Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
24 October, 2012 at 12:44 pm #513411
@kent f OBE wrote:
I think this is bad idea for all the reasons given and many more…where will it end?
However maybe the footballers felt nothing is being done against racism within the game and decided to take a different approach? Don’t know obviously, just a thought
Compared to many other countries, England has an excellent record in tackling racism in football.
Overall, there are relatively few incidents in this country. Unfortunately, two came along at once last year involving high profile footballers.
Suarez of Liverpool was severely dealt with by the FA. John Terry was given a tap on the wrist. I think that’s what the real issue here – the fact that whenever this detestable excuse for a footballer does anything wrong, (and he has history) he always comes up smelling of roses. One day his reputation as a footballer will no longer be able to sustain him.
24 October, 2012 at 12:33 pm #513456I’m not sure why I pay into a pension. I’m 39 next month. I doubt retirement will be an option when I get to my 60s.
24 October, 2012 at 8:24 am #513292@rogue trader wrote:
my parents had one of these


Oh my God!
My grandparents had one of those as well!
It’s called retro today, y’know. :P
24 October, 2012 at 6:32 am #512082Accusations that he was into necrophilia have re -surfaced again this morning. Apparently he visited the mortuary alone.
Savile denied he was a necrophiliac – then again, he also denied he was a paedophile.
*shudders
I wish the tv would stop showing that clip of him running and which does a close up of his face where he looks directly into the camera. I suppose they keep re – running it because in it, he looks hideously evil.
24 October, 2012 at 12:54 am #513290@momentaryloss wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
Sleep?
If found, please return to Panda @ Panda Palace, Panda Parade, Pandamonium, PAN DA12
Ta x
Just read a few of my posts – always works for me!
:lol: :lol: :lol:
zzzZZZ
24 October, 2012 at 12:53 am #508057@momentaryloss wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@tinks wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
Just read this – we should get out the EU!
http://www.shropshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/Badgers+and+bovine+TB/Cattle+vaccination
interesting reading
It is.
*waits for Terry to adopt the badgers for his anti EU platform :wink:
The article only says that some of the EU rules would have to change to allow for vaccines to be used. It goes on to state that, if there was a more sensitive test which differentiated between infected and vaccinated animals, vaccination would be allowed in certain circumstances. That is also the position of the UK government, interestingly enough.
As we knew already, we need a scientific advance on vaccines and testing to allow cattle to be vaccinated instead of destroyed, and to allow badgers to be left in peace.
If we can get the science right, the EU will not stop it.
8)
They got the science right for humans – probably by testing on animals in the first place.
24 October, 2012 at 12:19 am #513288Sleep?
If found, please return to Panda @ Panda Palace, Panda Parade, Pandamonium, PAN DA12
Ta x
23 October, 2012 at 8:05 pm #51179723 October, 2012 at 7:56 pm #508055@tinks wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
Just read this – we should get out the EU!
http://www.shropshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/Badgers+and+bovine+TB/Cattle+vaccination
interesting reading
It is.
*waits for Terry to adopt the badgers for his anti EU platform :wink:
23 October, 2012 at 7:51 pm #513201 -
AuthorPosts

