@giggles wrote:

gonna try the queue thing btw :wink:

Yes oh yes, report back, cant wait :)
Another thing about queing, when someone in front goes forth, then we move up one place. If you stand still, the person behind you might be really eager, and bump into you, to which you just generally look at him/her, and just watch the appology that comes forth, its really funny.

I just love to watch how people behave.

You know when you walk in town, do you feel your the one who moves out the way for people, or do people move out the way for you, or is it a combined thing?

Generally i tend to move for people totally, but from time to time, i will walk up to someone and think they wont move, and just stand completely still, and the look i get from them as if i SHOULD move out the way for them, jeez, anyone u`d think they were royalty…sometimes people bounce off me :D

Im so butch LOL

@tommy-toxen wrote:

I thought you don’t conform?

Popular opinion easy…

Now you’re conforming to rules.

s? One rule that encourages my safety. Dont you care about your safety?

It’s not who you are that matters when you die. It’s how much you’ve enjoyed life while it’s there and helped others.

You certainly enjoy following me round this websites forums :wink:

@chathostuk wrote:

Obviously we do need the word ‘actually’

Why? Give me an example why we need to say that word?

@james Belfast wrote:

@emmalush wrote:

Gold star to someone who can provide a sentence that needs the word “actually”.

I saw that Hugh Grant starring in the film “Love Actually”: he was shyte btw.

Post me Gold Star to the usual addy ty.

OOh this is a tuffy. On the one hand, you provide the title of a film, and thats that, but one has to ask why they used the word, “love actually”, why “acutually”? Whats the word actually got to do with finishing a phrase? Its not needed, surely? There being you wouldnt have a shout…

BUT, thats not your fault, so Gold star to you, and some slippery banana skins for the film makers.

Catz, were the drunk people women, girly girls say actually so many times, particuly when 2 large galrses of wine have entered their system.

A friend of mine thinks we use the word “actually”, to express superiority.

Example:
Bob says, i think the score on saturday was 1-1.
Cindy replies, well actually it was 2-1 Bob.

Cindy could`ve said, it was 2-1 Bob, but if she uses the word actually, it makes what she says and herself sound more superior.

Gold star to someone who can provide a sentence that needs the word “actually”.

They can leave parliament :wink:

@slayer wrote:

I do agree his actions off pitch and his private life have been less than discreet and his judgement has not always been a good one. I agree an apology or explanation would have been appropriate and whether “stung” or not, discussing players and his future intentions whilst still under contract was damaging to his reputation

Not only to his reputation, but more importantly, the reputation of the millions of English football fans, who pay him £4,000,000 a year as an ambassordor to the English game.

@slayer wrote:

Qualified as a top seed, finished top of group with 2nd best record in the whole of Europe

Not exactly a record of failure is it

Loosing to minows of around the 100th in the world is failure, but i take your point, qualifying is the be all.

Hes brought disgrace on our nation. He is an ambassordor to the English people. We pay him vast sums of money to behave decent, and he failed miserably.

When freddy shepard (newcastle chaiman) did similar, he was booed by newcastle fans, he then had to appologise like a decent man should.

The F.A, have carte blanche to sack this expensive traitor.

@Bad Manners wrote:

Why would a newspaper who supposedly supports England’s cause deliberately set out to cause friction and division in the England camp? :? In as u say a World Cup year. This is scum journalism of the lowest kind.

Why would our England manager say terrible things about England players who will try and win the world cup? Should he be allowed to get away with it? Why isnt his proffessionalism, 100% behind our players? Does he care about our players? He should resign like a REAL gentleman.

Well done to those who exposed him, because theres no way he would`ve told us the truth on football focus…

Sven should resign with immediate effect. He should`ve resigned after loosing to minows Northern Ireland. Our performance, tactics and attitude that night, was abismal.

Sven earns £4,000,000 a year to be a solid proffessional employee of the English public. Hes at an age where he lives and dies by HIS words.

It doesnt matter whether he was stitched up, HE said what he said of HIS OWN free will. He just thought we wouldnt find out, well we did, and it took a secret filming camera crew to find out what he really thinks.

[Author]

Posts