Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@Mrs Clean wrote:
Suzie is what we should all aspire too, she is dignified, elegant, intelligent and fecking rich, she gets my vote!
Aspire too?
Dignity: 1 the state or quality of being worthy of respect. 2 a composed or serious manner. 3 a sense of pride in oneself.
So everyone is.
Elegant: 1 graceful and stylish. 2 pleasingly ingenious and simple.
Everyone has dignity.
Intelligent: 1 having intelligence, especially of a high level. 2 (of a device) able to vary its state or action in response to varying situations and past experience. 3 (of a computer terminal) having its own processing capability.
Everyone some of that.
Fecking rich: …..
You dont have to have dignity, need elegance or intelligence to be rich. Susie pretends to be someone she isnt, because she did not use her intelligence when nominating grace and nikki. There was no elegance in explaining why. She lost dignity afterwards.
Shes in there to be a celebrity when she gets out, thats what she aspires to becoming. Yes she is and will be rich, she may aswell have won the lottery…
@tiler wrote:
I don’t know why you have to ask, surely you know they’ve been wasting them for about 9 years.
So you agree the BNP (Nick and Mark) were not inciting racial hatred?
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
No Fraulein emma! A banana republic would be New Labour prosecuting the case, as you have implied in the starting of this thread.
The truth is, a independent body (CPS) is prosecuting the case.The CPS is a government department responsible for prosecuting criminal cases investigated by the police in England and Wales.
New Labour are the government…
So, can you think of a reason why new labour and their front line boys and girls at the cps, should be wasting OUR money trying desperately to stiffle free speech?
Not only that, but political speech that they dont agree with.
Just imagine if they could win this, they could stiffle/ban ANY political debate that they dont agree with. They could destroy for their own benefit, our freedom to vote, freedom to speak our minds. The old communistic reds of “new” labour.
PROTECT YOUR FREEDOM.
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
You cannot prove there’s any connection between the Government and decisions made by the CPS.
Therefore, it’s a post based on pure fantasy!There is a trial hearing on friday. If only it was fantasy, not the waste of taxes, spent to try and criminalise a small but legal political organisation, who spoke their opinions privately, in a democratic country where free speech is adored.
Should you be allowed to speak your mind, in you home or private meetings you may have?
Would it be justifiable for your employees to then waste your own money trying to criminalise you?
THAT would be fantasy, a banana republic.
@forumhostpb wrote:
Yes Emma – what are they accused of and by whom???
Who actually is the prosecuting authority….. the Government….. the Police….. The CPS….. Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs…… who?????
They are in court for alleged “race hate” charges.
The CPS.
From the BNP website “The CPS confirmed it wanted a retrial just weeks after the acquittal – a move which shows that this is Labour inspired vengeful persecution of members of an opposition political party”.Whatever you might think of the BNP, good or bad, the right to express your own personal feelings, in private meetings, is a fundamental human right which we SHOULD all have.
Civil Liberty support Free Speech Two http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/ourwork.htm
@tadpole wrote:
No i mean GRACE is the MOOSE, i think Susie looks good for her age.
How could you possibly think that?
Grace is slim, smart 20 and sexy.
susie is slimish, arogant, 43 and ugly. Infact, she has horse hair. Needs coming too.
@tadpole wrote:
Didnt vote for them. But lets face it there aint much to pick and chose between any of the shower.
Create your own party/be an independant?
@tadpole wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Nominating the two sexiest contestants, thus increasing the prospects of winning for yourself, and then making out its something else, was pathetic, so susie got what she deserved.
SHES A MOOSE!
Yes made me laugh when grace called her that just before she left on friday.
@cath 55 wrote:
Isnt it funny we complain about people talking in another language in our country and yet we expect everyone to speak english when we go abroad??? :roll: :roll:
hugssssssssssss xxxxx
Whos “we”, EVERY single English speaker???
I know my hola’s and aufwiedersien’s :)
@forumhostpb wrote:
These soundbites from dear kind Emmaslush are worthy of Alastair Campbell at his best.
“Governments are a problem, but many mouths keep the starving starved.”
“Whilst we live in paradise, it is a must to help in any way.”
“I wonder if its better for the globalised world to keep poor people poor.”
They are as meaningless as they are platitudinous. BTW what the heck is a ”globalised world”??? It sounds deeply significant but what does it actually mean ffs???
I havnt spoken of those words too often, that is only your opinion.
Why the use of the word “actually”, do you feel superiour when writing?
