Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Make yer mind up – ”In” or ”Out” what is it??? I am now hoplessly confused (which is not unusual).
You know I’m delighted that the news of my phantom pregnancy has given birth to these lovely reminiscences from all the experienced Mums out there.
It is so nice to read through the heartwarming stories of how much you all enjoyed your pregnancies. I feel that I am really missing out on something here.
@Beatty Blue wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
@The Observer wrote:
I hope you are not worried that I will come out, on top :wink:
She’s worried that you might just come out !!!
like you did that is?
No Beatty, my problem is getting in in the first place. I’ve found that a regular thrashing with stinging nettles helps. But hey, each to their own.
@tommy-toxen wrote:
I wasn’t insulting you. I don’t do insults much !!!
And PB is allowed to be a balding old overweight bloke.. he doesn’t have a skinny gal in his avatar :D
This is true Tommy – my siggy pic is in fact a remarkably accurate portrayal even down to the blood stained apron and hat.
Also I have never made a claim to be a ”slim” size 12 in breach of the Trade Descriptions Act.
@robbo wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
She’s not REALLY fat Robbo – she’s a size 12 (or so she says).
Yep thats true. There are so many users who lie about there age, weight, looks, so who knows what size she is. For all we know, she could be double that :wink:
What you mean a size 24 ?????? You may wish to think that….. I couldn’t possibly comment.
Mind you if you are correct – she sure could use a few swipes on the bacon slicer
She’s not REALLY fat Robbo – she’s a size 12 (or so she says).
Gee I wish I was only 50 Emma but time marches on huh?
Oh and I’ve never claimed to be a size 12.
@The Observer wrote:
I hope you are not worried that I will come out, on top :wink:
She’s worried that you might just come out !!!
@The Observer wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
I’m sure you’re right Tommy, but misrepresentation is still misrepresentation – innocent or otherwise.
Would you consider ‘missrepresentation’ to be a misrepresentation of ‘misrepresentation’?
Innocent or otherwise. :)
Yes, provided that this was actually her name. If not then of course it is a misleading trade description.
I’m sure you’re right Tommy, but misrepresentation is still misrepresentation – innocent or otherwise.
I expect that there’s a queue outside the Trading Standards Office by now.
