point of joining a message baord if you never post ? Theres people joined yrs ago and no posts :?

And I didn’t infer you did either, just making the point clear of what I was saying. In your own words tho, if the cap fits etc etc etc.,

As for pple joining and not posting. Maybe some pple like to join just to read what others post, what difference does it make

[Author]

Posts