[cath 55]

@esmeralda wrote:

Let’s hear it for the Lynch Mob mentality..

It is the law that needs updating across all spectrums. Life should mean exactly that. Murderers and child rapists should be locked away from society for life. Keys thrown vigorously away.

Esme I agree with you. its not about having lynch mob mentality its about pure common sense and a grip on reality. Those who committ crimes against children will never ever change, once they do it once , no amount of rehabilitation will help them.. Now this is certainly going to be seen as inflamatory but why do the psychiatrists etc spend so much time with them? the crime has been committed , lock them up and as you say throw away the key. Paedophiles can be very clever people, of course they know what they are/have done is wrong and of course they can show remorse with the weeping and wailing and the sorry’s but it will never change them……if they are truly sorry then they will be grateful to be away from the temptation of doing it again.

why oh why do criminals have so many chances of rehabilitation and comforts when there poor victims have to fight for every bit of counselling or phsychiatric help often waiting months for an appointment ….???? The men and woman who commit the atrocities are sitting pretty where as the victim lives it and relives it for the rest of their lives…. I have know women in there 70s who still relive abuse……..my point is that we have to do everything to keep these people off our streets and away from our children….. me ? as soft as I am if anyone had touched my girls I would have dealt with it precisely iwth the lynch mob mentality ………. no mercy ……

[cath 55]

@langstraat wrote:

Cath,

I’ll wait and see whether anybody else has problems opening the link before removing it. Sometimes, depending on the browser used you may have to copy and paste instead of clicking. It’s strange that it shows the motor bike on the title heading and not the text,
oh hum.

LMAO lang it helps if you scroll down doesnt it lmao ………dont worry i wont hurt anyone pmsl xxxx

[cath 55]

@bat wrote:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/17112006/344/website-names-missing-paedophiles.html

Do you think it,s good idea to post details like this, or not?

The details that have been published Bat are of already convicted paedophiles, and yes i do think its a good idea, however, and this is the fly in the ointment, I do worry bout look alikes, you will always get someone who thinks the person they just passed in the street/live next door to/works in the local shop etc and these perfectly innocent people wil be targeted ……..hmmmmm I think I just talked myself out of publishing these mens details ……

But anything that can save even one child from the horrors of abuse cant be all bad but for the reason a bove …….

hugs batty xooxxox

[cath 55]

@langstraat wrote:

My dearest Sharon,

Thank you for your kind felicitations I hope you enjoy the story. As is my wont I do sometimes go on and on as is the case here. A statement of fact and in no way an apology.

If you enjoy it and wish to read more I kindly direct you to another I posted for UGO’s attention; I haven’t received any feedback from him and can only think that he may be in custody or under an internet restriction ban after that incident I’ve been forbidden to disclose.
:wink:

http://web.mac.com/langstraat1

i read the above lol xxlook at life langy lol I got lots of em but not ever posted them , now I clicked the link an all i got was a picture of a motorbike so hey ho ….an lang? ur siggy still freaks me out , well the eyes on it anyway lol clever, but freaky xx

[cath 55]

the eyes on ur siggy still freak me out lang and no amount of music will change that xxxx the rose is one of my favs at the mo xxxx

[cath 55]

life !!!!

[cath 55]

I feeling kinda blue today
‘oh not again I hear you say’
but dont get me wrong its just human emotion
and I dont intend to cause a commotion.

I shouldnt really be feeling this way
I do have more than most around today
I have my girls who I adore
I suppose I shouldn’t be sad cos who would want more
I guess i do is the answer
someone fer me to love just him and her
Why is it so hard to find someone true
who takes you as you and doesnt misconstrue
your personanility which just wants to love
thats special someone to have and to hold

[cath 55]

@langstraat wrote:

Me Lurkin!

Madam, you jest I have no need to lurk I stand proud,
well most mornings I do.

langstraat your siggy is freaky!!!! brrrrrrrr xxx

[cath 55]

@pats wrote:

thats the kinda thing that would have me sniggering into my hand caff. bad innit. i remember my daughter havin a nasty habit of walkin backwards talkin to me on the way to school when she was about 8. one mornin she turned around and headbutted a lampost. i couldnt pick her up fa laffin. bad BAD mother. i have a sick sense of humour. :? :D

ok pats cyas on the handcart lmao xxx

[cath 55]

@langstraat wrote:

Madam,

You have the advantage of me, I blush. Unfortunately I am nor conversant with your Jamaican speak lingo. re: “an y not lmao xxx off fer me baff shazza speak soon xxxxx in”

The reference to a forum for Autumn years members I can only guess is ‘Waiting for Godo’ to which I’m not a member of……..yet.

I would surely remember an exchange with such an amorous creature but that is only in my dreams and not reality.

The only Cath I recall had a bad leg and incontinent mongrel.
If this is you then reveal your self………Now; we have unfinished business to consummate, the clocks ticking.

Sharongooner came close with her reference to ‘bubbles’ it has a connection to the alias I used to briefly regain entrance into the banned site; it could be coincidental but……..if she would to elaborate further …………

Your most obediant servant,

~Langstraat~

lol no is not an incontinent mongrel lmao xxx hugster going to bed now lol xxxx

[Author]

Posts