[panda12]

@jen_jen wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

Just had cheese on toast for lunch! :P

Is it fattening though? :-k

Nah the calories leak out as the cheese melts…

Hmmm.

So if I consume vast quantites and I do put on weight, can I call Injury Lawyers 4 U and sue you for false and misleading information?

Naturally, I will also sue you for causing me to become obese and for trauma and any other subsequent health problems I may suffer.

:D

[panda12]

Just had cheese on toast for lunch! :P

Is it fattening though? :-k

[panda12]

@kent f OBE wrote:

Maybe the only reason he doesn’t reveal where Keith’s body is, is because he can’t remember….who knows…I think even if he does know the location it’s pretty certain he won’t reveal it as he has already “died” and never revealed just before, and anyway we don’t know when we are going to die so it won’t be his last breath
It would be good if Winnie’s wishes were continued and Brady suffered and suffered, however he is a drain on resources. Mind you he’s been kept all these years so another few won’t hurt
Like Poli I am a bit undecided though….as humans when we start to wish and want to inflict pain on another human being (although I class him as an animal) what kind of person does it make us?

If there is any kind of “life” up there…Keith is with his mum

Tut! Animals are better than Brady. Germs are better than Brady. In fact, anything is better than Brady.

The question is though, is Brady suffering? I don’t think he is. If he’s in pain, he gets pain relief.

I think, despite his protests, he actually enjoys being alive so he can continue the torment for the Bennett family. Whilst he is alive, there is hope for the family that he will reveal where Keith is buried.

I doubt he can remember but he has all the playing cards here – the family are kept hanging on with the thoughts of does he or doesn’t he know where Keith is buried and will he or won’t he reveal the burial site?

I think he should just be left to die and I think that will bring a sense of closure to the Bennett family.

Regardless of whether Brady is alive or not, they will still continue to search for Keith and if Brady is dead, they won’t have this despicable, remorseless speciman laughing and gloating at them, as no doubt he does when another search proves fruitless.

[panda12]

@kent f OBE wrote:

@anc wrote:

I reckon to forgive someone who has in some way violated your body (or someone you knows’), you either gotta be extremely brave or turn to religion.

Therefore, I do kinda see where Poli is coming from, but just don’t think that I could do it, and don’t understand how those that do (if they really do) – if ya get my drift!

I agree what you’re saying…maybe they are able to deal with it…would take an incredible person to be able to forigive such violation

I think mental scars remain forever, (regardless of what type of trauma a person has been through) and they affect how that person’s life develops.

I don’t think anybody can truly move on, or forgive and forget – the hurt and pain is never far below the surface.

[panda12]

To me, the only reason to keep him alive is so that he can reveal where Keith Bennett is buried.

But for whatever reason, he’s not going to do that so let the git die and stop the drain on the public finances.

If it was any other murdering paedophile, there would probably be some on here calling for the death penalty.

[panda12]

antibiotics

[panda12]

@j_in_france wrote:

Panda – where have I criticised the UK – all I said was it was sad that the British law system allowed the two cases to happen but if you think it was right that Ian Bennetts mother went to her grave not knowing where Ian Brady was buried then you carry on.
Ruby – nice to see you jumping on the bandwagon but you are the one looking an eejit if you think the two cases are an excuse to have a go at people

Re-read your post. I take it you wrote it under the “influence” of your sophisticated, cheap French, plonk?

You’re the eejit here, mate.

You cannot even get the facts right or the name of the murdered child, Keith Bennet, correct.

And Ian Brady is not dead, which is the whole point of this thread. :roll:

It’s an even bigger faux pas than you thinking Ruby and Wake were the same person!

[panda12]

@j_in_france wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

Quite simply;

What human rights did Ian Brady offer the children he tortured to death?

What did Abu Hamza offer the victims of his hatred who died?

Why are these people offered the right to law in the UK that they use to their own advantage but would never offer to their victims?

Is the law in France different, then?

:shock:

what has French law got to do with British law in either of these two cases as both have happened in the UK? and also why do you need to appear shocked that you mentioned French law rather than UK law in these two cases?

All I said was that sadly British law has made it possible for Abu Hamza to spend several years playing the UK/European system and for Ian Brady to spend nigh on 50 years tormenting his victims in denying them the knowledge of where he buried their son even past their deaths. In neither case did I offer any judgement – all I said was that it was very sad they had been able to do what they have done by using British/European law.

Sometimes human decency disappears when trying to put others down and I have felt great sympathy for the victims of others crimes

What has French law got to do with it?

I’ve highlighted the answer to your own question using your own post – please see above.

Last time I looked, France was part of the EU. No doubt, the French equivalent of Hamza and Brady would also use French / European law to play the system with much the same outcome.

I really cannot stand smug ex-pats like you criticising this country. You chose to live elsewhere so confine your criticism to the country of your choice, not to the country of your birth that you willingly left for “a better life.”

[panda12]

I see the point in keeping him alive to make him suffer, and to not grant him his wish to die but this bloke is a “bed blocker.”

I wouldn’t want any deserving person denied treatment because this piece of shyte is taking up valuable NHS resources.

[panda12]

@jen_jen wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@jen_jen wrote:

It’s a sensitive topic, poli has expressed a controversial view that several people disagree with…why is expressing that disagreement seen as poli-bashing?

Grrrrrrrrrrrr @ you Jen!

Stop talking sense, woman! :D

:oops: sorry (not)

Hehe. I can read the small print, y’know. :P

[Author]

Posts