Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Bye bye Bunny and remember – marriage is only legalised sexual intercourse.
Pork sausages & marmalade ….. mmmmmm yummy.
As with the above contributors, i am also enhanced CRB checked, because of my role as a school governor. I work with the LA’s safeguarding team and see some of the things that so-called parents do to their children at first hand.
That said, it is still the parents that do it ….. NOT the social workers. I get really bored by the people who on the one hand say “You are responsible when a father sexually abuses his child” and yet on the other hand are quick to condemn social workers for being intrusive interfering busybodies if they make enquiries based only on suspicions etc.
The thing that I find most disturbing out of all this safeguarding stuff is that 99 times out of 100, it is the child’s parent(s) that are the ones responsible for carrying out the abuse.
We, the taxpayers, spend a huge amount of our cash instituting numerous procedures to protect children …. NOT from predatory paedophiles (in the main) but from their own feckless bloody parents.
Compulsory sterilisation would be a way to prevent all this.
It is a persistent little bugger and really difficult to remove. From memory Spyware Doctor should do it – but it isn’t freeware.
Whatever else you do ….. DON’T buy a special removal tool as they are usually cons to get your money.
True … to a point.
Road Traffic Act offences are dealt with (usually) in Magistrates Courts (more serious cases are dealt with in the Crown Courts in front of a Judge etc). – i.e. criminal courts as opposed to being dealt with under civil law in the County Courts or High Court.
Breaches of these laws are prosecuted in the form “R – vs – Bloggs” as opposed to “Smith – vs – Bloggs” ….. thus Road Traffic offences are criminal offences dealt with under the criminal law system.
Q.E.D.
Is this so-called “Anti virus” programme called something like “Windows Anti-virus 2008” by any chance? If, as I suspect, it is then you have been infected by “rogue” anti spyware that exists solely to get you to spend money buying it.
It mimics the Windows security centre page and is cleverly designed to look authentic and as if it is ‘authorised’ by Windows. In fact it detects nothing at all and simply plagues you with false positives.
It originates in the Russian Federation and if you are gullible enough to follow the ‘buy me’ links and provide your credit card details – you can expect it to be cloned and money ripped from your account.
BTW – you will find that, like Syphilis, removing it is somewhat more difficult than getting it in the first place.
@kent f OBE wrote:
I knew you couldn’t resist lol ….unfortunately these things happen, people somtimes mistakingly break rules/the law, the lines or lack of them are extremely relevant as well you know…therefore i have every right to appeal and I wont be quietly paying my fine…btw seen as your so uppity about the law and rules check out your forums somtime and clamp down on the people who are always breaking the rules on abusive behaviour and fine them!!! …make them just pay quietly of course and go away………..(i can so feel a ban coming on ) :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Yes you were right … I just had to bite didn’t I? Wouldn’t it be nice to fine chatroom users …. but totally impracticable, as I suspect you already knew. Imagine using a free facility but being fined if you break the rules.
Also. I find it slightly difficult to make the comparison between somebody breaking the criminal law (by speeding) and a silly little testosterone laden chappie getting all mouthy in a chatroom …… or a gum chewing ‘woteva’ swinging her Burberry handbag around for that matter.
Oh sorry ….. I rather thought that the main issue WAS the fact that you broke the law. Maybe I’ve misunderstood your rant.
If you had been driving WITHIN the relevant speed limit then the camers would not have “nearly blinded” you with its flash ….. and the issue of road markings would be irrelevant.
Sorry if this point was too obvious for you. Anyway, pay your fine ….. accept your penalty points ….. keep within speed limits in the future and doubtless the Kent Contabulary won’t be troubling you in the future.
