Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Im so turned on, maybe you could express what you wear and dont wear in bed, PM me? (all the blokes are, shall we say, moving just now…)
@Bad Manners wrote:
It’s gonna be a long, long time before any War on Terrorism is won.
A short news piece appeared on the BBC website http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4778575.stm yesterday afternoon in which a mention is made of the Police tipping off the Muslim community:
“Police had spoken to a good number of community leaders to make them aware that a major operation was under way.”
This is an incredible statement for the police to make and shows how the Police place a greater emphasis on ensuring smooth relations with the Muslim community than relations with the non-Muslim majority.
Here we have British police, no doubt at a senior level talking to representatives of the very community from which these terror suspects emerge WHILE the operation is still under way.
This must raise a question over the loyalties and professional sensibilities of the senior security officials to their own staff and to the general travelling public. Every beat office, every investigator and every security agent places his or her own life firmly on the firing line whenever they go on duty. The twenty one terror suspects arrested were, according to police reports just a small element of a much larger group. How many individuals within the Muslim community have been alerted by their community representatives that a Police was underway and have now taken steps to avoid their apprehension? At any time were any police and other security officers placed at risk because of this blatant disclosure of information to smooth relations with the Muslim community?
Further it is important to note that there was no parallel “tipping off “ of the non-Muslim majority. Police could have alerted radio and tv stations in the early hours that British airports and international flights were the suspected targets of the religious fanatics and that those with travel plans on Thursday should stay away, partly to avoid the inconvenience and delay but more importantly to stay away from buildings and the infrastructure which may have been a target of the crazed bomb plotters. Muslim community leaders would undoubtedly have passed on the Police information to their family and friends. How many potential Muslim travelers were alerted by their community leaders and avoided the disruption and inconvenience of delayed and cancelled flights?
Why is there one set of rules for Police dealings with the Muslim community and another set for Police dealings with the non-Muslim majority?
Is it a case that the Police are happy to continue playing the role of “dhimmis” and act only with the cognisance and approval of Muslim community leaders?
Note: dhimmi – a non-believer (i.e. non Muslim) who is given permission to live and work under Muslim rule.
Is this fair comment?
@Lambrini Girl wrote:
There you go again … Evading questions!
I am sorry, but yours are not worth answering as they are self evident throughout your posts. I am asking you to explain a statement you made about a social issue … You are asking me to justify what I said about YOU.
Im sorry, there seems to be a technical fault. Please type your answer, and try again, if this error persists, dial 999
Yol have a nice day now :D
@sharongooner wrote:
id rather be comfortable and know the government in power has the resources to always cope with it. even if they dont live here, we will always be a target and security has to be resourceful
Always? What about 7/7, they couldn’t cope, more than 50 people died, hundreds injured.
If we didnt attack british muslim brothers abroad, they wouldn’t attack us. The BNp dont want this war, bring our troops home, NOW!!
just wondered thats all, what the bnp had in plan for when they are in power with regards resources for the security services
Even the most dangerous of evil would think very carefully if the BNP controlled our borders. As it is, most people coming here dont even get asked for there passport, never mind whats in their suitcases.
you have to know the WHOLE picture, not just bits
Absolutely, well said. And only then can we know what is the right thing to do. Its about educating ourselves. Finding out what goes on behind the tv screen, what your local council get upto (which the BNP has made somewhat of a priority, to expose the lib-lab-con nonsense of meetings to work out when council meetings should take place, farcical). Which commercial companies support certain political parties, and why, and how does it affect our daily lives.
Are you prepared to WANT to know?
All important. Some things you know, some you dont, thats life. I then atleast gave you my honest opinion of what i expect is the case.
What would you rather have, mass immigration whereby being human, we dont always get along and terror occurs, or limited immigration which reduces it?
@sharongooner wrote:
police have contacts in all communities… underground, gangs, muslims extremist etc…
better to have contact than no contact
where is the problem?Yes better to have contacts. No contacts with non muslims meant chaos at airports.
as it appears our authorities did a fantastic job today.
It appears we only have their side of the story, and we know from history that they are not very trustworthy with terror opinions.
if BNP had been in power would the budget have been the same after paying to ship everbody out… would we have had the resources we had today?
We’d have a wealth of budget by not wasting taxes on asylum seekers, letting jobs go abroad, importing job seekers from abroad, fighting illegal wars etc etc
what is the BNPs proposal’s to the current budget…. how much of a percentage of the publics money would they give to our security services?
I dont know the ins n outs :D ask them. I would say a fair amount to defend our borders. I dont suppose islamic idiots would wana live under a BNP government.
You have a choice, you can either have mass immigration which will produce factions of hatred (muslims at the moment, could be christians in 20 years time) who will kill, or you can have limited immigration like 30 years ago, when no islamic terror occured.
Who goes, you decide :wink:
@sharongooner wrote:
the nearest i get is when im falling asleep it all comes together then and by morning its all gone doh!!) :wink:
Surely your not thinking of me in bed, how sexy hmm
@Lambrini Girl wrote:
Emma …. Answering for the sake of answering does not consolidate or validate your arguments. You have your opinions, I have mine. To continuously dig your heels in and repeat the same thing over and over again does not a discussion or a debate make.
Please help me find where ive just repeated myself for the sake of it, so that i can put it right?
Look at your last post. You have yet again failed to present anything new towards a sensible debate. All you have done is say “no I didn’t” and “he started it”.
Why are you lieing? I never said those things you quote…
You are very fond of quoting people and very fond of asking questions, although I very much doubt you take the trouble to read the answers. So let me, if I may, reverse the trend and quote you …
Hold on, you havn’t answered mine yet…
Ive heard of an Englishwoman being cleansed in scotland. No doubt some non white or non english have had it happen. Multiculturalism does not work.
Would you care to elaborate on that? I am absolutely baffled as to what you meant. Cleansed??? As in …. a public bathing as opposed to a stoning???
I can answer that NO problem. Would you care to answer my previous questions first though. makes for a more balanced and fair debate.
And when you said multiculturalism in that particular example, surely you didn’t actually mean English versus Scottish????
Well they are two different cultures and races of people, so yes, they make up multiculturalism, and there is racial disharmony between the two, thankfully not massive, but our history (battle of bannock) shows theres been a “versus” for a long time.
A short news piece appeared on the BBC website http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4778575.stm this afternoon in which a mention is made of the Police tipping off the Muslim community:
“Police had spoken to a good number of community leaders to make them aware that a major operation was under way.”
This is an incredible statement for the police to make and shows how the Police place a greater emphasis on ensuring smooth relations with the Muslim community than relations with the non-Muslim majority.
Here we have British police, no doubt at a senior level talking to representatives of the very community from which these terror suspects emerge WHILE the operation is still under way.
This must raise a question over the loyalties and professional sensibilities of the senior security officials to their own staff and to the general travelling public. Every beat office, every investigator and every security agent places his or her own life firmly on the firing line whenever they go on duty. The twenty one terror suspects arrested were, according to police reports just a small element of a much larger group. How many individuals within the Muslim community have been alerted by their community representatives that a Police was underway and have now taken steps to avoid their apprehension? At any time were any police and other security officers placed at risk because of this blatant disclosure of information to smooth relations with the Muslim community?
Further it is important to note that there was no parallel “tipping off “ of the non-Muslim majority. Police could have alerted radio and tv stations in the early hours that British airports and international flights were the suspected targets of the religious fanatics and that those with travel plans on Thursday should stay away, partly to avoid the inconvenience and delay but more importantly to stay away from buildings and the infrastructure which may have been a target of the crazed bomb plotters. Muslim community leaders would undoubtedly have passed on the Police information to their family and friends. How many potential Muslim travelers were alerted by their community leaders and avoided the disruption and inconvenience of delayed and cancelled flights?
Why is there one set of rules for Police dealings with the Muslim community and another set for Police dealings with the non-Muslim majority?
Is it a case that the Police are happy to continue playing the role of “dhimmis” and act only with the cognisance and approval of Muslim community leaders?
Note: dhimmi – a non-believer (i.e. non Muslim) who is given permission to live and work under Muslim rule.
Is this fair comment?
Lambrini Girl wrote:Actually, I do … That would explain a lot of things. But to call it ethnic cleansing explains a lot of other things too.
Your killing suspense :wink:That reply made no sense Emma… We all know Mr B is right … You have shown very little compassion towards anybody who did not conform to your “British/English” criteria.
Then explain the lack of compassion?Wrong again Emma. Mr B is not preaching hatred.
Your attitude on these boards towards non british/non caucasians is no better than the attitude your family encountered.
You are very fond of calling people who do not agree with you “fascists”.
As I have said before, the moment you get abusive towards anybody who does not see your point of view is the moment you have lost the argument.
He’s preaching hatred towards me, by wrongly assuming im bad.
My attitude is to make non white/british live a better life. A life that wont end up fighting the white/british one day.
Im fond of describing fascism when thats what it is.
Does the same abusive logic work for others like you and mr b? Or is it a one-way street…Pot, kettle, black??
Depends if you class me as extremist, we all are to someone or other. Your an extremist to me.
