Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@becky wrote:
I dont like people speaking in another language purely as it unsettles me not knowing what is being said when the people are looking at you. This being any language non specific. But the thing is my husband had quite a few indian friends and i was 19 when i met him so i thought it was cool to learn rude words in indian :lol: so when i now listen to indians talking i can sometimes make out roughly what they are saying only IF a rude word pops up.
To think the English cant even “advertise” England without a liecence, and are told that waving our flag is wrong, but you can talk about someone in a foreign language, and its called multiculturalism.
To those who say this, dadymanigan, or however you say it.
“pikey wrote:Im pikey, im stupid :D:wink:
@ugo wrote:
On a Train yesterday for an hour & a half , behind me where three asians shouting or talking extreamily loud in there language , annoying most of the passengers as every now & again the word F * * K would come out in plain English , anyway after at least 20 mins of putting up with this shyte I rose to my feet , calmly walked over to them & said ” Either talk quieter or talk in F`in English ok boys or else , anyway when i arrived at my destination I was met by three police officers who kindly drove me to the police station where i recieved a caution .I was informed that a white person was the one who grassed over me to the conducter W@/nker !!!
Now where`s the justice ??? I ask you !!!
Its a game now ugo. The best way to make yourself heard, is to get as close to those ignorances as you can (hold your breath), and talk/shout louder.
You cant expect the marxist run police service to understand the English way of life, doesnt happen 2006.
Dont worry though, the English are bubbling up, we are WAKING UP, we are getting ready to take our country back from the marxist anti-English sesspit multiculturalists.
(”Cesspit” please Emma dear – Ed)
@cath 55 wrote:
the thing is bout dianna is that she really did love charles as far as i know early footage of her clearly showed that she loved him……..
TRUE. Diana loved charles, more than he loved her.
praps someone should be knockin his blatently obvious affairs first b4 dianna’s
Charles started the affair merry-go-round.
dianna woz chosen to bear children and possible heirs to the throne……..she woz in my opinion badly treated……..
Encouraged to have sex with charles, YUK!
I think donkeys years ago, a woman wouldnt mind being used as a princess to bear babies, and they probably didnt work it out until late, and then couldnt do owt about it/not worth it.With diana, it was a whole new ball game, she knew how to manipulate the media for revenge against the royals, and you know how the media like to assist.
and as far as a legacy goes we are on bout her sons………yeah yeah someone is bout to go on bout how harry is a no good beer swillin wot ever…….u know wot its good to see a young man royal family or not have some fun
Charles, the father of harry? He certainly has his mothers fun outlook on life, but charles?
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
Actually i’m as pure as the driven slush – but that’s another story.
Fact is that I am not a member of the Royal family, I’m not an internation public figure, and most important of all…………….. i only played Rugby, I didn’t shag half the England team.
So you are allowed to hide beind your anonymity. Good for you! I don’t think Dianna ever asked to have her every move scrutinised by the whole world. :? So she liked to French Connection UK? So what?
I would have. :PYour right she didnt. She did want some of her moves scrutinised, but thats where she went wrong, she didnt realise that its a two way thing.
Then she would moan about the media, the very people that gave her a much needed voice after the royals dist her.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
In places where there have been droughts or famines, the problem is not large families the problem is that the governments don’t have the infrastructure or resources to deal with food shortages.
Governments are a problem, but many mouths keep the starving starved.
You can’t solve that problem with condoms and aid deliveries are only a short-term solution too.
Whilst we live in paradise, it is a must to help in any way.
The long-term solution is to create an environment in which countries will be able to prosper and then they will be able to solve all their internal problems. Africa is rich in natural resources and given time and the right economic and political conditions, Africa will inevitably become a wealthy continent.
Sometimes i wonder if its better for the globalised world to keep poor people poor.
@kevin wrote:
i know shes dead
and the daily express have’nt gone a week without having a so called exclusive on the event
how her sons must enjoy the constant reminder their much loved mother is still dead
emma f’u’ck offjeez your a delightfull one
I doubt the prince’s will ever read this, so dont worry about it.
It wouldnt surprise me if she was murdered.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=391065&in_page_id=1770
Astonishing claims by new witnesses are being examined by British detectives investigating Diana’s death. They seem incredible. But if true, they could rock the Royal Family to its foundations.
On the night that Diana, Princess of Wales died, the lights of the British Embassy — less than a mile from the accident spot in Paris — blazed until dawn finally broke over the French capital.
Inside the imposing building, diplomats summoned from their sleep by the British ambassador, Sir Michael Jay, struggled to monitor the tragedy that was unfolding.
the Mail can reveal today that new eye-witnesses have emerged in the past few weeks with explosive testimony which raises profound questions about the influence of the House of Windsor and the Establishment over events surrounding the Princess’s death.
These fresh accounts include the astonishing claim that the Queen’s most senior and trusted courtier was seen in Paris, at the British Embassy, half an hour before the crash.
Furthermore, they include a baffling allegation that the RAF crew which flew Tony Blair from his Sedgefield constituency to London to greet the Princess’s repatriated body had been on continual standby to make the flight from two days earlier — when Diana was still alive.
During this investigation, the Mail has also received confirmation that two diplomats working for the secret intelligence service MI6 were operating at the British Embassy in Paris during the weeks before Diana’s death.
These two senior men — who have both enjoyed glittering careers — have admitted their intelligence roles to Lord Stevens, the ex-head of Scotland Yard who is heading the official inquiry into whether there was any conspiracy to murder the Princess.
@Lambrini Girl wrote:
I was about to say I am sure your sentiments are very noble Emma, but that you could have put them in a less condescending way. I have changed my mind.
“These poor people” do not need people like you to “educate them into not having babies so much”. How dare you, clad into all the trappings of your comfortable western world, profess to know what is right for “destitute africans”!!!
If I were one of those “destitutes”, and you offered me a fiver, I would throw it back at you with the contempt it deserved. Charity and compassion is one thing. Condescending superiority quite another.
You must then think that creating more mouths to feed, is the best way of curing starvasion :roll:
THEY ARE POOR, THEY HAVE NOTHING!!!!
