Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@Lambrini Girl wrote:
Oh ffs … Can you hear yourself?
They ran for the same reason you or I would … They were facing a gang of thugs!!!
In the documentary, the five ran first…
“They faught back and assaulted the five in question”??????
I didnt say that. You are starting to really pi$$ me off with this misquoting malarky, stop it you stupid girl.
FFS Emma :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
@tommy ToXen wrote:
I LIVE IN GREAT BRITAIN. ONE CURRENCY, ONE FLAG.GREAT BRITAIN, HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II, THE GBP, THE BRITISH UNION FLAG
Could i spend a scottish tenner in your local shop :wink:
cant see the royals claiming benefit for much longer.
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
:roll:
Late on 22 April an 18-year-old A-level student called Stephen Lawrence and his friend Duwayne Brooks were making their way home after spending the day together.
The boys were rushing to catch a bus in the south-east London suburb of Eltham – Stephen was already late – when they were confronted by a gang of white youths.
The gang set upon Stephen. A stunned and helpless Duwayne briefly watched in paralysed silence, before he was chased off by one of the white youths.
Driven by fear and adrenaline, Stephen, managed to scramble free as Duwayne urged him to “just run”. But he had been beaten badly and was bleeding profusely.
He collapsed after 200 yards in a pool of blood and died.
Full story here.
Nothing written above proves racism.
What the link says:
“The UK Government unveiled a string of initiatives after the Macpherson inquiry severely criticised the police for its handling of the Stephen Lawrence murder investigation.”No racism.
What the BBc said:
“BBC News Online examines the report, reaction and the background to the racist killing.”The same link “the ugly facts” link:
“…Stephen Lawrence was murdered in 1993. While most racial incidents don’t end in murder…”“The statistics can be spun to suit either case but both sides agree there are far more racial attacks and harassment than the figures record. A momentum is building to wipe out this sort of behaviour altogether.
The Stephen Lawrence case has been a catalyst for change.
Who are the bbc to assume it was a racist murder? They have a duty to all colours of people, who pay their wages, to report WHAT THEY KNOW, and nothing more.
Should the bbc be done for incitement to racial hatred? YES!!
Ive read a mamouth amount of suggestive lies from the bbc and media in general, this is nothing new to me, but if you wana live in a society that seems to accept this, then a future incited country will grow around you.
@tommy ToXen wrote:
I have to say, on this issue, that I agree with Emma 100%
OK yes murder is very wrong. But why should Stephen Lawrence get all this (probably unwanted) publicity and have the politically correct communists in government label it a racist crime etc etc
Shouldn’t all murder, regardless of colour be treat the same?!
Was it proven that the murder was racially motivated? Did they actually confess it in the courtroom? The Jury, Solicitors & The Judge wasn’t there when he was killed, how do they know Stephen wasn’t gobbing off or acting like a chav pretending to be like one of his gangster rap artists
Why did stephen and his mate run away when the incident took place?
Was it because they faught back and assult the five in question?
If so, was it self defence or did they attack first?
They ran 100 yards, does that mean they were partly at fault for his death?
@Lambrini Girl wrote:
That you are a blinkered individual, who can’t be bothered to read anybody else’s opinion .. who.. when you do … selects (god knows what actually) and manages to turn it into (god knows what again) but it strangely always happens to fit your agenda.
Contradiction is your strong point :wink:
As you did ask … There is more! You find it impossible to sustain a sensible argument, as you are hell bent on converting, not listening. Therefore, when things do not go according to plan, you resort to aggressive defensive tactics, which in themselves are usually completely devoid of any substance.
I must say, you are brilliant at contradiction 10/10.
Case in point, your continuous assumption that nobody has yet been able to demonstrate the racial tendencies of the BNP … They have… many times … You just ignored them.
:roll: SHOW ME THEIR RACIST?
I respect poster Magoo, he has good things to say. I asked him twice to prove that the BNP are racist, no reply.That you hold the views that you do is your cross
You know what cross is then :wink:
To waffle on endlessly about how great the BNP is, and how shyte all others are only serves to question your sanity … not ours.
Your waffling…if im wrong, PROVE ME IM WRONG, INSTEAD OF THIS FASCIST BEHAVIOUR TOWARDS ME.
You may have some good points though, as I have said before. But they do get lost in the amount of shyte you coat them in.
Make up your mind, can you do that…
As you did ask … May I also recommend you broaden your horizons? England might be an island …. but it isn’t the only one.
Arnt i allowed to be proud of my country? Have you taken on a dictatorship thought process now?
England is the greatest country, and it can be great again.
@Lambrini Girl wrote:
To cite Talksport as a genuine source of information regarding the Stephen Lawrence’s case
:D I didnt do that. Can you remember what you asked me…
@slayer wrote:
That you believe more what is said by the BNP and a radio phone in show demonstrates that your lack of external vision and inability to recognise neutral and unbaised information affects your ability to make rational thought.
The way your fascist brain kicks into gear is frieghtningly accurate.
What does “you believe more what is said by the BNP and a radio phone in show” mean? I never said it, so why would you. Did you read what i said?
Now tell us what part of the media etc you believe in? Lets see if you contradict yourself :wink:
@Lambrini Girl wrote:
No Emma..
Then what the hell are you saying?
@Lambrini Girl wrote:
I do wish you would be a little less aggressive in putting your point across Emma.
You know, i was thinking the same about you, why are you so aggressive?
I am neither deaf nor stupid. I deliberately made a point of overusing terms like “possible”, “potentially” in my last post, in order to avoid your typical style of reply. It seems that my efforts were wasted on you.
Just chit chat then. Is that wise in a serious thread?
Out of curiosity though, do enlighten us poor misguided fools as to what you regard as an unbiased source of information?
Are you sure it wont be wasted on you?
If the BBC cannot be trusted to deliver accurate news, I would be interested to know who you regard as trustworthy.
I dont think anyone or anything is 100% trustworthy.
I trust some of the general media.
I believe more of what TalkSport provide, mainly the presenters phone-ins, including george galloway, but he is the least.
I believe atleast half of what the BNP say.Just to clarify, your now saying your not sure if the murder of stephen lawrence was racially motivated? And the five men connected are innocent until proven guilty?
@Mrs Clean wrote:
I don’t find Richard at all vile, I really like him, hes a great leader and has given some good advice to people, ok he might have a game plan, but good luck to him.
Isnt his game plan vile though? He makes fun out of everyone he doesnt like, and he doesnt make friends well. He laughs at them, calls the girls plastics, hes very ignorant.
You can tell how popular someone is in there by how many nominations they recieve, he’s been nominated for eviction five times.
People in there dont like him.
Im wondering if richards behaviour is due to his mum being ill. In the 11 weeks he’s been in there, ive never seen him upset, when he was, he was uncontainable.
