Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
The Mikado
@galaxy wrote:
Haha no I’m definitely not pregnant! Well I’m joining the gym with a mate so hopefully that should help and with the weather being nice at the moment I’ve decided to start going on bike rides as well. If that doesn’t work then I’m gonna give up!
If you serioulsy wan to be fit – and keep the weight off – then you should eat the right stuff galaxy – and keep eating it
That means no white bread , ice cream , fried stuff , fat meat , egg yolks etc
@Tory Girl wrote:
:roll: And there was I thinking we were civilised, hey lets sack all the dog wardens and let stray dogs hunt in packs again like they used to and attack anyone and anything they need to so that they don’t go hungry. :D
Now you’re just being a tad too silly TG
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Drivel makes a lot of sense. It’s natural for dogs to hunt in packs, so let’s bring back bull-baiting and bear-baiting. While we’re at it, why don’t we bring back the roman circuses where wild animals were set on people. It was popular entertainment and a fun day out for all the family. Kept a lot of people in jobs too. It’s a lion’s natural instinct to hunt other creatures, so what’s wrong with letting a lion feed on the odd person now and then. It kept the prison population down as well.
It’s good to see you are now on board MR Bigstuff – well done
@Tory Girl wrote:
The difference between a lion chasing its prey and catching it, is that a Lion has to do that to survive. A hunting dog does not have to chase a fox and rip it to pieces in order to survive. The dog is trained, the only animal acting on pure instinct is the Lion. I don’t like the damage foxes do either but in the 21st century you would have thought someone could come up with a far better solution don’t you?!! :wink:
Not at all TG – it’s perfectly natural for dogs to hunt in packs – they ARE acting on instinct . If dogs are let loose they will eventually form packs and hunt – its nature
So whats wrong with old fashined solutions – like hunting
It keeps people employed – keeps the fox population down and gives the country gentlefolk an enjoyable day out
@Tory Girl wrote:
The difference between a lion chasing its prey and catching it, is that a Lion has to do that to survive. A hunting dog does not have to chase a fox and rip it to pieces in order to survive. The dog is trained, the only animal acting on pure instinct is the Lion. I don’t like the damage foxes do either but in the 21st century you would have thought someone could come up with a far better solution don’t you?!! :wink:
Not at all TG – it’s perfectly natural for dogs to hunt in packs – they ARE acting on instinct . If dogs are let loose they will eventually form packs and hunt – its nature
So whats wrong with old fashined solutions – like hunting
It keeps people employed – keeps the fox population down and gives the country gentlefolk an enjoyable day out
Again – another thread taken over by liberal attitudes
Have none of you ever seen big cats stalking and chasing their prey – bringing it down – snapping it’s neck then severing it’s neck
It’s nature it happens
You’re all thinking of a fox as a cuddly little Basil Brush puppet
Foxes cause all sorts of serious damage – look at what’s left of a hen coop after a fox has ravaged it
You might think differently if a fox attacks the family pet
Theres nothing wrong with the hunt – it’s a great tradition – it keeps thousands in employ
As usual it is 95% of “townies” that are against hunting – people who wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between a fox and a red squirrel !!!
What the ferk are “rocks” doing outside a Greggs ??? – is it halfway up a mountain Matt ???
@Magoo wrote:
And your last prediction sums you up, you know nothing about anything… are you trying to outdo Kash?
Just watch the Mackems fly next season mate We have great backing now and Quinny knows exactly what to do
who is your team Magoo ???
pikey wrote::-s Those people didn’t visit a war zone and expect to be rescued, they were there when violence erupted. Of course they deserve to be evacuated by their country if it is possible. Further, if people join the armed forces then they do as they’re told, whether they agree with it or not. That’s the cost of the Queen’s shilling.As for the Israeli action itself, it all seems perfectly predictable to me, if customarily heavy handed. They have been attacked by forces armed by their self-declared enemies and hosted in a neighbouring country which has done little or nothing to curb the presence of an extra-governmental army within their borders, despite Security Council resolutions instructing them otherwise.
Imagine if Ipswich and Norwich were being bombarded by hundreds of rockets from the Dutch coast and the Dutch government simply said there was nothing they could do. Imagine if an army of extremist Dutch* financed and armed by Germany and France had conducted raids on the Essex coast and kidnapped two squaddies from Colchester to God knows what fate. Would you be pleased to see a British government simply sit on its hands? Or would you want to take action against the Dutch extremists, their sponsors and the Dutch government? Such is the plight of Israel.* Unlikely, I know. The Dutch only get extremist when they move to Africa. I think it’s because their spliff supplies get cut off. But it’s an analogy. And unlikely analogies have served their purpose for a long time now.
A worthy comparison Pikey – well done
What these anti Western posters should realise – if they go and live in those countries – they are defending – and speak out against the government as they do the British and American governments here – then they wouldn’t live long
As far as the armed forces go – when you recruit you know the dangers – if you don;t want to risk your life – don’t join up !!!
