Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
“Great way to buy a vote” you say. Are the actors standing for election then?
More than 600 every 4 years :wink:
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
There are enough facts and figures there to confirm that this country’s never had it so good.
Who should we thank for that?
I agree america is heading for an authoritarian existence, as is England, thats why we had 9/11 and 7/7.
“for hundreds of years the overriding principle of our legal system has been that judges are independent of government. That means they make their decisions without interference from the government or the executive. Judges also do not get involved with politics and take an oath to uphold the law without fear or ill-favour.”
Who creates the law?
Who decides which person becomes a judge?@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
This country has NEVER been in such good shape for such a long period of time!
Why?
How many jobs have been created through Telecommunications over the last 10 years? Mobile phones, satelite tv and internet, must be millions of jobs created, but nothing to do with new labour.
There are 1.7 million unemployed now. I’d like to know how many people were on the sick in 97, and now? is there still 3 million unemployed? I cant find the figure hmm.
@forumhostpb wrote:
Blimey Emma !!! Allah was a paedophile eh? You sure know how to live dangerously.
Psssst – want to buy some great life insurance ???
But mr butcher, i didnt say allah was a peadophile, i only asked, please spare me?
Es, i wouldn’t ask a baby muslim, let alone a male muslim with muscles and machette :shock:
@forumhostpb wrote:
But Emma – David ”blind pugh” Blunkett has flatly denied ever saying this to the prison governor …. and we all believe every word he says dont we? I said …. DON’T WE ???????
Well there are people surrounded by white padded walls that adore his every word, its like the blind leading the blind 8)
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Surely freedom of speech means freedom to protest too. Personally, I think a person’s freedom of speech should have self-imposed limits for the greater good of the society as a whole.
If you dont intentionally mean to insult someone, is that acceptable free speech? meaning for example, there is a belief that Allah was a peadophile by having sex with a nine year old girl. Now if im not sure, i might ask a die hard muslim if its true, he/she might get really offended. I could also claim it as my belief, that would also make him/her angry, but they cannot ignore me.
So i can never question through free speech allah’s peadophile possibility without fearing a cut neck, sad.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/yaafm12.php Freedom of speech or a complete insult?
@forumhostpb wrote:
Well there is the awful thought that this apparently adopted baby is some sort of fashion accessory. If so, I wonder what will happen when the fashion changes. Will she fly it back to the orphanage in her private jet???
How dare you be as cynical as me :wink:
This is my point too. It just seems like if your rich and famous, it makes you look good to adopt a extremely poor child from a poor african country, not one a few miles down the road.
Pats, at some point your going to say which one you want, so not the others, its as awful as that. To fly accross the world with a camera crewe and all the hassel that goes with it, just to go through that process is quite bizare.
Well said Es.
@pats wrote:
she’s done a pretty good job so far of keeping her own son and daughter out of the eye of the media. fair play to her!.
Thats an interesting thought.
Here we have a multi rich celebrity, who’s kept her two children from the evil clutches of the free press, and then takes a camera crewe to a foreign land where its PC to “adopt” the rights to look after someone elses baby, the baby is then flashed by photographers and hurried into backs of cars and wisked away in a mad hurry.
Ive never seen one tinsy winsy snippet of madona’s two children, but less than a week after enquiring about this baby, i see it online.
I feel the baby is being used.
