@panda12 wrote:
@mrs_teapot wrote:
Not at all…..where does it say those guys are innocent…… it questions the investigation, and how effective the police were… whether you like it or not it will be what the appeal will be based on. Lets hope the police have been thorough and the conviction stands.
So thin’s first post in no way suggests they are innocent by implying the police have deliberately “planted” this new, and incriminating evidence?
And his later reference to the Colin Stagg case in no way implies the police have “fitted” Norris and Dobson up for this murder in the same way Stagg was fitted up?
You really are far too nice, Mrs Teapot. Your good nature does blossom.
Well my interpretation is no.one has questioned the guilt of these people, I wont speak for others here but truly I think we are all of one mind… the guilty result was the right one… but I think there will be an appeal and as I said previously I hope the police have done their job properly for the conviction to stand.