Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@emmalush wrote:
ooh get Dawny :)
I cant afford itv2 at £27.70ph :wink:
What a great show. Gordon gets so upset, how the contestants manage i dont know. They must be half the weight by now.
I have a feeling the girl who joined the boys will win. Gordon must think highly of her the most, for putting her amongst those awfull men, and they won with her.
Me thinks Gordon is trying to show the Americans that there not the greatest at everything like they seem to think.
What a great way to let off steam (no pun intented) and frustration :)
Heather won. I know a winner when i see one :D
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
there has never been absolute freedom of speech, there have always been things that lawmakers have banned people from saying. You can’t mischievously shout “fire” in a crowded theatre
Why not, if you’ve ever done any kind of safety training, they’ll tell you that saying something like that doesn’t panick people at all. Infact, people are more likely to wait until they can see the fire before moving, unless a official that they can see says move.
If some demagogue goes around saying that muslims will harm your kids and take your women by force then those people who believe what that person is saying will be more inclined to attack, abuse, or discriminate against muslims.
No one said that, Nick explained how certain muslim fanatics have already done so, and that if people didnt back the BNP, it would carry on, as it has done.
Fortunately, the government doesn’t plan to sit on its laurels and is proposing a toughening up of race-hate legislation so that extremists can’t get off on technicalities. They will probably run into difficulties again with people who naively think it’s an issue of free speech.
Asking folk to do wrong, is wrong, but telling people the truth is good, and if you think by stiffling that is a good thing, you are a idiot.
Can you explain to us all what constitutes incitement to racial hatred?
For instance, could a football fan say to an audience of people, that nottingham forest fans are bad?
That sort of thing happens at just about every football ground by people, yet no one would ever think of curtailing it.
@slayer wrote:
hypocrisy
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, gosh how many times do i have to explain it, its V O L U N T A R Y, YOUR CHOICE, UPTO YOU, IN YOUR OWN HANDS, FOR YOU TO DECIDE, do you understand now?
Gosh you are thick.
Emma – is it English or British?
Whichever you prefer.
Southern Irish stay? Whys that then?
Probably because there very similar people who also share very similar troubles socialy and politicly as we do.
What have they got that the Danes havent?
The danes are similar to us too, but you have to draw the line somewhere.
The Jews are out too I take it as they are not “christian”.
Again, you have to draw a line somewhere, multiculturalism doesn’t work for everyone. We need a society that helps everyone enjoy a better life. Im not christian, i hate christianity, but its the prodomanent religon that this country is based on.
A secular country is what we should aim for, but in order to acheive that, you have to limit religious beliefs first, a gradual process.It is so easy to say “voluntary repatriation” but when you try and get any sense under the shallowness, there is none at all cos there is no policy- just a clever propaganda machine
You saying the BNP are clever, tut tut :D
We all understand what the BNP are about
That sounds like a desperate plea to me.
The thing is slayer mate, just because we have a society which the old gang have inflicted upon us and you have taken on board, doesn’t mean its any good. I want whats best for you, and if we, me and you cannot get along with it, then between us we must help eachother make society better for us all. You cant just say we have this, and you have to lump it if that is not what some folk want.
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
I live on a council estate in Reading. ALL of the problems we have here are caused by young WHITE BRITISH males!
You’re quite happy to live on an estate with white british people though :wink:
My family was also in WW2, and i can tell you, they fought to defend the society we had at the time, they fought to defend the british, not this multiracial sesspit.
The BNP want to defend what they fought for.
Talksport is not a phone-in show, its a combination of many, with expertease (which includes the far left) invited to give there political and social opinions. So you rather wrongly jumped the gun of assumption, like you do regular with me.
You and others like your attitude, confirms to me that this countries population needs segregating. You and i just dont agree, hardly ever will about most things.
If we could divide britain up into 2 sections, one for white hetrosexual English/british right wing secular/christian people, and anything else on the other, which would you choose?
@jelly tot wrote:
Emma, firstly thanks for the honesty in letting me know that I’ll be told to sod off from my own country ( did I read that right?).
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, gosh how many times do i have to explain it, its V O L U N T A R Y, YOUR CHOICE, UPTO YOU, IN YOUR OWN HANDS, FOR YOU TO DECIDE, do you understand now?
If you (not anyone else) decide you’d prefer to leave, then you will be helped financially. It is only the wish of the BNP that non whites, non English/british people be helped financially to leave, IF THEY SO WISH TO OF THEIR OWN ACCORD.It is easier for the prodomanent peoples of this land to live together in harmony.
Your missing my point slightly, whilst I agree with you on the legally binding manifesto is it a workable option? I don’t think so in todays fast changing world.
Thats the problem. So, if its not workable, then we just have to live with how we do things.
What I’m trying to get to is that all politicians are corrupt, they may start off with good intentions but soon the true value of power sinks in and that’s that.
Well the question you have to ask to that is, which ones are less corrupt, and which ones have the better policies for you.
@chathostuk wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
The decent law abiding tax payers of this country pay to the eu £39,000,000M every single day of the year,
So the UK pays £14,235,000,000 to the EU each year? (£39,000,000 x 365)
Well I must say you certainly have enlightened me, emma.
The leader of ukip, nigel farage said £15,000,000,000 about 2 weeks ago on talksports james whale radio show. He painted a very bleak picture of how its spent too. What stuck in me head above all, was that each country sends a commissioner (we sent mandelson) (i think neil kinnock is there too), and they decide what laws should be voted on, then each mep votes on them to see if its made law.
The farcical situation is, that non elected commissioners decide what laws can be put forward, regardless of who we voted to decide for us prodomanently.
The whole eu nonsense is a complete farce. Why we cant spend £39,000,000+ every day ourselves is beyond me.
@jelly tot wrote:
Would I and my family be asked to leave?
I think that people who are not white and/or british would be invited, but dont quote me on that. I think the Sothern irish would be welcome to stay and not be invited to leave.
Is that ok for you?You see the problem is this, nobody believes all the smiles and suits, we know the bomber jackets and D.M.s are waiting in the wings, given half a chance the old NF diehards will come spilling out like a bad smell with their violence and intimidation and then people like me who are hard working tax paying decent citizens will be fire bombed and abused until we have no choice but to go.
Ok, i see your beef. Thats why i suggested we had a legal and binding manifesto where and when possible.
The point is this, that if you are the leader of a country, you can either be a dictator style/communistic society, in which progression is poor, or you can thrive for the benefit of the people. I wont be working for the BNP, i know what some of them are like, and i can genuinely and honestly tell you, that i have never in all my life, seen a more hard working bunch of people.I went leafletting with some of them a few years back. I walked the streets with a 50 odd year old man on a sunday morning, he was supposed to call round at 10am, he got to my house at 9.30 such was the eagerness, he had just been swimming, and he made me look slow walking round the streets. He has his own business (stacks of leaflets in his car scattered around), a wife and kids, is this a thug in a suit?
In contrast, blair wears a suit, and sends our good brave men and women to fight an unjust war for money, who end up murdering innocent iraqis and afghanistans, who risk their very lives, of which more than 100 have now died, is blair a thug in a suit?
BRING OUR TROOPS HOME.So in essence Emma all I’m trying to get across to you is why do you keep banging on about the NF’s pie in the sky manifesto and admit it, compared to Blair and the other idiot politicians, you lot really are the short straw.
Mark Collet has never seen the nf. All you know is the political masters of the old gang party, you havn’t ventured out of the political landscape until now, and your still afraid to tip toe into a brave new world.
If not the BNP, go look at respect, ukip, the greens someone new, find out that there are others out there than the old hacks of lab-lib-con.If/when you do, come back and tell me what you thought of the difference?
Sickening filthy disgusting pervert.
