Fair-D

I’m aware of them, but I don’t agree with any of their ideas. STV is my favorite voting method, but they want to replace local MPs with a regional blocks of representatives. I can’t see what the purpose of doing this would be. I think it would instead be better to apply this concept in a replacement for the house of lords.

Edit:

Using STV to…[Read more]

I’m aware of them, but I don’t agree with any of their ideas. STV is my favorite voting method, but they want to replace local MPs with a regional blocks of representatives. I can’t see what the purpose of doing this would be. I think it would instead be better to apply this concept in a replacement for the house of lords.

I’m aware of them, but I don’t agree with any of their ideas. STV is my favorite voting format, but they want to replace local MPs with a regional blocks of representatives. I can’t see what the purpose of doing this would be. I think it would instead be better to apply this concept in a replacement for the house of lords.

In the 2015 election UKIP recieved 10,801 more votes than the combined total of the SNP and Lib Dems.

(UKIP had 3,881,099 votes, Lib Dems had 2,415,862 and SNP had got 1,454,436)

It’s still trading at 1.28 to the US dollar, seems like it will stay there for awhile.

Better than I expected.

The oposition refusing a general election would be an open admission that their party is a failure and has no chance of winning. This is of course true, but neither Corbyn or his party can take this stance if they want the Labour party to continue to exist.

UKIP’s core voter base doesn’t trust May at all, the phase they use is ‘closet…[Read more]

The content of the article is the problem, not the authour. The Huffington Post editors read the article and thought it was a good thing to publish on their outlet.

It doesn’t matter if it was a hoax or not, the issue is that the editors approved the contents being published.

This kind of thing is why the right is gaining momentum. If people on the left don’t like this then they should try to stop the people who represent them from being racist.

Trump needs backing of the Senate for his Supreme Court appointment, and some other things. Which is a Republican majority currently I believe, so Trump has to have the support of the people those senators represent.

I already made that point defendant. Lol

I don’t mean to be negative, i know this thread was posted with good intentions.

But things like that kind of annoy me.

What about male victims of domestic violence?

This is illegal in some countries, I know that France for example has a right of oblivion, which requires account deletions.

American politicians have to say things like that to secure their own position, especially the right wing ones. I have never seen Trump say anything about God before starting his presidential campaign, but maybe someone can disprove that.