Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
23 July, 2008 at 10:43 pm #33452223 July, 2008 at 10:26 pm #285242
I don’t dream – I nightmare. :evil:
23 July, 2008 at 10:12 pm #33451923 July, 2008 at 6:25 pm #356836@sword wrote:
@esmeralda wrote:
@~Pebbles~ wrote:
@The Chief Inspector wrote:
according to pilot he says he has been banned from JC for nearly 2 weeks so who keeps popping in as him ??? come on own up pete
beats me…. i mean why on earth would someone pretend to be a fat balding man in his 50s? :?
Because it would be a step up from admitting to being an emaciated, liver-spotted doddery old git in his nineties! :roll:
Leave Hoseason alone, he’ll ban you… :wink:

23 July, 2008 at 5:57 pm #356834@~Pebbles~ wrote:
@The Chief Inspector wrote:
according to pilot he says he has been banned from JC for nearly 2 weeks so who keeps popping in as him ??? come on own up pete
beats me…. i mean why on earth would someone pretend to be a fat balding man in his 50s? :?
Because it would be a step up from admitting to being an emaciated, liver-spotted doddery old git in his nineties! :roll:
23 July, 2008 at 3:56 pm #281822LENE LOVITCH
Too tender to touch, too fragile to love
These misty eyes are just enough
A little sign to guide the way;
We don’t need so very muchYou and I together now, forever after only, yes;
A staring smile, a frozen face, a photograph of lasting love
That never knew a nicer place than tucked inside my pillowcaseToo tender to touch, too fragile to last;
These misty eyes are just enough
A little sign to guide the way;
We don’t need so very muchMy desire, all I need; romance until the end of time
The taste of love is bittersweet; my hungry heart is satisfied
To give myself to only you, and be nobody else’s foolToo tender to touch, too fragile to last;
These misty eyes are just enough
A little sign to guide the way;
We don’t need so very muchToo tender to touch, too fragile to last;
These misty eyes are just enough
A little sign to guide the way;
We don’t need so very much23 July, 2008 at 3:22 pm #165992@sharongooner wrote:
@esmeralda wrote:
@sharongooner wrote:
@esmeralda wrote:
panhygrous
yer…. :wink:
whats that mean then? :lol:
Moist in all parts.


oh I say mrs! :lol:
Im more than a bit sweaty myself, it doesnt do getting rid of the thunderbugs any good, they are sticking to me, the swines!
I didn’t mean in the perspiration sense, Shazza. More..um..the sensual one.

23 July, 2008 at 3:18 pm #356815@Sgt Pepper wrote:
Pride cometh before a fall..
:wink:
Oh I DO hope you’re not implying that the lovely Empress Esme could in any way be considered an arrogant, conceited, ebeneous egotist, desperate for éclat yet poised for a tantive tumble into turbulent torrents from her lofty tambour?
I’m just humble li’l ol’ me.Ha!

23 July, 2008 at 2:59 pm #165990@sharongooner wrote:
@esmeralda wrote:
panhygrous
yer…. :wink:
whats that mean then? :lol:
Moist in all parts.

23 July, 2008 at 2:53 pm #355839@Bad Manners wrote:
@pete wrote:
No cause one way or the other dead people are dead Guess if i wanted to see them enough i would but that would be my head not the dead
If you mean that all these people are imagining things or hallucinating then I dont buy it.
I believe there is something to it. I dont think it’s fair to dismiss millions of people as being mass hallucinators. What i dont understand is why people automatically label “Ghosts” as spirits of the dead. I see no evidence to support that.
We really have little idea how the world works or how time works. I prefer the theory that these Ghosts are Time Slips or people from Parallel Universes.
I rather posit the suggestion that ‘ghosts’ and ‘ghostly’ events, are probably imprints on buildings and atmospheres, like music laid down onto plastic..LPs, CDs and so on. Thus the spectres replaying certain imprinted scenes over and over again.
I could, of course, simply be talking out of my backside!

-
AuthorPosts
