Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
12 May, 2006 at 5:39 pm #214690
I don’t normally get involved in posts like these but I do find it strange that Ugo should attack Pete of all people? Even Ugo should be able to see he is in a no-win situation with this one!!!
12 May, 2006 at 5:28 pm #215196CONGRATULATIONS!!! To ALL the winners.
Now can we get back to work please, we have a chatsite to save! :wink:
12 May, 2006 at 3:42 pm #215217@Bad Manners wrote:
Im gonna go for a high scoring affair here. 4-2 to Hearts.
Hmmm – two high-scoring teams playing – that probably means 0-0 then!!!!!!
Bet it won’t be a cagey start!! If we see early goals then it could be the highest ever score in a Cup Final, just hope Jambos score most of them! I hate predicting scores for my team but I will go for Hearts to score early in a blitzkreig, Gretna to freeze like rabbits in headlights and 6-1 to Hearts. Could even be more goals……
I will show my face here tomorrow night no matter what to take the stick for this RIDICULOUS prediction!
12 May, 2006 at 3:18 pm #214543@forumhostpb wrote:
OK so some don’t like the colour scheme – sorry about that. But hey, this is what we have people so why not just get on with it and use the facilities to enjoy yourself eh???
Yeah, feck the customer eh? If they don’t like it they can go find another site! Is JC so flush with good regs all of a sudden that it can afford to drive them away?
I think it is a pity that people are complaining about the colour scheme rather than coo-ing about the new features and I am sure we all appreciate the efforts put in by you and Martin in particular but the fact is the glare is excessive and it HURTS a lot of people’s eyes. I have to turn my colour and contrast down to the lowest setting, thus affecting the appearance of any other websites I want to look at (which is a fecking pain)! And if I wear my sunglasses in the house I often bang my shins on small tables or walk into walls..
The thing is, are we REALLY stuck with this colour-scheme? If you explain WHY this is the case, it might make people accept it a bit easier and go splash out on screen filters or a pair of raybans rather than fecking off to some other site.
11 May, 2006 at 9:45 pm #215028@Mr Amphibian wrote:
LSHABOWCOOTEOMP! :lol:
(you might have to search a few message boards to find the meaning of that one)Can’t be ar sed – what does it mean?
11 May, 2006 at 7:57 pm #214870I think we have had this thread before Herrmaaaaannn – maybe check a few pages back? Also look at Jokes threads and, if still stuck, google it!!!!!!
11 May, 2006 at 7:32 pm #214531I don’t see the poll revealing that 19 people like it Tommy. I see 11 people have said that they like or love it. At least 3 of these votes will be from you and your aliases, 2 or 3 are probably from PB, God knows how many votes Martin can give himself and 1 may be from Pat or Bat or Rainbowrite, all of whom have clearly been bribed with drugs or chocolate or something.
If 19 people (or 11) have said they love it, let’s see the names!
The fact is, we will just have to lump it as we all enjoy JC, but it is shyte decor so lets not pretend otherwise eh? How could someone say the new colour scheme was ‘soothing’? Are they nuts or just @rse licking? It is far too stark and I would rather we went back to the old colour scheme – pastel shades which helps calm mentals down!
10 May, 2006 at 10:55 pm #203776Is stage seven when you started writing poetry William?
10 May, 2006 at 9:35 pm #128569Skyblue hasn’t posted since July ffs – she has probably killed her boyfriend and served her prison sentence by now!
10 May, 2006 at 9:24 pm #214651…and after a few months in chat you come on the boards Cath – where you might not get the same amount of spontaneity, but you get a break from the pervs. On the downside, you have to put up with Ugo, DOA and the racists but you’ll do ok. Welcome!
-
AuthorPosts
