Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
1 June, 2011 at 3:06 pm #463903
mmmmmmm cherry chapstick, suddenly
1 June, 2011 at 3:05 pm #469472LMKO love it Cosy
1 June, 2011 at 2:30 pm #469466@taffyfish wrote:
Ahhhh i found a pic of Cosy…. :lol: :lol:
Shyte, ive just said he can come over :lol:
1 June, 2011 at 2:29 pm #463899and stung him on
1 June, 2011 at 2:24 pm #262339Dublin Eh?? Cosy – cmon then :wink:
1 June, 2011 at 1:22 pm #262337New Zealand and also would like to go back to Canada
1 June, 2011 at 1:20 pm #462686Also on the ONE word thread – Sassy put up her word and you replied with this
@yogi1 wrote:
Skanky
Slut
Harlot
Slaphound (arguably two words, granted)Just pick any one from the above and it’s virtually synonymous with Aussie Sassy. A few months ago she confided in me that she had had between 20 and 25 internet relationships since 2005. Some of these she said were quasi serious, others she described as “real intense” and claimed that the prospect for marriage was high. Still others she said were simply to “get me through the night” which i took to mean that these men were used as a masturbatory supplement when her much maligned personal dil.do and vast array of romance novels just weren’t cutting it. I found this shameful, treacherous, blatantly absurd, but I admit I was moved a tad when she lamented that her weird dependency on cyber men basically evolves from the fact that no one in her native Australia, in her locality, looks at her sexually. Thus she’s in the peculiar position of being an innate slut without the clientele.
Little wonder then that I did not take it very seriously when she has occasionally pmed telling me I’m the only one. Chatters such as Archi, Geoff, and Davids511 have reported similar encounters.
On the plus side, as it is beyond dispute that she is a silly ho, at least her contribution to this thread has the ring of honesty.
Stop trying to defend yourself, if you pick on someone of course their going to reply. Fùcking dope.
1 June, 2011 at 1:11 pm #4694641 June, 2011 at 1:03 pm #462685@yogi1 wrote:
This thread shouldn’t even exist. Not because it’s juvenile and ridiculous (although it is) but because it’s a total misrepresentation. It was written BEFORE I set the record straight. I successfully countered the unfortunate fallout of the asphyxiation scandal (to which this thread alludes to) two or three days later. I did this primarily by demonstrating what’s already a well known fact, that the difference between limp status and erect status can be quite significant (not to mention that things like cold climate only effect a limp one) What was on display then was a very healthy slab of erect manhood, a genuinely shining tower of sexual potency. Not only was it not small, it was in fact considerably larger than average (though admittedly not massive) But conveniently for some of the sorrier elements in here, they prefer to omit that and focus on the condition of a softy on a cold day, as if that’s what actually matters when it comes down to business in the sack. To insinuate that someone with my kind of endowment is somehow small shows a total divorce from reality. It is pure fantasy and it’s getting a bit tiresome as well.
Fking Idiots.
LMAO even the pics you put up didnt show you in a good light. awwwww YOGI thats NOT big, bless ya in fact your under average even when hard !!!!
1 June, 2011 at 10:00 am #463883kamera, the couple seen
-
AuthorPosts



