ForumHostPB

BTW: If I have to listen to just one more judge repeating the phrase “comfort zone” ……. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

I also disagree with the high opinion of Diana (or whatever her name is).

She is all a collection of gimmicks trying to make her…[Read more]

Eoghan was off key, has timing issues and is trading on his little boy lost looks. He is still in the competition because some of the others are so dire that he manages to look good.

Give it a couple more weeks and he’ll get shown up for what he is – a poor singer who is totally out of his depth.

@Reason wrote:

Just to add,i was in the lobby on wednesday night when a number of “reg” chatters took it upon themselves to use the word you love bat…..yes the C word……..as many times as was humanly possible,the room emptied somewhat,that’s what i call “ironic” :wink:

You might call it “ironic” ….. I suspect that most people would call it “moronic”

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

The thing is…it wasnt so long ago that sweaty balls himself was banned for doing precisely what he seems to have got the hump about..being abusive. How ironic eh.

Yup the irony hadn’t escaped me Pebbles …. as perhaps my response indicated.

Than you for you invaluable contribution “Reason” and in particular thank you, on behalf of the Staff, for your comments about them. I’m sure they’ll be as impressed as I was.

Don’t go there Pebbles …. just don’t go there.

@sharongooner wrote:

we could do that to John, but I want a secret society first, it will make me feel important. :lol:

Sorry Sharon … you can’t be a Freemason – only males are admitted to that ‘society’.

@chickenman wrote:

Is it still ok to abuse myself ??

Self abuse is permitted …… but not in public please !!! ( :wink: )

@JohnBoy25 wrote:

Well I’ll certainly try to refrain from getting over defensive. That really doesn’t help anyone.

Even though you don’t respect my dog’s memory :lol: :lol:

Well said John….. and thank you.

I’m sorry about your woofer’s post/thread – I didn’t delete it myself and I don’t remember what was on it so commenting constructively is…[Read more]

@Sir Actor wrote:

PB hasn’t gone soft he’s just gone politically correct.
And he’s obviously been offered one of sword’s infamous “olives branches” too by the looks of it.
My god how times change on JC and I wonder who the real movers and shakers are in this place now.

I don’t do politically correct – i’m probably a bit too long in the tooth for…[Read more]

@JohnBoy25 wrote:

To those who will undoubtedly whinge that the boards will become somewhat anodyne or boring and the threads will be all ‘lovey-dovey’ and ‘mhahh’ riddled I will say just this:

DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT YOURSELF.

Is that really such a good idea though? As has been shown, that’s just as likely to lead to confrontation as anything else…

[Read more]

Thanks for that explanation Wildwolf – hopefully it will serve to put their minds at rest for those who use this type of internet connection.

I guess that the overall message coming out of this is that your wireless internet connection IS secure BUT only if you take care to use a secure password to protect access to it. Also it underlines the…[Read more]

In response to Fastcars’ several well made points:

The general feeling expresed over the last several months is that the message boards had become (perhaps by default) far too confrontational. This is as much the fault of Moderation in allowing it to get this way, as is it the fault of those who were indulging themselves in their personal…[Read more]

@JohnBoy25 wrote:

Thats twice now this evening that comments of mine have been deleted…yours as well sian (well yours was more of a smirk )

Someone’s deleted a post I made about my dog in a thread about pets, that’s evil! My poor dog, rejected by JC

That kinda depends on what the dog’s name was eh?

I haven’t had a sense of humour bypass operation – at least not yet anyway.

I suspect that the ”selling papers” argument is the more likely one. This story got the level of publicity it did because the alleged (and proven innocent) rapist was a publicly known person. If it had been some bloke from Wherever-on-Tyne that nobody had ever heard of, the national Media probably wouldn’t have even bothered to report it.

As it…[Read more]

@~Tickled Pink~ wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

They should actually chuck the girl in Jail for a year or two, and let her think about what’s she’s done.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1078611/BREAKING-NEWS-Former-Emmerdale-actor-Ben-Freeman-cleared-rape.html

And if what if she really was raped? You would have an innocent person thrown in…

[Read more]

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

ah ha! So..the question is, whos been squealing to PB in pm? Bloody spoil sports. Its only a bit of harmless banter. Take that away and the place becomes a morgue.

…the thing is, something doesnt add up…how come sword is being so nice lately as well?? :-k

It’s not just PM’s that have been sent. You only have to read the…[Read more]

The problem is that when one party to a rape claim is given anonymity and not the other, there will ALWAYS be incidents like this one where an innocent person is stigmatised for life as a result of an (unproved or totally false) accusation.

Equally, if females are named in court, ESPECIALLY when they are proved to be the victim of a rape, then I…[Read more]