Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@Bad Manners wrote:
As far as I know Charlie had a mistress on tap as well PB. It wasnt as if she was alone in doing that.
Yes apparently he did…. but at least he was reasonably discreet about it.
(Apart from posing for a calendar that is !!!)
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
The whole “she wasn’t fit for her position” thing is just about guilt for losing an empire. :lol:
Oh she was ”fit for her position” alright. Problem is that the position in question was underneath most of the Household Cavalry.
@Bad Manners wrote:
I think the Royal Family would have been far better for her being Queen.
Yes sure…. can you just imagine the ceremony of Trooping the Colour??? As the Household Cavalry rides past Queen Diana they swap notes about how many of the officers rode her last week and whether she was as good as Doris the barmaid down the Coach & Horses.
As for drinking a toast to the health of Her Majesty…… it doesn’t bear thinking about.
Oh Gawd Tommy – don’t start that one ffs. He’ll go on and on back in time and history until he ”proves” that the Palestinians got there first – and anyway their human rights have been eroded etc etc.
If memory serves he has gone back to 2000 BC so far !!!
There’s a very simple answer to someone who wants to bully you. A good solid smack in the mouth may offend…… but it sure makes your point clear !!!!!
Do you suppose that Mr B is a Palestinian??? He sure seems to take their side on just about everything. Maybe we should make him ”kick like a kipper” for sympathising with terrorists.
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
Well, she wasn’t COMMON after all. :lol:
But seriously, she WAS a human being. She had motives and drives the same as the rest of us. She might have been misguided at times but she tried to do right. If I can say that on my deathbed, I’ll be happy.
Fascist!
:lol:Hmmmmm !!! Emmas favourite ”F” word eh???
Human she may have been, but a good moral example as a future Queen of England she most certainly was not.
I guess that the central point is that if a person marries into the Royal family then certain standards of behaviour are required of them. It’s bad enough when somebody’s wife can’t keep her legs closed with any bloke that comes along and offers to buy her a drink….. but when it is a public figure the ”offence” is made much worse.
If the accident that caused her death hadn’t happened, Christ knows what she would have been doing by now.
@james Belfast wrote:
I find it extremely offensive!! (does that mean PB has to get rid of the pic?)
Only if it’s pig’s blood – to avoid offending Muslims or Jews you understand.
In which case I stand (or twitch) corrected – ”kick like kippers” it is then.
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
Actually i’m as pure as the driven slush – but that’s another story.
Fact is that I am not a member of the Royal family, I’m not an internation public figure, and most important of all…………….. i only played Rugby, I didn’t shag half the England team.
So you are allowed to hide behind your anonymity. Good for you! I don’t think Dianna ever asked to have her every move scrutinised by the whole world. :? So she liked to French Connection UK? So what?
I would have. :PYes I am …. along with 99.999 % of the rest of the UK population. She spent most of her waking day being ”an icon’ and assiduously courting publicity from the world’s Media. If she was going to behave like a common tart, the least she could have done is be discreet about it.
I suppose that there is one good thing to say about her…. she confined her sportmen shagging to Rugby players and (as far as we know) didn’t ‘entertain’ the Premier football leagues.
