Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@rubyred wrote:
2 scottish lads, viewers (scottish ones in particular) made well aware there Scottish..
erm..yeah they happen to be Scots..it does NOT mean we neccesarilly vote for them !! we Knew they were Scots by the accent alone. gosh only knows why YOU chose to highlight this ems!
Because believe it or not, highlighting it on tv helps to get votes. Might not with you, and alot of folk like you and me, but the more you promote it, the more chance people are encouraged.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
The policemen who beat Rodney King were acquitted too. It doesn’t mean they didn’t commit any crime though. They were caught on tape just like Griffin and Collett. Griffin said that if someone told the police what he had just said he would get 7 years in prison. If that’s not an admission of guilt I don’t know what is.
So now your saying that all those who were acquitted in a court of law are actually guilty, or is it there guilty if you say so?
Do you believe in our court system?
What part of Nick and Mark being made innocent in our court system, dont you understand?
He didnt say that, he said if he said that OUTSIDE YOU THICK TWAT :D
Im bored of you now.
3 years ago, what did “Britain paid 9.97bn euros into the EU budget but received 6.22bn euros in return” mean? What was that money spent on?
How much do we pay on a daily, monthly or yearly basis in the year 2006?
Why dont we spend the money ourselves, havn’t you lefty extremists got any backbone?
@slayer wrote:
This is from someone who tars every labourite, conservative and liberal (the “old” guard) with the same brush- funny how you don’t like the boot when its on the other foot.
When you face it that the BNP is no better than any other political party, you will find enlightenment
Ruck me, theres a world of difference between BNP activists who do and dont owe council tax, and the old gang policies which are pretty much the same, come on.
I really beg to differ on your 2nd point slayer, ive read a reasonable amount of the BNP manifesto, seen for my own eyes in the flesh how BNP activists opperate, and what comes out of the gobs of the old gang holes, and i can honestly say theres a major difference.
Now, its been posed to me recently, that they wouldn’t implement their policy, but what we have now is a complete and utter nightmare. The least we could do, would be to enlist a completely different bunch of hardy souls (BNP, respect, ukip etc) to see if the future can be better.
If we get 4, 5, or 6 parties with reasonable power, THAT would be a revolution in comparison to what we have now.
Without going into a whole range of social nightmares, take the story of the drug prisoners who got £750,000 compensation, you cant tell me this is the result of hard working people in government who care about us.
We need a change, hell even you in power, ANYONE but the stalemate we have now.
@slayer wrote:
Even when we agree, we can’t agree can we! :lol:
the EU is not an organisation which I support however I recognise the economic benefit of being in a single market. We should remain in the EU but by stick to its original principles of a common market place NOT some bureaucratic nightmare which impacts on our daily life
The common market YES, the E frigging U, no frigging way, its just a bureacratic organisation for lazy men in suits with five star access to transport and hotel accomodation, and of course to change my England into a european state, fook THAT!!!
@forumhostpb wrote:
I can’t be arsed to look it all up again –
Are you by any chance suggesting that the whole thing is false and that these two didn’t do it ??? Surely not Emma – somebody so dedicated to the truth and free speech as yourself wouldn’t go into denial over all this would they??
You want me to take part in a debate created by you, a supposedly anti-BNP activist, who provides a story with abuse and no credible link.
I dont doubt much of the story, but taking your every word with abuse….all i have to go on is what you say, your just not completely trust worthy.
If whoever has done wrong, then it is wrong, but your headline is wrong…is the whole of the respect party, people who wear cat suits and pretend to be cats :D
JustChat make up abusive stories without foundation :wink:
2 things PB.
1. Say sorry for the anti-BNP slagging in this thread and mean it.
2. Provide a credible link.Slayer, if we pull out of the eu, people in the eu will trade with us if we make a good enough product.
To think that we have to pay to be part of a bigger community of countries and not be capable of holding our own is pathetic and lazy.
This poxy government are useless at training the unemployed here, which is now 1.7 million, 2.7 million on sick benefit, pretty much 3 million unemployed, the only thing thats kept new labour going is the natural progression of the telecommunications network, which they have naff all to do with. They are taxing us to the hilt (leaving your bin out longer than a day, pathetic) because they are useless without backbone.
Hospitals wards are CLOSING by an alarming rate, money is starting to get very tight, they have to fight illegal wars for money with innocent people who are under protected, and its only when new labour’s education (tax) headline collapsies that people will finally realise what a sincere cok-up they voted for, by then it will be a nightmare which will take ten years to get back.
mr bigastuff, no link, and to think the bbc are more trustworthy of the facts about the eu, than a political party thats got 12? mep’s, well, just shows your arogance.
Ask all the editors of all the national media, and i’ll bet more trust talksport than the Biased Bollax Company.@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Griffin and Collett were guilty as sin, caught on tape
You obviously do not agree with the law then. Do you prefer lawlessness and/or dictatorism?
Griffin admitted that he had commited a crime.
Mr troll, he didnt, he said he would be commiting a crime had he said what he said outside…
They were deliberately scare-mongering and inciting hatred.
No mate, your wrong again. They were found innocent. Is the white padded walls affecting your reading skills?
Either the jury decided it was a case of inciting hatred towards a religious group rather than racial hatred or they mistakenly thought it was a case of free speech.
The former more likely. Isnt this statement rather contradictory of the above statements you make, you are worrying me somewhat, you’d better let us know your doctors numbers so we can ring them all for you.
You can see from the extracts I posted that this wasn’t a theological discussion, this was incitement against muslims and asians.
Wow you are deluded, they were proved innocent.
