Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Er… it started off as only millions of animals being killed and a whole long page later on it was billions of animals etc.
I lost the will to live after reading the first 32 paragraphs …. tell me somebody, how does it end?
Sure Mary, but that argument can cut both ways – if you remove all women etc etc.
But this is in reality never going to happen whereas – and back to the theme – if women were more relaxed and permissive about casual sex, men wouldn’t need prostitutes. This is the reason that they (prostitutes) can make a living out of selling sex.
No hang-ups about relationships or ”will you respect me in the morning?”. The answer is … who cares??? Just get yer knickers off and stop the yapping.No rubbish about relationships, just get ’em off girl.
It’s the old old story isn’t it? Do you ‘blame’ the prostitute for selling sex or do you blame the ‘customer’ for creating the demand by buying it?
My theory is that it isn’t the prostitute’s fault that there is a need for their services – it is the fault of ‘non-prostitutes’ or ordinary women – amateurs if you prefer.
If women in general put it about a bit more more and were prepared to have a quick bang, no questions asked, then the need for prostitutes would diminish to the point where they wouldn’t have any customers. The laws of supply and demand would operate – take away the demand and the supply dries up (metaphorically speaking of course).
The fact is that if a bloke feels like a shag or a BJ after a night out on the beer and a curry to top it off with …. what options are open to him?
Approaching an ‘amateur’ in the queue for a curry or whatever and suggesting a quickie in the back of the car, or behind the local bus shelter, would possibly be met with some form of rejection.
So can he do?? He pops round to his local red light district and there before his eyes, ready and waiting just for him, is a whole selection of georgeous females ready and willing to fulfil his needs.
No questions asked, just bung us a fiver (or whatever the current going rate is), then all he has to do is perform the three ”W’s” (whip it in, whip it out, and wipe it). Can’t say fairer than that now, can you?
So come on amateurs, sort yourselves out and put it about a bit more OK? Remember, the scourge of prostitution on our streets is all YOUR fault.
Who meeeee???? Never !!!
I just think that it’s such a pity when two young people meet and fall deeply in love with other st first sight, certain others feel the need to spread rumours that they are somehow unsuited and that it will never work.
So few people are prepared to make a commitment to each other in marriage these days, it is a pleasure to see that Witey and Gizmo are going to do the decent thing and cement their love in Holy Matrimony.
As Witey knows, a dog is not just for Christmas, it’s for life … and he is following this maxim in his commitment to Gizmo. I am sure that they wil live happily ever after.
Actually I think the term ”pwned” is a misspelling of ”pawned”. The user is trying to suggest that they have three balls – i.e. more balls that most other men.
Delighted to hear it terminator, but you’d be surprised at just how many internet users ARE stupid enough to be taken in by these fraudsters.
Some of the sites are really clever and look and feel justlike the real thing.
BTW they usually insert a ”code” into the e-mail to identify which recipient (e-mail address) visits their site, even out of a sense of curiousity. If nothing else this will confirm that they have a ”live e-mail address and will attract even more spam.
The golden rule is NEVER visit one of these ‘phishing’ sites, delete the e-mail without opening it. Banks and other financial institutions or organisations will NEVER mail you to ask you to ”verify” your account details.
@woman wrote:
LOL ForumHostPB lol now you got me laughing now and I hope that you are happy with yourself that I am laughing my butt off lol. :lol: :wink:
‘Woman’, it is always a pleasure to encourage you to laugh, even if it has the effect of making your ”butt” come off. It is just possible that you may be catching on to the English sense of humour.
The next project on which I’d like to work with you is your spelling, grammar and use of syntax. To do this will you please use the spell checking facility that come as a ‘bolt on’ with this message Board.
To use it, please highlight the words that you want to spell check (or all of them if necessary) and then press the following key combination: Ctrl + Alt + F4. This will enable the function and will remove any words that are incorrect.
HOW DARE YOU !!!!! You’ve been away for not far short of a YEAR and you have the cheek to simply say ”Hi I’m back”.
No word of explanation, no apologies for not letting us know where you were, no messages, no postings, NOTHING AT ALL !!!!!
Well it’s simply NOT good enough young lady. Either you mend your ways or ………………..
….. continued for 2 more hours.
@angel1 wrote:
tut , me not on there :(:(:( (witey and giz aint a couple no more huff Mr Angel1 and me should be there huff huff hufff )
:):):):) :lol: :lol: :lol:
Don’t talk such utter rubbish Angel. Witey and Gizmo ARE a couple. They are deeply in love and are engaged ffs. The wedding will be in August 2007 – Christ they even announced it on these Boards months ago.
Loads of people have been invited (including me I might add). It will be a really happy and joyous occasion celebrating the deep and lasting love of these two young people.
@emmalush wrote:
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
Fraulein emmalush; you’re no better than al Qaeda in that you strive to exploit peoples fears.
A bit like when the political and social leader of our country told us that sadam was going to blow us all up, or al queada in any of the past 2 christamas’s and this one, and on all the 9/11’s since 9/11 etc etc ONE? attack.
Fear has been exploited by the people YOU consider as ok people.
And…arnt you striving to exploit people’s fears about what i say :wink:
No Emma, Owen is a bit worried because Tony, the failed musician, has been interviewed by the Police today in connection with bribery, corruption and peerages. Of course he is totally innocent of all possible allegations …… isn’t he????
Actually Owen’s bestest mate Tony, is having a bit of a bad week. His ex-Minister of Defence, Jeff ”Buff” Hoon has had to cop to letting our troops go to Iraq without proper kit AND misleading Parliament over their overseas bonuses. Well at least “Buff” Hoon has apologised in case anybody misunderstood what he thought he meant but didn’t really mean ….er …. !!!
He has had to preside over the SFO pulling its enquiry into corrupt payments allegedly made to the Saudis by BAC, when only a week ago his Ministers were denying that any such thing would (or could) ever happen. “We will rigorously pursue wrongdoing and corruption in big business wherever we find it”. Oh yes … really ???
in spite of claiming ”No more Tory sleaze”, it doesn’t half look as though his slogan should have been “Yippee, it’s our turn at the trough”.
