draculina

Rude boy,

I think the jihadis win hands down if we end the freedom to practise religion in this country.

I don’t find islam at all attractive, and I think that freedom to practise this or any other faith has to be subject to sensible law – including laws against hate-crimes such as homophobia and fgm.

Otherwise, Muslims must be free to practise…[Read more]

Drac,

after the Westminster attacks, you ask how many more will need to die before something is done.

Then you say you don’t really know what can be done, and throw in a few comments about punishing Muslim countries and curbing immigration.

That about sums it up. We can all demand action of some sort against countries which tolerate and promote…[Read more]

oh and another thing, when i made a forum topic about suzanne. CHATGUIDE HAD TO DELETE THE BLOODY THING!!!! she came into my topic and told lots of lies. LIES LIES LIES! so cg had to delete them all. just a little fact for the readers. suzannes lies destroyed my topic thread.

oh yes jamie f. i remember i was in f3 and we had great concern over these changes. and nobody bloody cared. i seriously dislike changes and when ever there is changes there is a risk of stop breaking. oh but then i got called paranoid busybodying nutter. well excuse me!!! they wouldnt be moaning if the site did break now would they. no they…[Read more]

well, that’s an interesting point, and one made by Dawkins.

However, Biblical literalism is no longer accepted by most Christian theologians – the liberal Christians of the 19th century are in agreement with all but fundamentalists today that we have to cherrypick the bible.

We’ve been cherrypicking the Bible from before it was written. There…[Read more]

well, that’s an interesting point, and one made by Dawkins.

However, Biblical literalism is no longer accepted by most Christian theologians – the liberal Christians of the 19th century are in agreement with all but fundamentalists today that we have to cherrypick the bible.

We’ve been cherrypicking the Bible from before it was written. There…[Read more]

well, that’s an interesting point, and one made by Dawkins.

However, Biblical literalism is no longer accepted by most Christian theologians – the liberal Christians of the 19th century are in agreement with all but fundamentalists today that we have to cherrypick the bible.

We’ve been cherrypicking the Bible from before it was written. There…[Read more]

Very brave.

And definite proof that you are of a higher life form.

Welcome to the boards

hello

I dress the same way that I did when I was 22.

Boho. Bohemian.

I was once in a discussion group wiht a colour psychologist, who was employed by various firms to help wht design of colurs to suit not jsut age but taste.

He assessed each of us as individuals (it was an informal, friendly grouping), arghing that our fashion was a statement about…[Read more]

all in good time.

So far I’m looking at this from the point of view of modern ‘science’, to show that Dawkins and atheists aren’t as rational as they think he is.

That doesn’t disprove atheism. As drac has pointed out, atheism can’t be disproved.

It doesn’t prove a God; but it doesn’t disprove a God either.

Proof being in terms of scientific…[Read more]

I agree with you totally, drac, but feel that is the starting point, not the endpoint of enquiry.

It was expressed mos clearly by a German philosopher* who set side by side two opposing arguments. The world has a beginning in space and time; the world has no beginning in space and time etc etc. he goes on to demonstrate the truth of all the…[Read more]

It’s relevant to the discussion.

So which God(s) do you believe in ?

no, I’m not.

Is that important?

The big bang theory points to an origin of space and time. It points to an area where there is no time and no space.

This is compatible with Christianity.

It’s also compatible with atheism. Stephen hawking has been going up and down like a yoyo on God, but from what I understand he’s working on string theory to show how the cosmos came into…[Read more]

Try the catholic Concordance. The chronology of Genesis is no longer accepted by the Catholic Church.

They do accept that Genesis is true in a different way – a a metaphor for the creation of sin. That’s why they argue that Adam and Eve is a story whihc expresses a truth. and they us the myth in that way to paint a horrifying picture of Heaven,…[Read more]

I’ll call you Blossom or I get confused.

You should read the title of the thread. Dawkins claims that ‘science’ has  disproved the existence of God, and he uses evolution theory to demonstrate that Christianity is an incoherent and contradictory account of how man (and woman) was created.

I’m trying to call that into question by using modern…[Read more]

define “predator” ?

You’re talking rubbish. Name one woman on here I have hassled ? or behaved untoward with ?

(people that have been offensive / rude / nasty to me first dont count)