Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
22 February, 2007 at 12:27 am #261506
@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:
1/ How would this SPECIFICALLY be encouraged?
2/ Where would you want WASPS to go? (“non-religious” would surely include Protestants).
3/ Where would you “invite” an English homosexual to go?
1. Finance, we waste billions on EU membership. We waste gord knows how many millions on asylum seekers etc. We waste hundreds of thousands on minority projects like black associations, the CRE etc. The war has cost us how many billions ££££££ We waste money hirring non English unemployed. We have created a society that encourages people to go from regular unemployment to sick benefit. Just what have those who voted New Labour done to us…
2. The fanatisism of humans and religious belief is very difficult to stop. You would simply have to refuse religious belief as part of our political society, and people would have to understand that mass religion doesn’t suit society. If it got out of hand like now, then you’d have to abolish it publicly.
3. Evidently, sexual preference is something you cannot stop. It would be something, like religious belief, that wouldn’t be promoted.
This whole thing is not easy, but the current make-up of our society is worse. You will never please everyone all the time, but you can work towards pleasing the majority most of the time. The more diverse we become, the worse it gets.
I think i read in Denmark and Sweeden recently, they’ve stopped immigration to asses where they go from now on? Malmo is Sweeden is a islamic melting pot, the police struggle to cope with muslims. They live in areas where poverty has become riffe, and its not because they want it that way, its because the Sweeds dont mix.
Were constantly funding minority projects in England, because they usually find themselves in the poorest communities without jobs, but were told they are like us living side by side as a lovely multicultural country, its farce spin to blag a vote or 8 million…
22 February, 2007 at 12:08 am #261554@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:
1/ I would defend anyones right to voice their opinions and believe anything they like. I would as a result tell anyone who disagrees with point 1, that it is an individuals right to stand up and voice his/her objections to ANYTHING they are told by “those who run the country”. Anyone disagreeing with that opinion also has the right to voice as such. I am a sincere advocate of freedom of speach including people whose opinions I strongly disagree with.
2/ Personally, i would relish the oppurtunity to see a BNP representative on “Question Time”, because the apparent flaws in the points they raised would be exposed before the nation. To this end, i would actually call for this to happen. This is not the first instance of elected individuals being refused as such. Bobby Sands MP comes to mind, in fact Gerry Adams et al,was, even in news casts, dubbed and even refused entry into parliament, even though fairly elected. This isn’t new Emma and definately isn’t restricted to the BNP. I can assure you though, that Sinn Fein did not receive 670,000 public funding for a party political broadcast.
3/ No, it would be much the same but without cultural diversity, therefore it would, in my humble opinion be worse.
4/ The question can have no answer set in stone, different cases of murder would call for different severity of crime. A father convicted of murdering the rapist of his child should be treated more leniently in my opinion that a man who stabbed a young teenage child at a bus stop for no reason other than he was black. Each case would needed to be judged on its own evidence.
5/ I wouldn’t answer that to you on here out of self-respect. The reason i could not answer question 5 lay totally on your inclusion of the word “luxury”.
6/ I have yet to make up my mind regarding the EU, but on common sense i would of course be in favour of anything not causing a loss, but it isn’t that simple.
7/ I would encourage the training of any unemployed person, but again Emma, you neglect glaringly obvious facts. The foreign alternative is sometimes better than the English equivalent, this of course isn’t always the case, regardless of race, the best person for the job should be hired.
8/ I have seen no one in English politics that would fit that description.
1. Is it fair for those who think yes, to point at those who think no, and say they are racists for not embracing multiculturalism?
2. But, seeing as you’re in favour, should the BBC panel organiser(s) be sacked for not allowing a BNP representative on, especially as the IRA have been on?
3. So you would want an English Parliament, but with a british government?
4. Surely murder is murder? Family of victims dont see the logic of any reason, they usually just want justice, so they welcome “20 years”, regardless of why, and are disgusted if its lower.
If someone was to kill a family member, but had done so because your family member had raped their child, what sentence would you see as right and fitting?5. Do prisoners in your opinion, have it too comfortable?
6. We managed before without any problems, what is the point of belonging to a community that costs us medical help, police on the streets and better schooling etc?
7. You are avoiding the real issue here, and is typical of multiculturalists. Ask the average man on the street, and i’d bet money they’d say train our unemployed if possible. But because this is BNP policy, you will try spinning out of it.
8. Who for you is the best?
21 February, 2007 at 11:39 pm #261553@token_male wrote:
1. yes
2. yes
3. no
4. no
5. yes
6. no
7. no
8. yes1. why?
2. Should those within the BBC who make panel decisions be sacked for not allowing one on?
3. why not?
4. What is?
5. why do you wana fund the luxury of criminals?
6. why is the cost good enough, considering we could spend that money on ourselves, it is ours.
7. why would you rather fund someone on benefit?
8. Any suggestions of who?21 February, 2007 at 11:29 pm #258447@token_male wrote:
But the party is quite clearly for BRITISH nationals?
:D No one in “britain” is English then…
21 February, 2007 at 11:23 pm #261543@token_male wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Thats what we do when we visit a foreign land of culture, embrace it.
what a load of rubbish!!
the engish and british.. are hated abroad!
we are rude intollerant we fight kill and are not a good example when abroadIm disapointed you are rude, intolerant, want to fight and dont show a good example when abroad.
Last time i went abroad, i tasted the local culture. You must be a wrong un :wink:
Im surprised genie with all his cultural loving feels the same way.
21 February, 2007 at 4:49 pm #261504@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:
A new question then.
How do you propose bringing about an end to multiculturalism?You invite those people’s who have become part of the extended 1948 society of England to leave. Regardless of whether they will or not, you concentrate on a prodomanent belief system. English, non religious (if possible) white and hetrosexual.
This will happen in time, but when it does, it will be after a nightmare of innocent deaths forced upon us by the old gang, who only see their own personal comforts in life, and dont give a rats about the minorities the claim to represent, the minorites in our society are the old gangs political wand.
Wouldn’t it be great if atleast 99.9% of us loved mass multiculturalism. Isnt it also great, that we humans have individual thoughts that dont always go along with those who run society.
21 February, 2007 at 4:28 pm #261550@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:
1/ No.
2/ Yes.
3/ Yes. (If you support the Welsh and Scottish assemblies).
4/ No.
5/ This question contains a personal view and as such cannot be answered.
6/ Undecided.
7/ Yes and No, the question contains a “rather than”, which makes it impossible to answer.
8/Yes.The questions i posed were specific, some of these have included personal views and bias.
1. genie, what do you say to those who think yes?
2. I know, that many thousands have asked for a BNP representative. Should those within the BBC who make panel decisions be sacked because for not allowing one on?
3. Do you think English (as in the people that live in England) independency will make England a better place to live? :D
4. What is?
5. Do you have a close friend/family inside?
6. Are you infavour of the EU not costing us a yearly loss atleast?
7. Does it make financial sense to train our unemployed, before seeking a foreign alternative?
8. Any suggestions of who?21 February, 2007 at 4:14 pm #261539@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:
Emma embraces multiculturalism. But would like an end to immigration.
I do not embrace it you idiot. Cant believe you accussed me of lieing but put up a brand new thread to tell lies yourself.
Emma does not think people living in England should have to return to their native land.
Correct. I think they can be encouraged if they so wish. I would never force people to leave. Whilst they dont leave, the make-up of England can be aimed at supporting a white English society.
Emma does think people from any other country should be allowed to visit and live in England temporarily.
Nothing wrong with that, so long as they dont change the English white make-up of our country, and embrace what being white and English means. Thats what we do when we visit a foreign land of culture, embrace it.
Emma, like myself embraces multiculturalism and i applaud her for it.
Previous signs of dillusion stamped by that statement.
21 February, 2007 at 4:04 pm #261502@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:
Thank you Emma, so from this you no longer wish an end to multiculturalism, simply an end to immigration into England from any other country.
Shame you didn’t ask for a when and how to end the multicultural nightmare…im hardly going to say yes, we should kick em out, that would be stupid, so i answer no, which is not a 100% correct answer…
By proxy, All other countries as a result should end English migration into their country, we must be fair after all.
Fine by me, long live Nationalistic paganism.
I could not answer them, because i embrace multiculturalism and welcome it.
Hopefully not, but one day you will suffer it. You may already have, but are scared to say. Cant be fair for your taxes to be spent on non white and gay sex organisations, but not white and straight sex organisations?
21 February, 2007 at 3:15 pm #261500I can only give my personal opinion to the above questions. I and the following answers are NOT representative of any political belief system. Some answers are not 100% yes or no, but i can only answer yes or no :D
1. yes.
2. no.
3. no.
4. no.
5. yes.
6. no.Be interesting to read the BNP’s answers of the above, though i doubt you’d get 6 yes or no answers.
Other posters, try it, its fun. What would your answers be genie?
-
AuthorPosts
